Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder Cancer
Recent studies showed the clinical utility of next-generation sequencing of urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). In this study, we aimed to develop urinary cfDNA analysis by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as a high-throughput and rapid assay for UBC detectio...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00755/full |
_version_ | 1818937837125369856 |
---|---|
author | Yujiro Hayashi Kazutoshi Fujita Kyosuke Matsuzaki Marie-Lisa Eich Marie-Lisa Eich Eisuke Tomiyama Makoto Matsushita Yoko Koh Kosuke Nakano Cong Wang Yu Ishizuya Taigo Kato Taigo Kato Koji Hatano Atsunari Kawashima Takeshi Ujike Motohide Uemura Motohide Uemura Ryoichi Imamura George J. Netto Norio Nonomura |
author_facet | Yujiro Hayashi Kazutoshi Fujita Kyosuke Matsuzaki Marie-Lisa Eich Marie-Lisa Eich Eisuke Tomiyama Makoto Matsushita Yoko Koh Kosuke Nakano Cong Wang Yu Ishizuya Taigo Kato Taigo Kato Koji Hatano Atsunari Kawashima Takeshi Ujike Motohide Uemura Motohide Uemura Ryoichi Imamura George J. Netto Norio Nonomura |
author_sort | Yujiro Hayashi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Recent studies showed the clinical utility of next-generation sequencing of urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). In this study, we aimed to develop urinary cfDNA analysis by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as a high-throughput and rapid assay for UBC detection and prognosis. We analyzed urinary cfDNA of 202 samples from 2 cohorts. Test cohort was designed for investigating clinical utility of urinary cfDNA, and was composed of 74 samples from patients with UBC, and 52 samples of benign hematuria patients. Validation cohort was designed for validation and assessment of clinical utility comparing urinary cfDNA with UroVysion (Abbott, Illinois, USA), and was composed of 40 samples from patients with UBC, and 36 prospectively collected samples from patients under surveillance after surgery for urothelial carcinoma. We performed ddPCR analysis of hotspot gene mutations (TERT promoter and FGFR3). In the test cohort, the sensitivity of urinary cfDNA diagnosis was 68.9% (51/74) and the specificity was 100% in patients with UBC. The sensitivity increased to 85.9% when used in conjunction with urine cytology. In addition, patients with high TERT C228T allele frequency (≥14%) had significantly worse prognosis in bladder tumor recurrence than patients with low TERT C228T allele frequency or negative TERT C228T (p = 0.0322). In the validation cohort, the sensitivity of urinary cfDNA was 57.5% (23/40) and the specificity was 100% in UBC patients. The sensitivity of the combination of urine cytology with our hotspot analysis (77.5%) was higher than that of urine cytology with UroVysion (68.9%). In the post-surgical surveillance group, patients positive for the TERT C228T mutation had significantly worse prognosis for bladder tumor recurrence than mutation negative patients (p < 0.001). In conclusion, ddPCR analysis of urinary cfDNA is a simple and promising assay for the clinical setting, surpassing UroVysion for detection and prognosis determination in UBC. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T05:58:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1dccd974f7014f8996888db2fa8234bf |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2234-943X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T05:58:18Z |
publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Oncology |
spelling | doaj.art-1dccd974f7014f8996888db2fa8234bf2022-12-21T19:50:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-05-011010.3389/fonc.2020.00755540716Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder CancerYujiro Hayashi0Kazutoshi Fujita1Kyosuke Matsuzaki2Marie-Lisa Eich3Marie-Lisa Eich4Eisuke Tomiyama5Makoto Matsushita6Yoko Koh7Kosuke Nakano8Cong Wang9Yu Ishizuya10Taigo Kato11Taigo Kato12Koji Hatano13Atsunari Kawashima14Takeshi Ujike15Motohide Uemura16Motohide Uemura17Ryoichi Imamura18George J. Netto19Norio Nonomura20Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United StatesDepartment Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Therapeutic Urologic Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Therapeutic Urologic Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanDepartment Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United StatesDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, JapanRecent studies showed the clinical utility of next-generation sequencing of urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). In this study, we aimed to develop urinary cfDNA analysis by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as a high-throughput and rapid assay for UBC detection and prognosis. We analyzed urinary cfDNA of 202 samples from 2 cohorts. Test cohort was designed for investigating clinical utility of urinary cfDNA, and was composed of 74 samples from patients with UBC, and 52 samples of benign hematuria patients. Validation cohort was designed for validation and assessment of clinical utility comparing urinary cfDNA with UroVysion (Abbott, Illinois, USA), and was composed of 40 samples from patients with UBC, and 36 prospectively collected samples from patients under surveillance after surgery for urothelial carcinoma. We performed ddPCR analysis of hotspot gene mutations (TERT promoter and FGFR3). In the test cohort, the sensitivity of urinary cfDNA diagnosis was 68.9% (51/74) and the specificity was 100% in patients with UBC. The sensitivity increased to 85.9% when used in conjunction with urine cytology. In addition, patients with high TERT C228T allele frequency (≥14%) had significantly worse prognosis in bladder tumor recurrence than patients with low TERT C228T allele frequency or negative TERT C228T (p = 0.0322). In the validation cohort, the sensitivity of urinary cfDNA was 57.5% (23/40) and the specificity was 100% in UBC patients. The sensitivity of the combination of urine cytology with our hotspot analysis (77.5%) was higher than that of urine cytology with UroVysion (68.9%). In the post-surgical surveillance group, patients positive for the TERT C228T mutation had significantly worse prognosis for bladder tumor recurrence than mutation negative patients (p < 0.001). In conclusion, ddPCR analysis of urinary cfDNA is a simple and promising assay for the clinical setting, surpassing UroVysion for detection and prognosis determination in UBC.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00755/fullbladder cancerTERT promoterFGFR3cell-free DNAliquid biopsyUroVysion |
spellingShingle | Yujiro Hayashi Kazutoshi Fujita Kyosuke Matsuzaki Marie-Lisa Eich Marie-Lisa Eich Eisuke Tomiyama Makoto Matsushita Yoko Koh Kosuke Nakano Cong Wang Yu Ishizuya Taigo Kato Taigo Kato Koji Hatano Atsunari Kawashima Takeshi Ujike Motohide Uemura Motohide Uemura Ryoichi Imamura George J. Netto Norio Nonomura Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder Cancer Frontiers in Oncology bladder cancer TERT promoter FGFR3 cell-free DNA liquid biopsy UroVysion |
title | Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder Cancer |
title_full | Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder Cancer |
title_fullStr | Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder Cancer |
title_short | Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder Cancer |
title_sort | clinical significance of hotspot mutation analysis of urinary cell free dna in urothelial bladder cancer |
topic | bladder cancer TERT promoter FGFR3 cell-free DNA liquid biopsy UroVysion |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00755/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yujirohayashi clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT kazutoshifujita clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT kyosukematsuzaki clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT marielisaeich clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT marielisaeich clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT eisuketomiyama clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT makotomatsushita clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT yokokoh clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT kosukenakano clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT congwang clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT yuishizuya clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT taigokato clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT taigokato clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT kojihatano clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT atsunarikawashima clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT takeshiujike clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT motohideuemura clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT motohideuemura clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT ryoichiimamura clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT georgejnetto clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer AT noriononomura clinicalsignificanceofhotspotmutationanalysisofurinarycellfreednainurothelialbladdercancer |