Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anne Sophie Mathiesen,1 Ingrid Egerod,2 Tonny Jensen,1 Gudrun Kaldan,3 Henning Langberg,4 Thordis Thomsen3 1Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Intensive Care Unit 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Cop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathiesen AS, Egerod I, Jensen T, Kaldan G, Langberg H, Thomsen T
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2018-12-01
Series:Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/psychosocial-interventions-for-reducing-diabetes-distress-in-vulnerabl-peer-reviewed-article-DMSO
_version_ 1797935597001637888
author Mathiesen AS
Egerod I
Jensen T
Kaldan G
Langberg H
Thomsen T
author_facet Mathiesen AS
Egerod I
Jensen T
Kaldan G
Langberg H
Thomsen T
author_sort Mathiesen AS
collection DOAJ
description Anne Sophie Mathiesen,1 Ingrid Egerod,2 Tonny Jensen,1 Gudrun Kaldan,3 Henning Langberg,4 Thordis Thomsen3 1Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Intensive Care Unit 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 4CopenRehab, Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract: Diabetes distress (DD) disproportionately affects vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and interventions targeting this population are therefore relevant. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the evidence for an effect of psychosocial interventions for reducing DD, and, secondly HbA1c, depression, and health-related quality of life in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vulnerability encompasses poor glycemic control (HbA1c >7.5%) and at least one additional risk factor for poor diabetes outcomes such as low educational level, comorbidity, and risky lifestyle behavior. The interventions should be theoretically founded and include cognition- or emotion-focused elements. We systematically searched four databases for articles published between January 1995 and March 2018. Eighteen studies testing a variety of psychosocial interventions in 4,066 patients were included. We adhered to the Cochrane methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Review Manager 5.3 was used for data extraction and risk of bias assessment, and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation for assessing the quality of the evidence. Data were pooled using the fixed or random effects method as appropriate. We investigated effects of individual vs group, intensive vs brief interventions, and interventions with and without motivational interviewing in subgroup analyses. To assess the robustness of effect estimates, sensitivity analyses excluding studies with high risk of bias and attrition >20% were conducted. We found low to moderate quality evidence for a significant small effect of psychosocial interventions on DD, and very low to moderate quality evidence for no effect on HbA1c, both outcomes assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. The effect on depression was small, while there was no effect on health-related quality of life. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that interventions using motivational interviewing and individual interventions were associated with incremental effects on DD. Likewise, intensive interventions were associated with significant reductions in both DD and HbA1c. Keywords: diabetes distress, HbA1c, meta-analysis, psychosocial interventions, type 2 diabetes, vulnerable populations
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:16:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d2e8a841c9e466b9f26766a44517db8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-7007
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T18:16:35Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
spelling doaj.art-1d2e8a841c9e466b9f26766a44517db82023-02-02T08:20:07ZengDove Medical PressDiabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity1178-70072018-12-01Volume 12193343089Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysisMathiesen ASEgerod IJensen TKaldan GLangberg HThomsen TAnne Sophie Mathiesen,1 Ingrid Egerod,2 Tonny Jensen,1 Gudrun Kaldan,3 Henning Langberg,4 Thordis Thomsen3 1Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Intensive Care Unit 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 4CopenRehab, Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract: Diabetes distress (DD) disproportionately affects vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and interventions targeting this population are therefore relevant. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the evidence for an effect of psychosocial interventions for reducing DD, and, secondly HbA1c, depression, and health-related quality of life in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vulnerability encompasses poor glycemic control (HbA1c >7.5%) and at least one additional risk factor for poor diabetes outcomes such as low educational level, comorbidity, and risky lifestyle behavior. The interventions should be theoretically founded and include cognition- or emotion-focused elements. We systematically searched four databases for articles published between January 1995 and March 2018. Eighteen studies testing a variety of psychosocial interventions in 4,066 patients were included. We adhered to the Cochrane methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Review Manager 5.3 was used for data extraction and risk of bias assessment, and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation for assessing the quality of the evidence. Data were pooled using the fixed or random effects method as appropriate. We investigated effects of individual vs group, intensive vs brief interventions, and interventions with and without motivational interviewing in subgroup analyses. To assess the robustness of effect estimates, sensitivity analyses excluding studies with high risk of bias and attrition >20% were conducted. We found low to moderate quality evidence for a significant small effect of psychosocial interventions on DD, and very low to moderate quality evidence for no effect on HbA1c, both outcomes assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. The effect on depression was small, while there was no effect on health-related quality of life. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that interventions using motivational interviewing and individual interventions were associated with incremental effects on DD. Likewise, intensive interventions were associated with significant reductions in both DD and HbA1c. Keywords: diabetes distress, HbA1c, meta-analysis, psychosocial interventions, type 2 diabetes, vulnerable populationshttps://www.dovepress.com/psychosocial-interventions-for-reducing-diabetes-distress-in-vulnerabl-peer-reviewed-article-DMSODiabetes distressHbA1cMeta-analysisPsychosocial interventionsType 2 diabetesVulnerable populations
spellingShingle Mathiesen AS
Egerod I
Jensen T
Kaldan G
Langberg H
Thomsen T
Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
Diabetes distress
HbA1c
Meta-analysis
Psychosocial interventions
Type 2 diabetes
Vulnerable populations
title Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Diabetes distress
HbA1c
Meta-analysis
Psychosocial interventions
Type 2 diabetes
Vulnerable populations
url https://www.dovepress.com/psychosocial-interventions-for-reducing-diabetes-distress-in-vulnerabl-peer-reviewed-article-DMSO
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiesenas psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT egerodi psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jensent psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kaldang psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT langbergh psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thomsent psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis