Implant Surface Modifications: A Review
The aim of the present review was to elaborate on the surface modifications of biomaterials which are used in implant dentistry. The ongoing studies on the clinical and laboratory phases and on the biomaterial sciences have largely aimed at invoking a stronger bone response and an earlier and lo...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2012-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/1937/45-%203642.A.pdf |
| _version_ | 1828476286948868096 |
|---|---|
| author | Hemlata Garg Gaurav Bedi Arvind Garg |
| author_facet | Hemlata Garg Gaurav Bedi Arvind Garg |
| author_sort | Hemlata Garg |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of the present review was to elaborate on the surface
modifications of biomaterials which are used in implant dentistry.
The ongoing studies on the clinical and laboratory phases and on
the biomaterial sciences have largely aimed at invoking a stronger
bone response and an earlier and longer functional loading.
Surgical grafting procedures to improve the bone bed are used
to create an ideal environment for the implant functioning. The
implant selection which is based on the available bone, is also
an important determiner of the long term clinical success. The
interfacial zone between the implant and the bone is composed
of a relatively thin layer (<100um) which consists of heterogenous
metallic oxide, proteins and connective tissue. The integrity of the
implant – tissue interface is dependent on the material and on
mechanical, chemical, surface, biological and local environmental
factors, all of which change as a function of time in vivo.
Because a stable interface must be developed before the loading,
it is desirable that the tissue apposition may be accelerated
to the implant surface. The material developments that have
been implemented in the clinical practice include the use of
surface roughened implants and bioactive ceramic coatings.
Osseointegration occurs around the screw threaded implants
through the tissue ongrowth or through a direct apposition
between the tissue and the implant surface. The alternative
methods of the implant-tissue attachments, based on the tissue
ingrowth into roughened or three dimensional surface layers,
yield a higher bone metal shear strength and decreased implant
loosening. A positive effect of various surface modifications
which are illustrated in this review, has been observed and
suggested by many groups. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T06:26:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1d1a405eac1845149cd8e4eaff3298d9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2249-782X 0973-709X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T06:26:35Z |
| publishDate | 2012-04-01 |
| publisher | JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-1d1a405eac1845149cd8e4eaff3298d92022-12-22T01:17:38ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2012-04-0162319324Implant Surface Modifications: A ReviewHemlata Garg0Gaurav Bedi1Arvind Garg2Reader, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University Gr. Noida, India.Reader, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University Gr. Noida, India.Associate Professor, Krishna Dental College, Ghaziabad, India.The aim of the present review was to elaborate on the surface modifications of biomaterials which are used in implant dentistry. The ongoing studies on the clinical and laboratory phases and on the biomaterial sciences have largely aimed at invoking a stronger bone response and an earlier and longer functional loading. Surgical grafting procedures to improve the bone bed are used to create an ideal environment for the implant functioning. The implant selection which is based on the available bone, is also an important determiner of the long term clinical success. The interfacial zone between the implant and the bone is composed of a relatively thin layer (<100um) which consists of heterogenous metallic oxide, proteins and connective tissue. The integrity of the implant – tissue interface is dependent on the material and on mechanical, chemical, surface, biological and local environmental factors, all of which change as a function of time in vivo. Because a stable interface must be developed before the loading, it is desirable that the tissue apposition may be accelerated to the implant surface. The material developments that have been implemented in the clinical practice include the use of surface roughened implants and bioactive ceramic coatings. Osseointegration occurs around the screw threaded implants through the tissue ongrowth or through a direct apposition between the tissue and the implant surface. The alternative methods of the implant-tissue attachments, based on the tissue ingrowth into roughened or three dimensional surface layers, yield a higher bone metal shear strength and decreased implant loosening. A positive effect of various surface modifications which are illustrated in this review, has been observed and suggested by many groups.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/1937/45-%203642.A.pdfhydrophilic surface laser etching nanotitania osseointegration aniodized implants biotolerant |
| spellingShingle | Hemlata Garg Gaurav Bedi Arvind Garg Implant Surface Modifications: A Review Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research hydrophilic surface laser etching nanotitania osseointegration aniodized implants biotolerant |
| title | Implant Surface Modifications: A Review |
| title_full | Implant Surface Modifications: A Review |
| title_fullStr | Implant Surface Modifications: A Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implant Surface Modifications: A Review |
| title_short | Implant Surface Modifications: A Review |
| title_sort | implant surface modifications a review |
| topic | hydrophilic surface laser etching nanotitania osseointegration aniodized implants biotolerant |
| url | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/1937/45-%203642.A.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hemlatagarg implantsurfacemodificationsareview AT gauravbedi implantsurfacemodificationsareview AT arvindgarg implantsurfacemodificationsareview |