Defining covert recording: A qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consent

Background Patients use their smartphones to covertly record their clinical encounters in hospital. However, this issue is poorly understood. Insight into the clinician perspective will help inform policies and practices that deliver safe environments for patients and clinicians. Objective This stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Ryan, Kelly A Weir, Jessica Maskell, Lily Bevan, Robyne Le Brocque
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-11-01
Series:Digital Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221134388
_version_ 1798018510757036032
author Laura Ryan
Kelly A Weir
Jessica Maskell
Lily Bevan
Robyne Le Brocque
author_facet Laura Ryan
Kelly A Weir
Jessica Maskell
Lily Bevan
Robyne Le Brocque
author_sort Laura Ryan
collection DOAJ
description Background Patients use their smartphones to covertly record their clinical encounters in hospital. However, this issue is poorly understood. Insight into the clinician perspective will help inform policies and practices that deliver safe environments for patients and clinicians. Objective This study aimed to gain a deep understanding of clinician attitudes and behaviours when a patient covertly records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone. Methods Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 20 hospital clinicians. Participants were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted in person or via Microsoft Teams. Interviews were digitally audio recorded and transcribed. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results Most of the 20 participants reported they had either suspected or experienced a patient covertly recording a clinical encounter. Covert recordings occurred across a broad range of clinical disciplines and contexts. Themes were identified from participant perspectives, including discernment of patient intention, likeliness to consent to the recording if asked, anticipated risks and potential benefits associated with the covert recording. These themes have led to the categorisation of three forms of covert recording: (1) Intentional Covert Recording (2) Inadvertently – Covert Recording, and (3) Beneficial Covert Recording. Conclusion Clinicians have varied experiences and responses when a patient covertly records a clinical encounter. Findings indicate that nuanced strategies may be required to support clinicians to manage covert recording, whilst balancing the needs of patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T16:25:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d6901f498304d6c9645f4f37600f96b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-2076
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T16:25:16Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Digital Health
spelling doaj.art-1d6901f498304d6c9645f4f37600f96b2022-12-22T04:14:12ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762022-11-01810.1177/20552076221134388Defining covert recording: A qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consentLaura Ryan0Kelly A Weir1Jessica Maskell2Lily Bevan3Robyne Le Brocque4 Allied Health Research, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Australia Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia Social Work Services, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Australia Gold Coast Health Consumer Advisory Group, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Australia School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Social Work, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, AustraliaBackground Patients use their smartphones to covertly record their clinical encounters in hospital. However, this issue is poorly understood. Insight into the clinician perspective will help inform policies and practices that deliver safe environments for patients and clinicians. Objective This study aimed to gain a deep understanding of clinician attitudes and behaviours when a patient covertly records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone. Methods Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 20 hospital clinicians. Participants were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted in person or via Microsoft Teams. Interviews were digitally audio recorded and transcribed. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results Most of the 20 participants reported they had either suspected or experienced a patient covertly recording a clinical encounter. Covert recordings occurred across a broad range of clinical disciplines and contexts. Themes were identified from participant perspectives, including discernment of patient intention, likeliness to consent to the recording if asked, anticipated risks and potential benefits associated with the covert recording. These themes have led to the categorisation of three forms of covert recording: (1) Intentional Covert Recording (2) Inadvertently – Covert Recording, and (3) Beneficial Covert Recording. Conclusion Clinicians have varied experiences and responses when a patient covertly records a clinical encounter. Findings indicate that nuanced strategies may be required to support clinicians to manage covert recording, whilst balancing the needs of patients.https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221134388
spellingShingle Laura Ryan
Kelly A Weir
Jessica Maskell
Lily Bevan
Robyne Le Brocque
Defining covert recording: A qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consent
Digital Health
title Defining covert recording: A qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consent
title_full Defining covert recording: A qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consent
title_fullStr Defining covert recording: A qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consent
title_full_unstemmed Defining covert recording: A qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consent
title_short Defining covert recording: A qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consent
title_sort defining covert recording a qualitative study exploring the experiences of clinicians when a patient records a hospital clinical encounter using a smartphone without consent
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221134388
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraryan definingcovertrecordingaqualitativestudyexploringtheexperiencesofclinicianswhenapatientrecordsahospitalclinicalencounterusingasmartphonewithoutconsent
AT kellyaweir definingcovertrecordingaqualitativestudyexploringtheexperiencesofclinicianswhenapatientrecordsahospitalclinicalencounterusingasmartphonewithoutconsent
AT jessicamaskell definingcovertrecordingaqualitativestudyexploringtheexperiencesofclinicianswhenapatientrecordsahospitalclinicalencounterusingasmartphonewithoutconsent
AT lilybevan definingcovertrecordingaqualitativestudyexploringtheexperiencesofclinicianswhenapatientrecordsahospitalclinicalencounterusingasmartphonewithoutconsent
AT robynelebrocque definingcovertrecordingaqualitativestudyexploringtheexperiencesofclinicianswhenapatientrecordsahospitalclinicalencounterusingasmartphonewithoutconsent