Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation: Why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go?

A survey of pulmonologists attending a clinical meeting of the Saudi Thoracic Society found that only 55% of responders considered that inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) had a positive effect on quality of life in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Why the divergence of opinion when all the g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faisal A AI-Kassimi, Esam H Alhamad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2013;volume=8;issue=1;spage=8;epage=13;aulast=AI-Kassimi
_version_ 1818280107264966656
author Faisal A AI-Kassimi
Esam H Alhamad
author_facet Faisal A AI-Kassimi
Esam H Alhamad
author_sort Faisal A AI-Kassimi
collection DOAJ
description A survey of pulmonologists attending a clinical meeting of the Saudi Thoracic Society found that only 55% of responders considered that inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) had a positive effect on quality of life in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Why the divergence of opinion when all the guidelines have concluded that ICS improve quality of life and produce significant bronchodilation? ICS unequivocally reduce the rate of exacerbations by a modest 20%, but this does not extend to serious exacerbations requiring hospitalization. Bronchodilatation with ICS is now documented to be restricted to some phenotypes of COPD. Withdrawal of ICS trials reported a modest decline of FEV 1 (<5%) in half the studies and no decline in the other half. In spite of the guidelines statements, there is no concurrence on whether ICS improve the quality of life and there is no conclusive evidence that the combination of long-acting ß2 agonists (LABA) with ICS is superior to LABA alone in that regard. The explanation for these inconclusive results may be related to the fact that COPD consists of three different phenotypes with divergent responses to LABA and ICS. Therapy tailored to phenotype is the future for COPD.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T23:43:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d240a9d6fe24d03ad70099427ae6bb1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1817-1737
1998-3557
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T23:43:58Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Annals of Thoracic Medicine
spelling doaj.art-1d240a9d6fe24d03ad70099427ae6bb12022-12-22T00:06:57ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Thoracic Medicine1817-17371998-35572013-01-018181310.4103/1817-1737.105711Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation: Why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go?Faisal A AI-KassimiEsam H AlhamadA survey of pulmonologists attending a clinical meeting of the Saudi Thoracic Society found that only 55% of responders considered that inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) had a positive effect on quality of life in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Why the divergence of opinion when all the guidelines have concluded that ICS improve quality of life and produce significant bronchodilation? ICS unequivocally reduce the rate of exacerbations by a modest 20%, but this does not extend to serious exacerbations requiring hospitalization. Bronchodilatation with ICS is now documented to be restricted to some phenotypes of COPD. Withdrawal of ICS trials reported a modest decline of FEV 1 (<5%) in half the studies and no decline in the other half. In spite of the guidelines statements, there is no concurrence on whether ICS improve the quality of life and there is no conclusive evidence that the combination of long-acting ß2 agonists (LABA) with ICS is superior to LABA alone in that regard. The explanation for these inconclusive results may be related to the fact that COPD consists of three different phenotypes with divergent responses to LABA and ICS. Therapy tailored to phenotype is the future for COPD.http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2013;volume=8;issue=1;spage=8;epage=13;aulast=AI-KassimiCOPDinhaled corticosteroidsphenotyping
spellingShingle Faisal A AI-Kassimi
Esam H Alhamad
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation: Why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go?
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
COPD
inhaled corticosteroids
phenotyping
title Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation: Why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go?
title_full Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation: Why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go?
title_fullStr Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation: Why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go?
title_full_unstemmed Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation: Why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go?
title_short Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation: Why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go?
title_sort chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lost in translation why are the inhaled corticosteroids skeptics refusing to go
topic COPD
inhaled corticosteroids
phenotyping
url http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2013;volume=8;issue=1;spage=8;epage=13;aulast=AI-Kassimi
work_keys_str_mv AT faisalaaikassimi chronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaselostintranslationwhyaretheinhaledcorticosteroidsskepticsrefusingtogo
AT esamhalhamad chronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaselostintranslationwhyaretheinhaledcorticosteroidsskepticsrefusingtogo