Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word ‎Analysis

Introduction: The Co-word analysis has the ability to identify the intellectual structure of knowledge ‎in a research domain and reveal its subsurface research aspects.‎<br /> Objective: This study examines the intellectual structure of knowledge in the field of nanomedicine ‎during the period...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fatemeh Makkizadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iranian Society of Nanomedicine 2019-04-01
Series:Nanomedicine Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nanomedicine-rj.com/article_35946_c7ec2b547bb8f6429f036ad7de2b7418.pdf
_version_ 1819031501997604864
author Fatemeh Makkizadeh
author_facet Fatemeh Makkizadeh
author_sort Fatemeh Makkizadeh
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The Co-word analysis has the ability to identify the intellectual structure of knowledge ‎in a research domain and reveal its subsurface research aspects.‎<br /> Objective: This study examines the intellectual structure of knowledge in the field of nanomedicine ‎during the period of 2009 to 2018 by using Co-word analysis.‎<br /> Materials and Methods: This paper develops a scientometric approach about nanomedicine over a data ‎set of 2,798 documents published over a period of 10 years (2009–2018) on PubMed databases. The ‎data was analyzed using co-word, clustering methods and strategic diagram assisted by SPSS, Ucinet, ‎and VOS viewer software.‎<br /> Result: The top journal that published papers on the field was Nanomedicine (London, England). The ‎results showed that the keyword "nanoparticles" and two pairs of frequently-used keywords namely ‎‏"‏Drug delivery systems ‎‏*‏‎ Nanoparticles‏"‏‎ were the most frequent in the field of nanomedicine. ‎Application of hierarchical clustering led to the formation of 9 clusters. The cluster "Drug Delivery ‎System (emphasis on cancer)" is the core cluster and plays an effective role. The other clusters like ‎‎"Nano diagnostic", "Drug design" and "Renovated Medicine" are in marginal.‎<br /> Conclusion: This study represented that Co-Word analysis can well illustrate the intellectual structure ‎of an area. The frequency of keywords as well as formed clusters demonstrate that the majority of ‎research approaches include Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. Despite the importance of other aspects ‎as well as Nanosafety/ nanotoxicology and new medical products and equipment such as nanorobots ‎have not been considered.‎<br /> ‎
first_indexed 2024-12-21T06:47:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1d8b943dcd274a6abc2b8f37ae99ebe4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2476-3489
2476-7123
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T06:47:04Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Iranian Society of Nanomedicine
record_format Article
series Nanomedicine Research Journal
spelling doaj.art-1d8b943dcd274a6abc2b8f37ae99ebe42022-12-21T19:12:34ZengIranian Society of NanomedicineNanomedicine Research Journal2476-34892476-71232019-04-014210111010.22034/nmrj.2019.02.00735946Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word ‎AnalysisFatemeh Makkizadeh0Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, IranIntroduction: The Co-word analysis has the ability to identify the intellectual structure of knowledge ‎in a research domain and reveal its subsurface research aspects.‎<br /> Objective: This study examines the intellectual structure of knowledge in the field of nanomedicine ‎during the period of 2009 to 2018 by using Co-word analysis.‎<br /> Materials and Methods: This paper develops a scientometric approach about nanomedicine over a data ‎set of 2,798 documents published over a period of 10 years (2009–2018) on PubMed databases. The ‎data was analyzed using co-word, clustering methods and strategic diagram assisted by SPSS, Ucinet, ‎and VOS viewer software.‎<br /> Result: The top journal that published papers on the field was Nanomedicine (London, England). The ‎results showed that the keyword "nanoparticles" and two pairs of frequently-used keywords namely ‎‏"‏Drug delivery systems ‎‏*‏‎ Nanoparticles‏"‏‎ were the most frequent in the field of nanomedicine. ‎Application of hierarchical clustering led to the formation of 9 clusters. The cluster "Drug Delivery ‎System (emphasis on cancer)" is the core cluster and plays an effective role. The other clusters like ‎‎"Nano diagnostic", "Drug design" and "Renovated Medicine" are in marginal.‎<br /> Conclusion: This study represented that Co-Word analysis can well illustrate the intellectual structure ‎of an area. The frequency of keywords as well as formed clusters demonstrate that the majority of ‎research approaches include Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. Despite the importance of other aspects ‎as well as Nanosafety/ nanotoxicology and new medical products and equipment such as nanorobots ‎have not been considered.‎<br /> ‎http://www.nanomedicine-rj.com/article_35946_c7ec2b547bb8f6429f036ad7de2b7418.pdfnanomedicineco-word analysisintellectual structure. ‎‏ ‏
spellingShingle Fatemeh Makkizadeh
Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word ‎Analysis
Nanomedicine Research Journal
nanomedicine
co-word analysis
intellectual structure. ‎‏ ‏
title Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word ‎Analysis
title_full Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word ‎Analysis
title_fullStr Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word ‎Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word ‎Analysis
title_short Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word ‎Analysis
title_sort intellectual structure of knowledge in nanomedicine field 2009 to 2018 a co word ‎analysis
topic nanomedicine
co-word analysis
intellectual structure. ‎‏ ‏
url http://www.nanomedicine-rj.com/article_35946_c7ec2b547bb8f6429f036ad7de2b7418.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehmakkizadeh intellectualstructureofknowledgeinnanomedicinefield2009to2018acowordanalysis