Evaluation of Crop Health Status With UAS Multispectral Imagery

This study presents the results of a field experiment conducted for assessing the crop health status of several barley and oat crop fields in Prince Edward Island, Canada. The crop fields were mapped with an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), and the crop health status was assessed through the green ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Odysseas Vlachopoulos, Brigitte Leblon, Jinfei Wang, Ataollah Haddadi, Armand LaRocque, Greg Patterson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2022-01-01
Series:IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9633165/
_version_ 1798034767769239552
author Odysseas Vlachopoulos
Brigitte Leblon
Jinfei Wang
Ataollah Haddadi
Armand LaRocque
Greg Patterson
author_facet Odysseas Vlachopoulos
Brigitte Leblon
Jinfei Wang
Ataollah Haddadi
Armand LaRocque
Greg Patterson
author_sort Odysseas Vlachopoulos
collection DOAJ
description This study presents the results of a field experiment conducted for assessing the crop health status of several barley and oat crop fields in Prince Edward Island, Canada. The crop fields were mapped with an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), and the crop health status was assessed through the green area index (GAI) and vegetation indices (VIs). GAI maps were produced from the UAS imagery and VIs used machine learning pipelines with several regression algorithms (multiple linear models, support vector machines, random forests, and artificial neural networks) along with a feature selection strategy. The random forests algorithm was shown to be the best algorithm for GAI prediction with an average relative root mean square error of 10.86% and a mean absolute error of 0.67. The resulting GAI maps and the regression feature space were classified with random forests to discriminate between vigorous and stressed crop areas. We achieved a mean overall accuracy of 94%. The limits of the study are also presented.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:48:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1db096eab6ba49f1b91832224d112ec8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2151-1535
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:48:54Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-1db096eab6ba49f1b91832224d112ec82022-12-22T04:03:54ZengIEEEIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing2151-15352022-01-011529730810.1109/JSTARS.2021.31322289633165Evaluation of Crop Health Status With UAS Multispectral ImageryOdysseas Vlachopoulos0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5407-3024Brigitte Leblon1Jinfei Wang2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8404-0530Ataollah Haddadi3Armand LaRocque4Greg Patterson5Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, London, NB, CanadaFaculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, London, NB, CanadaDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, CanadaA&L Canada Laboratories, London, ON, CanadaFaculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, London, NB, CanadaA&L Canada Laboratories, London, ON, CanadaThis study presents the results of a field experiment conducted for assessing the crop health status of several barley and oat crop fields in Prince Edward Island, Canada. The crop fields were mapped with an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), and the crop health status was assessed through the green area index (GAI) and vegetation indices (VIs). GAI maps were produced from the UAS imagery and VIs used machine learning pipelines with several regression algorithms (multiple linear models, support vector machines, random forests, and artificial neural networks) along with a feature selection strategy. The random forests algorithm was shown to be the best algorithm for GAI prediction with an average relative root mean square error of 10.86% and a mean absolute error of 0.67. The resulting GAI maps and the regression feature space were classified with random forests to discriminate between vigorous and stressed crop areas. We achieved a mean overall accuracy of 94%. The limits of the study are also presented.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9633165/Cropgreen area index (GAI)leaf area index (LAI)machine learningmultispectralprecision agriculture
spellingShingle Odysseas Vlachopoulos
Brigitte Leblon
Jinfei Wang
Ataollah Haddadi
Armand LaRocque
Greg Patterson
Evaluation of Crop Health Status With UAS Multispectral Imagery
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Crop
green area index (GAI)
leaf area index (LAI)
machine learning
multispectral
precision agriculture
title Evaluation of Crop Health Status With UAS Multispectral Imagery
title_full Evaluation of Crop Health Status With UAS Multispectral Imagery
title_fullStr Evaluation of Crop Health Status With UAS Multispectral Imagery
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Crop Health Status With UAS Multispectral Imagery
title_short Evaluation of Crop Health Status With UAS Multispectral Imagery
title_sort evaluation of crop health status with uas multispectral imagery
topic Crop
green area index (GAI)
leaf area index (LAI)
machine learning
multispectral
precision agriculture
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9633165/
work_keys_str_mv AT odysseasvlachopoulos evaluationofcrophealthstatuswithuasmultispectralimagery
AT brigitteleblon evaluationofcrophealthstatuswithuasmultispectralimagery
AT jinfeiwang evaluationofcrophealthstatuswithuasmultispectralimagery
AT ataollahhaddadi evaluationofcrophealthstatuswithuasmultispectralimagery
AT armandlarocque evaluationofcrophealthstatuswithuasmultispectralimagery
AT gregpatterson evaluationofcrophealthstatuswithuasmultispectralimagery