Acute and long-term outcomes of VT radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substrate

Introduction: Aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) in relation to the presence of an intramural septal substrate. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation between January 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philipp Halbfass, Deborah Ludwig, Kai Sonne, Karin Nentwich, Elena Ene, Artur Berkovitz, Borek Foldyna, Sebastian Barth, Julian Müller, Lukas Lehmkuhl, Ulrich Lüsebrink, Christian Waechter, Thomas Deneke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629221001479
_version_ 1798025139008307200
author Philipp Halbfass
Deborah Ludwig
Kai Sonne
Karin Nentwich
Elena Ene
Artur Berkovitz
Borek Foldyna
Sebastian Barth
Julian Müller
Lukas Lehmkuhl
Ulrich Lüsebrink
Christian Waechter
Thomas Deneke
author_facet Philipp Halbfass
Deborah Ludwig
Kai Sonne
Karin Nentwich
Elena Ene
Artur Berkovitz
Borek Foldyna
Sebastian Barth
Julian Müller
Lukas Lehmkuhl
Ulrich Lüsebrink
Christian Waechter
Thomas Deneke
author_sort Philipp Halbfass
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) in relation to the presence of an intramural septal substrate. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation between January 2019 and October 2020 were included. All patients were stratified based on the presence of relevant septal substrate and freedom from VT recurrences were analyzed. Results: In total, 199 consecutive patients (64.2 ± 13.0 years; 89% male; 55% ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM)) undergoing VT ablation were included. 129/199 patients (65%) showed significant septal substrate (55/90 patients (61%) with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) compared to 74/109 patients (68%) with ICM; p = 0.37). Acute procedural success with elimination of all inducible VTs was achieved in 66/70 patients (94%) without and in 103/129 patients (80%) with a septal substrate (p = 0.007). In the cohort including patients with a clinical FU, 15/60 patients (25%) without a septal substrate and 48/123 patients (39%) with a septal substrate experienced VT recurrence during a FU of 8.1 ± 5.9 months (p = 0.069). Conclusion: Presence of septal VT substrate in patients with a structural heart disease or coronary artery disease is common. Acute success of VT catheter ablation was significantly higher and mid-term success tended to be higher in patients without a septal substrate.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:13:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1de01e10e4824d23becca5029c56729c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-6292
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:13:52Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
spelling doaj.art-1de01e10e4824d23becca5029c56729c2022-12-22T04:09:58ZengElsevierIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal0972-62922022-01-0122129Acute and long-term outcomes of VT radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substratePhilipp Halbfass0Deborah Ludwig1Kai Sonne2Karin Nentwich3Elena Ene4Artur Berkovitz5Borek Foldyna6Sebastian Barth7Julian Müller8Lukas Lehmkuhl9Ulrich Lüsebrink10Christian Waechter11Thomas Deneke12Clinic for Invasive Electrophysiology/Cardiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, Germany; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany; Corresponding author. Clinic for Invasive Electrophysiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, Von-Guttenberg-Strasse 11, 97616, Bad Neustadt a.d. Saale, Germany.Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Philipps-University Marburg, GermanyClinic for Invasive Electrophysiology/Cardiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, GermanyClinic for Invasive Electrophysiology/Cardiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, GermanyClinic for Invasive Electrophysiology/Cardiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, GermanyClinic for Invasive Electrophysiology/Cardiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, GermanyCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAClinic for Invasive Electrophysiology/Cardiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, GermanyClinic for Invasive Electrophysiology/Cardiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, Germany; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Philipps-University Marburg, GermanyClinic for Radiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Philipps-University Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Philipps-University Marburg, GermanyClinic for Invasive Electrophysiology/Cardiology, Heart Center Bad Neustadt, GermanyIntroduction: Aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) in relation to the presence of an intramural septal substrate. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation between January 2019 and October 2020 were included. All patients were stratified based on the presence of relevant septal substrate and freedom from VT recurrences were analyzed. Results: In total, 199 consecutive patients (64.2 ± 13.0 years; 89% male; 55% ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM)) undergoing VT ablation were included. 129/199 patients (65%) showed significant septal substrate (55/90 patients (61%) with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) compared to 74/109 patients (68%) with ICM; p = 0.37). Acute procedural success with elimination of all inducible VTs was achieved in 66/70 patients (94%) without and in 103/129 patients (80%) with a septal substrate (p = 0.007). In the cohort including patients with a clinical FU, 15/60 patients (25%) without a septal substrate and 48/123 patients (39%) with a septal substrate experienced VT recurrence during a FU of 8.1 ± 5.9 months (p = 0.069). Conclusion: Presence of septal VT substrate in patients with a structural heart disease or coronary artery disease is common. Acute success of VT catheter ablation was significantly higher and mid-term success tended to be higher in patients without a septal substrate.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629221001479Ventricular tachycardiaSeptal substrateCatheter ablationEpicardial accessIschemic cardiomyopathyNon-ischemic cardiomyopathy
spellingShingle Philipp Halbfass
Deborah Ludwig
Kai Sonne
Karin Nentwich
Elena Ene
Artur Berkovitz
Borek Foldyna
Sebastian Barth
Julian Müller
Lukas Lehmkuhl
Ulrich Lüsebrink
Christian Waechter
Thomas Deneke
Acute and long-term outcomes of VT radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substrate
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Ventricular tachycardia
Septal substrate
Catheter ablation
Epicardial access
Ischemic cardiomyopathy
Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
title Acute and long-term outcomes of VT radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substrate
title_full Acute and long-term outcomes of VT radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substrate
title_fullStr Acute and long-term outcomes of VT radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substrate
title_full_unstemmed Acute and long-term outcomes of VT radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substrate
title_short Acute and long-term outcomes of VT radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substrate
title_sort acute and long term outcomes of vt radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with versus without an intramural septal substrate
topic Ventricular tachycardia
Septal substrate
Catheter ablation
Epicardial access
Ischemic cardiomyopathy
Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629221001479
work_keys_str_mv AT philipphalbfass acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT deborahludwig acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT kaisonne acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT karinnentwich acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT elenaene acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT arturberkovitz acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT borekfoldyna acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT sebastianbarth acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT julianmuller acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT lukaslehmkuhl acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT ulrichlusebrink acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT christianwaechter acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate
AT thomasdeneke acuteandlongtermoutcomesofvtradiofrequencycatheterablationinpatientswithversuswithoutanintramuralseptalsubstrate