Existing evidence on the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions: a systematic map
Abstract Background Reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is vital for mitigating climate change and meeting commitments to international agreements such as the COP 21 Paris Agreement of 2015. Agriculture is reported to account for approximately 11 percent of total global GHG emissions s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Evidence |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00275-x |
| _version_ | 1797275831304716288 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexandra Mary Collins Neal Robert Haddaway James Thomas Nicola Peniston Randall Jessica Jean Taylor Albana Berberi Jessica Lauren Reid Christopher Raymond Andrews Steven James Cooke |
| author_facet | Alexandra Mary Collins Neal Robert Haddaway James Thomas Nicola Peniston Randall Jessica Jean Taylor Albana Berberi Jessica Lauren Reid Christopher Raymond Andrews Steven James Cooke |
| author_sort | Alexandra Mary Collins |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is vital for mitigating climate change and meeting commitments to international agreements such as the COP 21 Paris Agreement of 2015. Agriculture is reported to account for approximately 11 percent of total global GHG emissions such that: the agricultural sector has an important role to play in meeting climate change mitigation objectives. However, there is currently little consensus on how farm management and interventions, along with interactions with in-field variability, such as soil type, affect the production and assimilation of GHGs in arable crop lands. Practical recommendations for farmers are often vague or generalised, and models (e.g. on the amount of nitrogen fertiliser applied) are used despite limited understanding of the influence of local conditions, such as the importance of soil type. Here, we report the findings of a systematic map of the evidence relating to the impact on GHG flux from the in-field management of arable land in temperate regions. Methods We searched for, collated and catalogued research relating to the effects of in-field arable farming practices in temperate systems on GHG emissions. Results from 6 bibliographic databases, a web-based search engine and organisational websites were combined with evidence from stakeholders. Duplicates were removed and the results were then screened for relevance at title and abstract, and full-text levels according to a predefined set of eligibility criteria (following consistency checking). Relevant studies were then coded and their meta-data extracted and used to populate a systematic map database describing each study’s settings, methods and measured outcomes. Results The mapping process identified 538 relevant studies from 351 articles. Nearly all of these (96%) were found from traditional research papers, with 42% from European countries and nearly half (203 studies) lasting for 12 months or less. Over half of all studies (55%) investigated multiple interventions with chemical fertiliser (n = 100), tillage (n = 70), and organic fertiliser (n = 30) the most frequently studied single intervention types. When combining individually studied and multiple interventions, the top three intervention types most frequently studied were: chemical fertiliser (n = 312); organic fertiliser (n = 176) and tillage (n = 158). Nitrous oxide was the most commonly studied outcome, with over double the number of studies compared to carbon dioxide, the next most studied outcome. Sandy loam and silty loam were the most commonly studied soils but there was a good distribution of studies across other types. However, studies predominately focused on humid sub-tropical (Cfa) and temperate oceanic (Cfb) climates, with hot summer Mediterranean (CSa) and warm summer Mediterranean (Csb) climate zones less represented. Conclusions The mapping process identified clusters of research for chemical and organic fertiliser especially in relation to nitrous oxide emissions and for both carbon dioxide and nitrous dioxide in relation to tillage. Therefore, there is potential for further synthesis for these interventions. The spread of research across soil textures and in the humid sub-tropical and temperate oceanic climates may enable further synthesis to provide tailored in-field advice for farmers and provide an evidence base to inform subsidies policy. However, smaller amounts of research relating to biochar, cover crops, crop rotation, and nitrogen inhibitors highlight gaps where further research would be beneficial. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T15:19:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1d9d408d05624bb4916f8bfdae33a9f8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2047-2382 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T15:19:41Z |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Environmental Evidence |
| spelling | doaj.art-1d9d408d05624bb4916f8bfdae33a9f82024-03-05T17:42:47ZengBMCEnvironmental Evidence2047-23822022-06-0111112210.1186/s13750-022-00275-xExisting evidence on the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions: a systematic mapAlexandra Mary Collins0Neal Robert Haddaway1James Thomas2Nicola Peniston Randall3Jessica Jean Taylor4Albana Berberi5Jessica Lauren Reid6Christopher Raymond Andrews7Steven James Cooke8Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College LondonLeibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College LondonCentre for Evidence Based Agriculture, Harper Adams UniversityCanadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Carleton UniversityCanadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Carleton UniversityCanadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Carleton UniversityCanadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Carleton UniversityCanadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Carleton UniversityAbstract Background Reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is vital for mitigating climate change and meeting commitments to international agreements such as the COP 21 Paris Agreement of 2015. Agriculture is reported to account for approximately 11 percent of total global GHG emissions such that: the agricultural sector has an important role to play in meeting climate change mitigation objectives. However, there is currently little consensus on how farm management and interventions, along with interactions with in-field variability, such as soil type, affect the production and assimilation of GHGs in arable crop lands. Practical recommendations for farmers are often vague or generalised, and models (e.g. on the amount of nitrogen fertiliser applied) are used despite limited understanding of the influence of local conditions, such as the importance of soil type. Here, we report the findings of a systematic map of the evidence relating to the impact on GHG flux from the in-field management of arable land in temperate regions. Methods We searched for, collated and catalogued research relating to the effects of in-field arable farming practices in temperate systems on GHG emissions. Results from 6 bibliographic databases, a web-based search engine and organisational websites were combined with evidence from stakeholders. Duplicates were removed and the results were then screened for relevance at title and abstract, and full-text levels according to a predefined set of eligibility criteria (following consistency checking). Relevant studies were then coded and their meta-data extracted and used to populate a systematic map database describing each study’s settings, methods and measured outcomes. Results The mapping process identified 538 relevant studies from 351 articles. Nearly all of these (96%) were found from traditional research papers, with 42% from European countries and nearly half (203 studies) lasting for 12 months or less. Over half of all studies (55%) investigated multiple interventions with chemical fertiliser (n = 100), tillage (n = 70), and organic fertiliser (n = 30) the most frequently studied single intervention types. When combining individually studied and multiple interventions, the top three intervention types most frequently studied were: chemical fertiliser (n = 312); organic fertiliser (n = 176) and tillage (n = 158). Nitrous oxide was the most commonly studied outcome, with over double the number of studies compared to carbon dioxide, the next most studied outcome. Sandy loam and silty loam were the most commonly studied soils but there was a good distribution of studies across other types. However, studies predominately focused on humid sub-tropical (Cfa) and temperate oceanic (Cfb) climates, with hot summer Mediterranean (CSa) and warm summer Mediterranean (Csb) climate zones less represented. Conclusions The mapping process identified clusters of research for chemical and organic fertiliser especially in relation to nitrous oxide emissions and for both carbon dioxide and nitrous dioxide in relation to tillage. Therefore, there is potential for further synthesis for these interventions. The spread of research across soil textures and in the humid sub-tropical and temperate oceanic climates may enable further synthesis to provide tailored in-field advice for farmers and provide an evidence base to inform subsidies policy. However, smaller amounts of research relating to biochar, cover crops, crop rotation, and nitrogen inhibitors highlight gaps where further research would be beneficial.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00275-xCarbon emissionsGlobal warmingClimate changeClimate mitigationArable farmingFarmland management |
| spellingShingle | Alexandra Mary Collins Neal Robert Haddaway James Thomas Nicola Peniston Randall Jessica Jean Taylor Albana Berberi Jessica Lauren Reid Christopher Raymond Andrews Steven James Cooke Existing evidence on the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions: a systematic map Environmental Evidence Carbon emissions Global warming Climate change Climate mitigation Arable farming Farmland management |
| title | Existing evidence on the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions: a systematic map |
| title_full | Existing evidence on the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions: a systematic map |
| title_fullStr | Existing evidence on the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions: a systematic map |
| title_full_unstemmed | Existing evidence on the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions: a systematic map |
| title_short | Existing evidence on the impacts of within-field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions: a systematic map |
| title_sort | existing evidence on the impacts of within field farmland management practices on the flux of greenhouse gases from arable cropland in temperate regions a systematic map |
| topic | Carbon emissions Global warming Climate change Climate mitigation Arable farming Farmland management |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00275-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandramarycollins existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap AT nealroberthaddaway existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap AT jamesthomas existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap AT nicolapenistonrandall existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap AT jessicajeantaylor existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap AT albanaberberi existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap AT jessicalaurenreid existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap AT christopherraymondandrews existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap AT stevenjamescooke existingevidenceontheimpactsofwithinfieldfarmlandmanagementpracticesonthefluxofgreenhousegasesfromarablecroplandintemperateregionsasystematicmap |