Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe—and slightly better!

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to compare early (15 min) and late (60 min) [18F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition times in the detection of recurrence/residual disease in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patients. Materials and Methods Thirty-two dual-phase [18F]FDOPA PET scans were retrospectively...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff, André H. Dias, Peter Iversen, Lars Christian Gormsen, Karin Hjorthaug
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-08-01
Series:European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00140-7
_version_ 1818082338037301248
author Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff
André H. Dias
Peter Iversen
Lars Christian Gormsen
Karin Hjorthaug
author_facet Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff
André H. Dias
Peter Iversen
Lars Christian Gormsen
Karin Hjorthaug
author_sort Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to compare early (15 min) and late (60 min) [18F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition times in the detection of recurrence/residual disease in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patients. Materials and Methods Thirty-two dual-phase [18F]FDOPA PET scans were retrospectively reviewed. Scan indications were (1) suspected recurrence of MTC, (2) treatment monitoring, or (3) restaging. In four scans, no final verification could be obtained, and one scan was excluded due to non-consistency with the acquisition protocol. Images were analyzed visually and semiquantitatively (using SUVmax). On both per-scan and per-lesion basis, early (median time 15 min) and late (median time 60 min) acquisition were compared by number and SUVmax of detected MTC lesions, and a washout rate between the two acquisitions was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity of early and late acquisition were also compared. Results Out of the 27 eligible PET scans, twenty were classified as PET positive and 7 as PET negative. By subsequent histology and/or combination of imaging and clinical data during follow-up, the MTC diagnosis was verified, showing a scan-based sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 87.5%, respectively, for the early acquisition, and for the late acquisition both were 100%. However, there were no statistically significant difference in detection rate between the two acquisitions. Lesions on the early acquisition were significantly more intense compared to lesions on the late acquisition (median washout rate of − 33% (− 57 to + 50%)). Conclusion Our study confirms that it is safe to omit the late [18F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition in the detection of recurrent/residual MTC.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T19:20:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d21400bb6f14557a2fc827540862014
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2510-3636
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T19:20:30Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
spelling doaj.art-1d21400bb6f14557a2fc8275408620142022-12-22T01:36:29ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Journal of Hybrid Imaging2510-36362022-08-016111110.1186/s41824-022-00140-7Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe—and slightly better!Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff0André H. Dias1Peter Iversen2Lars Christian Gormsen3Karin Hjorthaug4Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre, Aarhus University HospitalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre, Aarhus University HospitalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre, Aarhus University HospitalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre, Aarhus University HospitalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre, Aarhus University HospitalAbstract Purpose The aim of this study was to compare early (15 min) and late (60 min) [18F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition times in the detection of recurrence/residual disease in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patients. Materials and Methods Thirty-two dual-phase [18F]FDOPA PET scans were retrospectively reviewed. Scan indications were (1) suspected recurrence of MTC, (2) treatment monitoring, or (3) restaging. In four scans, no final verification could be obtained, and one scan was excluded due to non-consistency with the acquisition protocol. Images were analyzed visually and semiquantitatively (using SUVmax). On both per-scan and per-lesion basis, early (median time 15 min) and late (median time 60 min) acquisition were compared by number and SUVmax of detected MTC lesions, and a washout rate between the two acquisitions was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity of early and late acquisition were also compared. Results Out of the 27 eligible PET scans, twenty were classified as PET positive and 7 as PET negative. By subsequent histology and/or combination of imaging and clinical data during follow-up, the MTC diagnosis was verified, showing a scan-based sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 87.5%, respectively, for the early acquisition, and for the late acquisition both were 100%. However, there were no statistically significant difference in detection rate between the two acquisitions. Lesions on the early acquisition were significantly more intense compared to lesions on the late acquisition (median washout rate of − 33% (− 57 to + 50%)). Conclusion Our study confirms that it is safe to omit the late [18F]FDOPA PET/CT acquisition in the detection of recurrent/residual MTC.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00140-7
spellingShingle Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff
André H. Dias
Peter Iversen
Lars Christian Gormsen
Karin Hjorthaug
Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe—and slightly better!
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
title Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe—and slightly better!
title_full Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe—and slightly better!
title_fullStr Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe—and slightly better!
title_full_unstemmed Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe—and slightly better!
title_short Early acquisition of [18F]FDOPA PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe—and slightly better!
title_sort early acquisition of 18f fdopa pet ct imaging in patients with recurrent or residual medullary thyroid cancer is safe and slightly better
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00140-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mettelouisegramkjærulff earlyacquisitionof18ffdopapetctimaginginpatientswithrecurrentorresidualmedullarythyroidcancerissafeandslightlybetter
AT andrehdias earlyacquisitionof18ffdopapetctimaginginpatientswithrecurrentorresidualmedullarythyroidcancerissafeandslightlybetter
AT peteriversen earlyacquisitionof18ffdopapetctimaginginpatientswithrecurrentorresidualmedullarythyroidcancerissafeandslightlybetter
AT larschristiangormsen earlyacquisitionof18ffdopapetctimaginginpatientswithrecurrentorresidualmedullarythyroidcancerissafeandslightlybetter
AT karinhjorthaug earlyacquisitionof18ffdopapetctimaginginpatientswithrecurrentorresidualmedullarythyroidcancerissafeandslightlybetter