The case for an emergentist approach

<p class="Abstract">This paper sets out an argument in favour of emergentism as an alternative theoretical paradigm to nativism, arguing that it offers a coherent, evidence-based account of language structure, language acquisition, language evolution, and language change. A number of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bertus van Rooy, Haidee Kruger
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Stellenbosch University 2016-01-01
Series:Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus
Online Access:http://spilplus.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/676
_version_ 1819151197319200768
author Bertus van Rooy
Haidee Kruger
author_facet Bertus van Rooy
Haidee Kruger
author_sort Bertus van Rooy
collection DOAJ
description <p class="Abstract">This paper sets out an argument in favour of emergentism as an alternative theoretical paradigm to nativism, arguing that it offers a coherent, evidence-based account of language structure, language acquisition, language evolution, and language change. A number of key tenets of the nativist approach are summarised first, including the nature of the presumed complexity of language, the poverty of the input argument against the learnability of language, the assumption of parsimony, the view of language as innate, biological faculty, and the view of the primary function of language as cognitive representation rather than communication. This is followed by a presentation of the emergentist alternative, which is centred on the notion of the grammatical construction as central unit in the emergentist approach. The properties of constructions, and how they can come into being with recourse to only domain-general cognitive processes, are presented, before the implications of this view for language structure, language acquisition, language evolution and language change are discussed. Additional points of difference with the nativist position are highlighted, including the assumptions of non-parsimonious storage and the centrality of communicative interaction in the ontogenetic and phylogenetic development of language. Throughout the presentation, arguments are illustrated with reference to aspects of complementation in the Germanic languages. The article concludes with a detailed case study of the wh-extraction construction, drawing on an analysis of corpus data from Afrikaans, to demonstrate how the construction-based, emergentist approach leads to an insightful analysis of a well-known construction, without having to make extensive assumptions about the underlying linguistic complexity and the need for innate mechanisms to enable the acquisition of such a complex construction.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-22T14:29:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d37aadb6de84644b190011900f15eb8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-541X
2224-3380
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2024-12-22T14:29:34Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Stellenbosch University
record_format Article
series Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus
spelling doaj.art-1d37aadb6de84644b190011900f15eb82022-12-21T18:22:47ZafrStellenbosch UniversityStellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus1726-541X2224-33802016-01-01480416710.5842/48-0-676604The case for an emergentist approachBertus van Rooy0Haidee Kruger1North West UniversityMacquarie University and North-West University<p class="Abstract">This paper sets out an argument in favour of emergentism as an alternative theoretical paradigm to nativism, arguing that it offers a coherent, evidence-based account of language structure, language acquisition, language evolution, and language change. A number of key tenets of the nativist approach are summarised first, including the nature of the presumed complexity of language, the poverty of the input argument against the learnability of language, the assumption of parsimony, the view of language as innate, biological faculty, and the view of the primary function of language as cognitive representation rather than communication. This is followed by a presentation of the emergentist alternative, which is centred on the notion of the grammatical construction as central unit in the emergentist approach. The properties of constructions, and how they can come into being with recourse to only domain-general cognitive processes, are presented, before the implications of this view for language structure, language acquisition, language evolution and language change are discussed. Additional points of difference with the nativist position are highlighted, including the assumptions of non-parsimonious storage and the centrality of communicative interaction in the ontogenetic and phylogenetic development of language. Throughout the presentation, arguments are illustrated with reference to aspects of complementation in the Germanic languages. The article concludes with a detailed case study of the wh-extraction construction, drawing on an analysis of corpus data from Afrikaans, to demonstrate how the construction-based, emergentist approach leads to an insightful analysis of a well-known construction, without having to make extensive assumptions about the underlying linguistic complexity and the need for innate mechanisms to enable the acquisition of such a complex construction.</p>http://spilplus.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/676
spellingShingle Bertus van Rooy
Haidee Kruger
The case for an emergentist approach
Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus
title The case for an emergentist approach
title_full The case for an emergentist approach
title_fullStr The case for an emergentist approach
title_full_unstemmed The case for an emergentist approach
title_short The case for an emergentist approach
title_sort case for an emergentist approach
url http://spilplus.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/676
work_keys_str_mv AT bertusvanrooy thecaseforanemergentistapproach
AT haideekruger thecaseforanemergentistapproach
AT bertusvanrooy caseforanemergentistapproach
AT haideekruger caseforanemergentistapproach