Performance, Energy and Cost of Produced Water Treatment by Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation

The separation performance, energy demand, and operating costs of electro-coagulation (EC) are compared to conventional chemical coagulation for oil–water separation using a simulated oil- and gas-produced water matrix. An iron-based chemical coagulant and sacrificial iron electrodes are evaluated....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia Miang Khor, Jinwen Wang, Minghua Li, Bruce A. Oettel, Richard B. Kaner, David Jassby, Eric M. V. Hoek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/12/3426
_version_ 1797416192895352832
author Chia Miang Khor
Jinwen Wang
Minghua Li
Bruce A. Oettel
Richard B. Kaner
David Jassby
Eric M. V. Hoek
author_facet Chia Miang Khor
Jinwen Wang
Minghua Li
Bruce A. Oettel
Richard B. Kaner
David Jassby
Eric M. V. Hoek
author_sort Chia Miang Khor
collection DOAJ
description The separation performance, energy demand, and operating costs of electro-coagulation (EC) are compared to conventional chemical coagulation for oil–water separation using a simulated oil- and gas-produced water matrix. An iron-based chemical coagulant and sacrificial iron electrodes are evaluated. Effluent turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total organic carbon (TOC), and oil and grease (O&G) removal were determined for various coagulant concentrations and reaction times and current densities. Chemical coagulation produced superior turbidity removal when scaled by the total iron dose. At lower iron doses (<500 mg/L), chemical coagulation yielded better COD, turbidity, and O&G removal. However, chemical coagulation was unable to effectively remove contaminants to meet the offshore discharge limit of 29 ppm O&G. At higher iron doses, EC was more effective at removing COD and O&G. The energy consumption of EC was found to be much higher even when factoring in the energy of production, transporting, and mixing of chemical coagulants, but the overall cost of EC was approximately half the cost of chemical coagulation, and more effective at O&G removal.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:59:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d7581e38f924c548f1b53a4fd06e703
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:59:56Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-1d7581e38f924c548f1b53a4fd06e7032023-12-03T12:09:20ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-12-011212342610.3390/w12123426Performance, Energy and Cost of Produced Water Treatment by Chemical and Electrochemical CoagulationChia Miang Khor0Jinwen Wang1Minghua Li2Bruce A. Oettel3Richard B. Kaner4David Jassby5Eric M. V. Hoek6Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAUCLA Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAUCLA California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAThe separation performance, energy demand, and operating costs of electro-coagulation (EC) are compared to conventional chemical coagulation for oil–water separation using a simulated oil- and gas-produced water matrix. An iron-based chemical coagulant and sacrificial iron electrodes are evaluated. Effluent turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total organic carbon (TOC), and oil and grease (O&G) removal were determined for various coagulant concentrations and reaction times and current densities. Chemical coagulation produced superior turbidity removal when scaled by the total iron dose. At lower iron doses (<500 mg/L), chemical coagulation yielded better COD, turbidity, and O&G removal. However, chemical coagulation was unable to effectively remove contaminants to meet the offshore discharge limit of 29 ppm O&G. At higher iron doses, EC was more effective at removing COD and O&G. The energy consumption of EC was found to be much higher even when factoring in the energy of production, transporting, and mixing of chemical coagulants, but the overall cost of EC was approximately half the cost of chemical coagulation, and more effective at O&G removal.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/12/3426produced watercoagulationelectro-coagulationenergy consumptionoperating cost
spellingShingle Chia Miang Khor
Jinwen Wang
Minghua Li
Bruce A. Oettel
Richard B. Kaner
David Jassby
Eric M. V. Hoek
Performance, Energy and Cost of Produced Water Treatment by Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation
Water
produced water
coagulation
electro-coagulation
energy consumption
operating cost
title Performance, Energy and Cost of Produced Water Treatment by Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation
title_full Performance, Energy and Cost of Produced Water Treatment by Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation
title_fullStr Performance, Energy and Cost of Produced Water Treatment by Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation
title_full_unstemmed Performance, Energy and Cost of Produced Water Treatment by Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation
title_short Performance, Energy and Cost of Produced Water Treatment by Chemical and Electrochemical Coagulation
title_sort performance energy and cost of produced water treatment by chemical and electrochemical coagulation
topic produced water
coagulation
electro-coagulation
energy consumption
operating cost
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/12/3426
work_keys_str_mv AT chiamiangkhor performanceenergyandcostofproducedwatertreatmentbychemicalandelectrochemicalcoagulation
AT jinwenwang performanceenergyandcostofproducedwatertreatmentbychemicalandelectrochemicalcoagulation
AT minghuali performanceenergyandcostofproducedwatertreatmentbychemicalandelectrochemicalcoagulation
AT bruceaoettel performanceenergyandcostofproducedwatertreatmentbychemicalandelectrochemicalcoagulation
AT richardbkaner performanceenergyandcostofproducedwatertreatmentbychemicalandelectrochemicalcoagulation
AT davidjassby performanceenergyandcostofproducedwatertreatmentbychemicalandelectrochemicalcoagulation
AT ericmvhoek performanceenergyandcostofproducedwatertreatmentbychemicalandelectrochemicalcoagulation