Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection.

In the pathogenesis of sepsis, activation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses are key components, but knowledge is lacking on the association between bacterial etiology and development of dysregulated responses with sustained immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Cajander, Gunlög Rasmussen, Elisabet Tina, Anders Magnuson, Bo Söderquist, Jan Källman, Kristoffer Strålin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5821339?pdf=render
_version_ 1818511220674658304
author Sara Cajander
Gunlög Rasmussen
Elisabet Tina
Anders Magnuson
Bo Söderquist
Jan Källman
Kristoffer Strålin
author_facet Sara Cajander
Gunlög Rasmussen
Elisabet Tina
Anders Magnuson
Bo Söderquist
Jan Källman
Kristoffer Strålin
author_sort Sara Cajander
collection DOAJ
description In the pathogenesis of sepsis, activation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses are key components, but knowledge is lacking on the association between bacterial etiology and development of dysregulated responses with sustained immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the immunosupression marker HLA-DR on monocytes (mHLA-DR) is associated with bacterial etiology and markers of inflammation during the clinical trajectory of bloodstream infection (BSI).Ninety-one adults, predominantly non-ICU patients, with BSI caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 27), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 22), Escherichia coli/Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 23), and other species (n = 19) were prospectively included, and sampled on admission (day 0) and on days 1-2, 3, 7±1, 14±2, and 28±4.The dynamics of mHLA-DR, measured by flow cytometry, differed significantly between etiology groups (p<0.001). Patients with S. pneumoniae and S. aureus BSI demonstrated low initial mHLA-DR, with the S. aureus group showing delayed recovery over time. Eleven patients (55% S. aureus) had negative outcome (secondary bacteremia or death) and they demonstrated sustained C-reactive protein elevation, neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and loss of mHLA-DR.Dynamics of mHLA-DR varied according to the bacterial etiology of infection, with delayed recovery in patients with S. aureus BSI. Patients with negative outcome showed sustained CRP elevation, neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and low levels of mHLA-DR, supporting the theory of a dysregulated host response with persistent inflammation and immunosuppression in late stages of deleterious sepsis.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T23:30:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d539a6020b341b4a43084a98d6bb951
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T23:30:26Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-1d539a6020b341b4a43084a98d6bb9512022-12-22T01:29:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019288310.1371/journal.pone.0192883Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection.Sara CajanderGunlög RasmussenElisabet TinaAnders MagnusonBo SöderquistJan KällmanKristoffer StrålinIn the pathogenesis of sepsis, activation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses are key components, but knowledge is lacking on the association between bacterial etiology and development of dysregulated responses with sustained immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the immunosupression marker HLA-DR on monocytes (mHLA-DR) is associated with bacterial etiology and markers of inflammation during the clinical trajectory of bloodstream infection (BSI).Ninety-one adults, predominantly non-ICU patients, with BSI caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 27), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 22), Escherichia coli/Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 23), and other species (n = 19) were prospectively included, and sampled on admission (day 0) and on days 1-2, 3, 7±1, 14±2, and 28±4.The dynamics of mHLA-DR, measured by flow cytometry, differed significantly between etiology groups (p<0.001). Patients with S. pneumoniae and S. aureus BSI demonstrated low initial mHLA-DR, with the S. aureus group showing delayed recovery over time. Eleven patients (55% S. aureus) had negative outcome (secondary bacteremia or death) and they demonstrated sustained C-reactive protein elevation, neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and loss of mHLA-DR.Dynamics of mHLA-DR varied according to the bacterial etiology of infection, with delayed recovery in patients with S. aureus BSI. Patients with negative outcome showed sustained CRP elevation, neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and low levels of mHLA-DR, supporting the theory of a dysregulated host response with persistent inflammation and immunosuppression in late stages of deleterious sepsis.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5821339?pdf=render
spellingShingle Sara Cajander
Gunlög Rasmussen
Elisabet Tina
Anders Magnuson
Bo Söderquist
Jan Källman
Kristoffer Strålin
Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection.
PLoS ONE
title Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection.
title_full Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection.
title_fullStr Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection.
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection.
title_short Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection.
title_sort dynamics of monocytic hla dr expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5821339?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT saracajander dynamicsofmonocytichladrexpressiondiffersbetweenbacterialetiologiesduringthecourseofbloodstreaminfection
AT gunlograsmussen dynamicsofmonocytichladrexpressiondiffersbetweenbacterialetiologiesduringthecourseofbloodstreaminfection
AT elisabettina dynamicsofmonocytichladrexpressiondiffersbetweenbacterialetiologiesduringthecourseofbloodstreaminfection
AT andersmagnuson dynamicsofmonocytichladrexpressiondiffersbetweenbacterialetiologiesduringthecourseofbloodstreaminfection
AT bosoderquist dynamicsofmonocytichladrexpressiondiffersbetweenbacterialetiologiesduringthecourseofbloodstreaminfection
AT jankallman dynamicsofmonocytichladrexpressiondiffersbetweenbacterialetiologiesduringthecourseofbloodstreaminfection
AT kristofferstralin dynamicsofmonocytichladrexpressiondiffersbetweenbacterialetiologiesduringthecourseofbloodstreaminfection