Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort study

Abstract Background To examine the impact of occiput posterior position, compared to occiput anterior position, on neonatal outcomes in a setting where delayed pushing is practiced. The specific aim was to estimate the risk of acidaemia. Methods Cohort study from a university hospital in Sweden betw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristina Dahlqvist, Maria Jonsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1556-5
_version_ 1818506387108397056
author Kristina Dahlqvist
Maria Jonsson
author_facet Kristina Dahlqvist
Maria Jonsson
author_sort Kristina Dahlqvist
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To examine the impact of occiput posterior position, compared to occiput anterior position, on neonatal outcomes in a setting where delayed pushing is practiced. The specific aim was to estimate the risk of acidaemia. Methods Cohort study from a university hospital in Sweden between 2004 and 2012. Information was collected from a local database of 35,546 births. Umbilical artery sampling was routine. Outcomes were: umbilical artery pH < 7.00 and <7.10 and short-term neonatal morbidity. The association between occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes was examined using logistic regression analysis, presented as adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Of 27,648 attempted vaginal births, 1292 (4.7%) had occiput posterior position. Compared with occiput anterior, there was no difference in pH < 7.00 (0.4% vs. 0.5%) but a higher rate of pH < 7.10 in occiput posterior births (3.8 vs. 5.5%). Logistic regression analysis showed no increased risk of pH < 7.10 (AOR 1.28 95% CI 0.93–1.74) when occiput posterior was compared with occiput anterior births but, an increased risk of Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (AOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.11–3.05); neonatal care admission (AOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.17–2.42) and composite morbidity (AOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.19–2.31). Conclusions With delayed pushing, birth in occiput posterior compared with anterior position is not associated with acidaemia. The higher risk of neonatal morbidity is of concern and any long-term consequences need to be investigated in future studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T22:03:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d631d6d2ff745fe8f79ff0352b08dff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T22:03:52Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-1d631d6d2ff745fe8f79ff0352b08dff2022-12-22T01:31:49ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932017-11-011711710.1186/s12884-017-1556-5Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort studyKristina Dahlqvist0Maria Jonsson1Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala UniversityAbstract Background To examine the impact of occiput posterior position, compared to occiput anterior position, on neonatal outcomes in a setting where delayed pushing is practiced. The specific aim was to estimate the risk of acidaemia. Methods Cohort study from a university hospital in Sweden between 2004 and 2012. Information was collected from a local database of 35,546 births. Umbilical artery sampling was routine. Outcomes were: umbilical artery pH < 7.00 and <7.10 and short-term neonatal morbidity. The association between occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes was examined using logistic regression analysis, presented as adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Of 27,648 attempted vaginal births, 1292 (4.7%) had occiput posterior position. Compared with occiput anterior, there was no difference in pH < 7.00 (0.4% vs. 0.5%) but a higher rate of pH < 7.10 in occiput posterior births (3.8 vs. 5.5%). Logistic regression analysis showed no increased risk of pH < 7.10 (AOR 1.28 95% CI 0.93–1.74) when occiput posterior was compared with occiput anterior births but, an increased risk of Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (AOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.11–3.05); neonatal care admission (AOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.17–2.42) and composite morbidity (AOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.19–2.31). Conclusions With delayed pushing, birth in occiput posterior compared with anterior position is not associated with acidaemia. The higher risk of neonatal morbidity is of concern and any long-term consequences need to be investigated in future studies.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1556-5AcidaemiaApgar scoreCaesarean deliveryDelayed pushingMetabolic acidaemiaLabour
spellingShingle Kristina Dahlqvist
Maria Jonsson
Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Acidaemia
Apgar score
Caesarean delivery
Delayed pushing
Metabolic acidaemia
Labour
title Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort study
title_full Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort study
title_fullStr Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort study
title_short Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: a cohort study
title_sort neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced a cohort study
topic Acidaemia
Apgar score
Caesarean delivery
Delayed pushing
Metabolic acidaemia
Labour
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1556-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinadahlqvist neonataloutcomesofdeliveriesinocciputposteriorpositionwhendelayedpushingispracticedacohortstudy
AT mariajonsson neonataloutcomesofdeliveriesinocciputposteriorpositionwhendelayedpushingispracticedacohortstudy