SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication Ranking

Scientific papers published in journals or conferences, also considered academic publications, are the manifestation of scientific research achievements. Lots of scientific papers published in digital form bring new challenges for academic evaluation and information retrieval. Therefore, research on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinsong Zhang, Bao Jin, Junyi Sha, Yan Chen, Yijin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Algorithms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/15/5/159
_version_ 1797502162927878144
author Jinsong Zhang
Bao Jin
Junyi Sha
Yan Chen
Yijin Zhang
author_facet Jinsong Zhang
Bao Jin
Junyi Sha
Yan Chen
Yijin Zhang
author_sort Jinsong Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Scientific papers published in journals or conferences, also considered academic publications, are the manifestation of scientific research achievements. Lots of scientific papers published in digital form bring new challenges for academic evaluation and information retrieval. Therefore, research on the ranking method of scientific papers is significant for the management and evaluation of academic resources. In this paper, we first identify internal and external factors for evaluating scientific papers and propose a publication ranking method based on an analysis of a heterogeneous academic network. We use four types of metadata (i.e., author, venue (journal or conference), topic, and title) as vertexes for creating the network; in there, the topics are trained by the SentenceLDA algorithm with the metadata of the abstract. We then use the Gibbs sampling method to create a heterogeneous academic network and apply the ConNetClus algorithm to calculate the probability value of publication ranking. To evaluate the significance of the method proposed in this paper, we compare the ranking results with BM25, PageRank, etc., and homogeneous networks in MAP and NDCG. As shown in our evaluation results, the performance of the method we propose in this paper is better than other baselines for ranking publications.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:29:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d64d6f02e354e0f98dc48b05dd129ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4893
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:29:00Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Algorithms
spelling doaj.art-1d64d6f02e354e0f98dc48b05dd129ed2023-11-23T09:45:29ZengMDPI AGAlgorithms1999-48932022-05-0115515910.3390/a15050159SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication RankingJinsong Zhang0Bao Jin1Junyi Sha2Yan Chen3Yijin Zhang4School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, ChinaSchool of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, ChinaSchool of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, ChinaSchool of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116650, ChinaScientific papers published in journals or conferences, also considered academic publications, are the manifestation of scientific research achievements. Lots of scientific papers published in digital form bring new challenges for academic evaluation and information retrieval. Therefore, research on the ranking method of scientific papers is significant for the management and evaluation of academic resources. In this paper, we first identify internal and external factors for evaluating scientific papers and propose a publication ranking method based on an analysis of a heterogeneous academic network. We use four types of metadata (i.e., author, venue (journal or conference), topic, and title) as vertexes for creating the network; in there, the topics are trained by the SentenceLDA algorithm with the metadata of the abstract. We then use the Gibbs sampling method to create a heterogeneous academic network and apply the ConNetClus algorithm to calculate the probability value of publication ranking. To evaluate the significance of the method proposed in this paper, we compare the ranking results with BM25, PageRank, etc., and homogeneous networks in MAP and NDCG. As shown in our evaluation results, the performance of the method we propose in this paper is better than other baselines for ranking publications.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/15/5/159heterogeneous academic networkpublication rankingSentenceLDAConNetClus
spellingShingle Jinsong Zhang
Bao Jin
Junyi Sha
Yan Chen
Yijin Zhang
SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication Ranking
Algorithms
heterogeneous academic network
publication ranking
SentenceLDA
ConNetClus
title SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication Ranking
title_full SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication Ranking
title_fullStr SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication Ranking
title_full_unstemmed SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication Ranking
title_short SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication Ranking
title_sort sentencelda and connetclus based heterogeneous academic network analysis for publication ranking
topic heterogeneous academic network
publication ranking
SentenceLDA
ConNetClus
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/15/5/159
work_keys_str_mv AT jinsongzhang sentenceldaandconnetclusbasedheterogeneousacademicnetworkanalysisforpublicationranking
AT baojin sentenceldaandconnetclusbasedheterogeneousacademicnetworkanalysisforpublicationranking
AT junyisha sentenceldaandconnetclusbasedheterogeneousacademicnetworkanalysisforpublicationranking
AT yanchen sentenceldaandconnetclusbasedheterogeneousacademicnetworkanalysisforpublicationranking
AT yijinzhang sentenceldaandconnetclusbasedheterogeneousacademicnetworkanalysisforpublicationranking