Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and Texture

We examined three hypotheses in a nutrient dose and application frequency study installed in juvenile (aged 2–6 years old) Pinus stands at 22 sites in the southeastern United States. At each site, eight or nine treatments were installed where nitrogen was applied at different rates (0, 67, 134, 268...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy J. Albaugh, Thomas R. Fox, H. Lee Allen, Rafael A. Rubilar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-08-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/8/2799
_version_ 1811242484452294656
author Timothy J. Albaugh
Thomas R. Fox
H. Lee Allen
Rafael A. Rubilar
author_facet Timothy J. Albaugh
Thomas R. Fox
H. Lee Allen
Rafael A. Rubilar
author_sort Timothy J. Albaugh
collection DOAJ
description We examined three hypotheses in a nutrient dose and application frequency study installed in juvenile (aged 2–6 years old) Pinus stands at 22 sites in the southeastern United States. At each site, eight or nine treatments were installed where nitrogen was applied at different rates (0, 67, 134, 268 kg ha−1) and frequencies (0, 1, 2, 4 and 6 years) in two or four replications. Phosphorus was applied at 0.1 times the nitrogen rate and other elements were added as needed based on foliar nutrient analysis to insure that nutrient imbalances were not induced with treatment. Eight years after treatment initiation, the site responses were grouped based on texture and drainage characteristics: soil group 1 consisted of poorly drained soils with a clayey subsoil, group 2 consisted of poorly to excessively drained spodic soils or soils without a clay subsoil, and group 3 consisted of well-drained soils with a clayey subsoil. We accepted the first hypothesis that site would be a significant factor explaining growth responses. Soil group was also a significant factor explaining growth response. We accepted our second hypothesis that the volume growth-cumulative dose response function was not linear. Volume growth reached an asymptote in soil groups 1 and 3 between cumulative nitrogen doses of 300–400 kg ha−1. Volume growth responses continued to increase up to 800 kg ha−1 of cumulatively applied nitrogen for soil group 2. We accepted our third hypothesis that application rate and frequency did not influence the growth response when the cumulative nitrogen dose was equivalent. There was no difference in the growth response for comparisons where a cumulative nitrogen dose of 568 kg ha−1 was applied as 134 kg ha−1 every two years or as 269 kg ha−1 every four years, or where 269 kg ha−1 of nitrogen was applied as four applications of 67 kg ha−1 every two years or as two applications of 134 kg ha−1 every four years. Clearly, the sites examined here were limited by nitrogen and phosphorus, and applications of these elements to young stands effectively ameliorated these limitations. However, there were differences in the response magnitude that were related to soil texture and drainage. Juvenile fertilizer applications resulted in high stocking levels early in the rotation; this condition should be considered when undertaking juvenile fertilization programs.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:52:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d71f25e2ff04dffa618ae565744c809
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:52:55Z
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-1d71f25e2ff04dffa618ae565744c8092022-12-22T03:30:28ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072015-08-01682799281910.3390/f6082799f6082799Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and TextureTimothy J. Albaugh0Thomas R. Fox1H. Lee Allen2Rafael A. Rubilar3Virginia Tech Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, 228 Cheatham Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USAVirginia Tech Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, 228 Cheatham Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USAProFor Consulting, Cary, NC 27511, USACooperativa de Productividad Forestal. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción. Victoria 631, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, ChileWe examined three hypotheses in a nutrient dose and application frequency study installed in juvenile (aged 2–6 years old) Pinus stands at 22 sites in the southeastern United States. At each site, eight or nine treatments were installed where nitrogen was applied at different rates (0, 67, 134, 268 kg ha−1) and frequencies (0, 1, 2, 4 and 6 years) in two or four replications. Phosphorus was applied at 0.1 times the nitrogen rate and other elements were added as needed based on foliar nutrient analysis to insure that nutrient imbalances were not induced with treatment. Eight years after treatment initiation, the site responses were grouped based on texture and drainage characteristics: soil group 1 consisted of poorly drained soils with a clayey subsoil, group 2 consisted of poorly to excessively drained spodic soils or soils without a clay subsoil, and group 3 consisted of well-drained soils with a clayey subsoil. We accepted the first hypothesis that site would be a significant factor explaining growth responses. Soil group was also a significant factor explaining growth response. We accepted our second hypothesis that the volume growth-cumulative dose response function was not linear. Volume growth reached an asymptote in soil groups 1 and 3 between cumulative nitrogen doses of 300–400 kg ha−1. Volume growth responses continued to increase up to 800 kg ha−1 of cumulatively applied nitrogen for soil group 2. We accepted our third hypothesis that application rate and frequency did not influence the growth response when the cumulative nitrogen dose was equivalent. There was no difference in the growth response for comparisons where a cumulative nitrogen dose of 568 kg ha−1 was applied as 134 kg ha−1 every two years or as 269 kg ha−1 every four years, or where 269 kg ha−1 of nitrogen was applied as four applications of 67 kg ha−1 every two years or as two applications of 134 kg ha−1 every four years. Clearly, the sites examined here were limited by nitrogen and phosphorus, and applications of these elements to young stands effectively ameliorated these limitations. However, there were differences in the response magnitude that were related to soil texture and drainage. Juvenile fertilizer applications resulted in high stocking levels early in the rotation; this condition should be considered when undertaking juvenile fertilization programs.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/8/2799rate responsesoil texturesoil drainage
spellingShingle Timothy J. Albaugh
Thomas R. Fox
H. Lee Allen
Rafael A. Rubilar
Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and Texture
Forests
rate response
soil texture
soil drainage
title Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and Texture
title_full Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and Texture
title_fullStr Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and Texture
title_full_unstemmed Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and Texture
title_short Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and Texture
title_sort juvenile southern pine response to fertilization is influenced by soil drainage and texture
topic rate response
soil texture
soil drainage
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/8/2799
work_keys_str_mv AT timothyjalbaugh juvenilesouthernpineresponsetofertilizationisinfluencedbysoildrainageandtexture
AT thomasrfox juvenilesouthernpineresponsetofertilizationisinfluencedbysoildrainageandtexture
AT hleeallen juvenilesouthernpineresponsetofertilizationisinfluencedbysoildrainageandtexture
AT rafaelarubilar juvenilesouthernpineresponsetofertilizationisinfluencedbysoildrainageandtexture