In Defense of Moderate Inclusivism: Revisiting Rawls and Habermas on Religion in the Public Sphere
The paper discusses Rawls’ and Habermas’ theories of deliberative democracy, focusing on the question of religious reasons in political discourse. Whereas Rawls as well as Habermas defend a fully inclusivist position on the use of religious reasons in the ‘background culture’ (Rawls) or ‘informal pu...
Main Authors: | Jonas Jakobsen, Kjersti Fjørtoft |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics |
Online Access: | https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/2267 |
Similar Items
-
Jürgen Habermas and Religion in the Public Sphere
by: Javier Aguirre
Published: (2012-04-01) -
Critique of public reason revisited: Kant as arbiter between Rawls and Habermas
by: Oliveira Junior, Nythamar Hilario Fernandes de
Published: (2000-01-01) -
Democracia deliberativa: entre Rawls e Habermas = Deliberative democracy: between Rawls and Habermas
by: Rouanet, Luiz Paulo
Published: (2011-01-01) -
Critical remarks on Religion in the public sphere' – Habermas between Kant and Kierkegaard
by: Roe Fremstedal
Published: (2009-05-01) -
Den krænkede religion, Habermas, Honneth og profetens turban
by: Jonas Jakobsen
Published: (2009-05-01)