Quantitative Effect of Metal Artefact Reduction on CT-based attenuation correction in FDG PET/CT in patients with hip prosthesis

Abstract Background Metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques still are in limited use in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). This study aimed to investigate the effect of Smart MAR on quantitative PET analysis in the vicinity of hip prostheses. Materials and methods Activitie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maarten Haemels, Delphine Vandendriessche, Jeroen De Geeter, James Velghe, Maxence Vandekerckhove, Frank De Geeter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-10-01
Series:EJNMMI Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00414-2
_version_ 1818987226759954432
author Maarten Haemels
Delphine Vandendriessche
Jeroen De Geeter
James Velghe
Maxence Vandekerckhove
Frank De Geeter
author_facet Maarten Haemels
Delphine Vandendriessche
Jeroen De Geeter
James Velghe
Maxence Vandekerckhove
Frank De Geeter
author_sort Maarten Haemels
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques still are in limited use in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). This study aimed to investigate the effect of Smart MAR on quantitative PET analysis in the vicinity of hip prostheses. Materials and methods Activities were measured on PET/CT images in 6 sources with tenfold activity concentration contrast to background, attached to the head, neck and the major trochanter of a human cadaveric femur, and in the same sources in similar locations after a hip prosthesis (titanium cup, ceramic head, chrome-cobalt stem) had been inserted into the femur. Measurements were compared between PET attenuation corrected using either conventional or MAR CT. In 38 patients harbouring 49 hip prostheses, standardized uptake values (SUV) in 6 periprosthetic regions and the bladder were compared between PET attenuation corrected with either conventional or MAR CT. Results Using conventional CT, measured activity decreased with 2 to 13% when the prosthesis was inserted. Use of MAR CT increased measured activity by up to 11% compared with conventional CT and reduced the relative difference with the reference values to under 5% in all sources. In all regions, to the exception of the prosthesis shaft, SUVmean increased significantly (p < 0.001) by use of MAR CT. Median (interquartile range) percentual increases of SUVmean were 1.4 (0.0–4.2), 4.0 (1.8–7.8), 7.8 (4.1–12.4), 1.5 (0.0–3.2), 1.4 (0.8–2.8) in acetabulum, lateral neck, medial neck, lateral diaphysis and medial diaphysis, respectively. Except for the shaft, the coefficient of variation did not increase significantly. Except for the erratic changes in the prosthesis shaft, decreases in SUVmean were rare and small. Bladder SUVmean increased by 0.9% in patients with unilateral prosthesis and by 4.1% in patients with bilateral prosthesis. Conclusions In a realistic hip prosthesis phantom, Smart MAR restores quantitative accuracy by recovering counts in underestimated sources. In patient studies, Smart MAR increases SUV in all areas surrounding the prosthesis, most markedly in the femoral neck region. This proves that underestimation of activity in the PET image is the most prevalent effect due to metal artefacts in the CT image in patients with hip prostheses. Smart MAR increases SUV in the urinary bladder, indicating effects at a distance from the prosthesis.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T19:03:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d57c3799b6f4e0c9c6926b8f98d6974
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-7364
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T19:03:20Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series EJNMMI Physics
spelling doaj.art-1d57c3799b6f4e0c9c6926b8f98d69742022-12-21T19:29:20ZengSpringerOpenEJNMMI Physics2197-73642021-10-018112010.1186/s40658-021-00414-2Quantitative Effect of Metal Artefact Reduction on CT-based attenuation correction in FDG PET/CT in patients with hip prosthesisMaarten Haemels0Delphine Vandendriessche1Jeroen De Geeter2James Velghe3Maxence Vandekerckhove4Frank De Geeter5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-OostendeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-OostendeELEC Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Vrije Universiteit BrusselNuclear Technology Center, UHasselt, Campus DiepenbeekDepartment of Orthopedics, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-OostendeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-OostendeAbstract Background Metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques still are in limited use in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). This study aimed to investigate the effect of Smart MAR on quantitative PET analysis in the vicinity of hip prostheses. Materials and methods Activities were measured on PET/CT images in 6 sources with tenfold activity concentration contrast to background, attached to the head, neck and the major trochanter of a human cadaveric femur, and in the same sources in similar locations after a hip prosthesis (titanium cup, ceramic head, chrome-cobalt stem) had been inserted into the femur. Measurements were compared between PET attenuation corrected using either conventional or MAR CT. In 38 patients harbouring 49 hip prostheses, standardized uptake values (SUV) in 6 periprosthetic regions and the bladder were compared between PET attenuation corrected with either conventional or MAR CT. Results Using conventional CT, measured activity decreased with 2 to 13% when the prosthesis was inserted. Use of MAR CT increased measured activity by up to 11% compared with conventional CT and reduced the relative difference with the reference values to under 5% in all sources. In all regions, to the exception of the prosthesis shaft, SUVmean increased significantly (p < 0.001) by use of MAR CT. Median (interquartile range) percentual increases of SUVmean were 1.4 (0.0–4.2), 4.0 (1.8–7.8), 7.8 (4.1–12.4), 1.5 (0.0–3.2), 1.4 (0.8–2.8) in acetabulum, lateral neck, medial neck, lateral diaphysis and medial diaphysis, respectively. Except for the shaft, the coefficient of variation did not increase significantly. Except for the erratic changes in the prosthesis shaft, decreases in SUVmean were rare and small. Bladder SUVmean increased by 0.9% in patients with unilateral prosthesis and by 4.1% in patients with bilateral prosthesis. Conclusions In a realistic hip prosthesis phantom, Smart MAR restores quantitative accuracy by recovering counts in underestimated sources. In patient studies, Smart MAR increases SUV in all areas surrounding the prosthesis, most markedly in the femoral neck region. This proves that underestimation of activity in the PET image is the most prevalent effect due to metal artefacts in the CT image in patients with hip prostheses. Smart MAR increases SUV in the urinary bladder, indicating effects at a distance from the prosthesis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00414-2Metal artefact reductionHip prosthesisQuantitative accuracy
spellingShingle Maarten Haemels
Delphine Vandendriessche
Jeroen De Geeter
James Velghe
Maxence Vandekerckhove
Frank De Geeter
Quantitative Effect of Metal Artefact Reduction on CT-based attenuation correction in FDG PET/CT in patients with hip prosthesis
EJNMMI Physics
Metal artefact reduction
Hip prosthesis
Quantitative accuracy
title Quantitative Effect of Metal Artefact Reduction on CT-based attenuation correction in FDG PET/CT in patients with hip prosthesis
title_full Quantitative Effect of Metal Artefact Reduction on CT-based attenuation correction in FDG PET/CT in patients with hip prosthesis
title_fullStr Quantitative Effect of Metal Artefact Reduction on CT-based attenuation correction in FDG PET/CT in patients with hip prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Effect of Metal Artefact Reduction on CT-based attenuation correction in FDG PET/CT in patients with hip prosthesis
title_short Quantitative Effect of Metal Artefact Reduction on CT-based attenuation correction in FDG PET/CT in patients with hip prosthesis
title_sort quantitative effect of metal artefact reduction on ct based attenuation correction in fdg pet ct in patients with hip prosthesis
topic Metal artefact reduction
Hip prosthesis
Quantitative accuracy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00414-2
work_keys_str_mv AT maartenhaemels quantitativeeffectofmetalartefactreductiononctbasedattenuationcorrectioninfdgpetctinpatientswithhipprosthesis
AT delphinevandendriessche quantitativeeffectofmetalartefactreductiononctbasedattenuationcorrectioninfdgpetctinpatientswithhipprosthesis
AT jeroendegeeter quantitativeeffectofmetalartefactreductiononctbasedattenuationcorrectioninfdgpetctinpatientswithhipprosthesis
AT jamesvelghe quantitativeeffectofmetalartefactreductiononctbasedattenuationcorrectioninfdgpetctinpatientswithhipprosthesis
AT maxencevandekerckhove quantitativeeffectofmetalartefactreductiononctbasedattenuationcorrectioninfdgpetctinpatientswithhipprosthesis
AT frankdegeeter quantitativeeffectofmetalartefactreductiononctbasedattenuationcorrectioninfdgpetctinpatientswithhipprosthesis