A retrospective comparison of two-, three-, and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies
Purpose: A total of 1276 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) using two-, three-, and four-port methods were analyzed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of two and three-port LCs in management for acute or elective gallstone disease when compared with four-port LC. Materials and Methods:...
Main Authors: | Heng Hui Lien, Chi Cheng Huang, Ching Shui Huang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Health/LWW
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Formosan Journal of Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.e-fjs.org/article.asp?issn=1682-606X;year=2017;volume=50;issue=5;spage=169;epage=174;aulast=Lien |
Similar Items
-
THREE-PORT VERSUS FOUR - PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY A TWO YEARS EXPERIENCE AT TWO ARMED FORCES TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS
by: Muhammad Tariq, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
A comparative study of two-port versus three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
by: Ranendra Hajong, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Mini-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative study
by: Sardar Hassan Arif
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Mini-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative study
by: Sardar Hassan Arif
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy versus laparoscopic (single-port and four-port) cholecystectomy
by: V. M. Klimenko, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)