Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents

Background: Residents usually cover night and weekend shifts issuing the preliminary reading of radiological studies in university hospitals. This is essential to strengthening decision-making skills when facing complex cases independently. However, there should be a balance between patient safety a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Felipe Orejuela-Zapata, Valentina Mejía-Quiñones, Ana María Granados-Sánchez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023059224
_version_ 1797732978509479936
author Juan Felipe Orejuela-Zapata
Valentina Mejía-Quiñones
Ana María Granados-Sánchez
author_facet Juan Felipe Orejuela-Zapata
Valentina Mejía-Quiñones
Ana María Granados-Sánchez
author_sort Juan Felipe Orejuela-Zapata
collection DOAJ
description Background: Residents usually cover night and weekend shifts issuing the preliminary reading of radiological studies in university hospitals. This is essential to strengthening decision-making skills when facing complex cases independently. However, there should be a balance between patient safety and academic experience since some concern has been expressed about the accuracy of the interpretations generated by trainees. This work aims to evaluate and characterize the discrepancies in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents. Material and methods: Radiologists filled out a questionnaire to evaluate preliminary reports of trainees considering diagnosis, findings description, clinical approach changes, and critical findings. Analysis was performed considering modality, imaging type, body part, and resident academic year. A Chi-square test with a significance level α of 0.05 was used to make group comparisons. Results: A total of 9072 studies were reviewed. Major and minor overall discrepancy rates were 1.7% and 8.3%, respectively. Minor discrepancy rate, findings description, and critical findings identification improved with increasing academic year, both overall and by modality. Discrepancy rates were lower for CT than MR and neuroimaging than for body-imaging studies. The highest major and minor discrepancy rates as abdomen/pelvis CT and lumbar-spine MR, respectively. Two percent of reports presented discrepancies that could generate a medical approach change. Conclusion: Discrepancy rates are low and comparable with those reported in the literature. These rates tend to improve as the resident's academic year increases. Our results suggest that radiology residents' coverage of night shifts and weekends is a practice that benefits the educational process without negatively impacting patient safety.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:21:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1dae913eaa3c47cb9403ca0ecf9bb167
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:21:23Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-1dae913eaa3c47cb9403ca0ecf9bb1672023-08-30T05:52:19ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-08-0198e18714Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residentsJuan Felipe Orejuela-Zapata0Valentina Mejía-Quiñones1Ana María Granados-Sánchez2Fundación Valle del Lili, Departamento de Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticas, Av. Simón Bolívar - Carrera 98 # 18-49, Cali, ColombiaFundación Valle del Lili, Centro Investigaciones Clínicas, Cali, Colombia; Universidad Icesi, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Cali, Colombia; Corresponding author. Fundación Valle del Lili, Av. Simón Bolívar, Carrera 98 # 18-49, Cali, Colombia.Fundación Valle del Lili, Departamento de Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticas, Av. Simón Bolívar - Carrera 98 # 18-49, Cali, Colombia; Universidad Icesi, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Cali, ColombiaBackground: Residents usually cover night and weekend shifts issuing the preliminary reading of radiological studies in university hospitals. This is essential to strengthening decision-making skills when facing complex cases independently. However, there should be a balance between patient safety and academic experience since some concern has been expressed about the accuracy of the interpretations generated by trainees. This work aims to evaluate and characterize the discrepancies in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents. Material and methods: Radiologists filled out a questionnaire to evaluate preliminary reports of trainees considering diagnosis, findings description, clinical approach changes, and critical findings. Analysis was performed considering modality, imaging type, body part, and resident academic year. A Chi-square test with a significance level α of 0.05 was used to make group comparisons. Results: A total of 9072 studies were reviewed. Major and minor overall discrepancy rates were 1.7% and 8.3%, respectively. Minor discrepancy rate, findings description, and critical findings identification improved with increasing academic year, both overall and by modality. Discrepancy rates were lower for CT than MR and neuroimaging than for body-imaging studies. The highest major and minor discrepancy rates as abdomen/pelvis CT and lumbar-spine MR, respectively. Two percent of reports presented discrepancies that could generate a medical approach change. Conclusion: Discrepancy rates are low and comparable with those reported in the literature. These rates tend to improve as the resident's academic year increases. Our results suggest that radiology residents' coverage of night shifts and weekends is a practice that benefits the educational process without negatively impacting patient safety.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023059224RadiologyDiscrepancyRadiology residentRadiologist
spellingShingle Juan Felipe Orejuela-Zapata
Valentina Mejía-Quiñones
Ana María Granados-Sánchez
Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents
Heliyon
Radiology
Discrepancy
Radiology resident
Radiologist
title Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents
title_full Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents
title_fullStr Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents
title_short Discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents
title_sort discrepancy rate and clinical impact of preliminary reports from radiology residents
topic Radiology
Discrepancy
Radiology resident
Radiologist
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023059224
work_keys_str_mv AT juanfelipeorejuelazapata discrepancyrateandclinicalimpactofpreliminaryreportsfromradiologyresidents
AT valentinamejiaquinones discrepancyrateandclinicalimpactofpreliminaryreportsfromradiologyresidents
AT anamariagranadossanchez discrepancyrateandclinicalimpactofpreliminaryreportsfromradiologyresidents