Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?
It is a long known problem that the preferential publication of statistically significant results (publication bias) may lead to incorrect estimates of the true effects being investigated. Even though other research areas (e.g., medicine, biology) are aware of the problem, and have identified strong...
Main Authors: | Frank Renkewitz, Heather M. Fuchs, Susann Fiedler |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/11/m27/m27.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?
by: Frank Renkewitz, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments
by: Peter-Paul Zwetsloot, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Identification of Effectiveness Measurements and Bias Publication of Literature Results Study: A Cooperative Learning Models on Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Vocational School Students in Indonesia
by: M. Rais Ridwan, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
The narrative bias
revisited: What drives the biasing influence of narrative information on risk
perceptions?
by: Cornelia Betsch, et al.
Published: (2015-05-01) -
On making the right
choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious
thought advantage
by: Mark R. Nieuwenstein, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)