Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from food-producing animals in Russia

Background and Aim: Although Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are common members of human and animal gut microbiota, their resistance to different antimicrobials makes them important pathogens. Multidrug-resistant enterococci often contaminate foods of animal origin at slaughterhouses....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dmitry A. Makarov, Olga E. Ivanova, Anastasia V. Pomazkova, Maria A. Egoreva, Olga V. Prasolova, Sergey V. Lenev, Maria A. Gergel, Nataliya K. Bukova, Sergey Yu Karabanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Veterinary World 2022-03-01
Series:Veterinary World
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.15/March-2022/9.pdf
_version_ 1818284544554434560
author Dmitry A. Makarov
Olga E. Ivanova
Anastasia V. Pomazkova
Maria A. Egoreva
Olga V. Prasolova
Sergey V. Lenev
Maria A. Gergel
Nataliya K. Bukova
Sergey Yu Karabanov
author_facet Dmitry A. Makarov
Olga E. Ivanova
Anastasia V. Pomazkova
Maria A. Egoreva
Olga V. Prasolova
Sergey V. Lenev
Maria A. Gergel
Nataliya K. Bukova
Sergey Yu Karabanov
author_sort Dmitry A. Makarov
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aim: Although Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are common members of human and animal gut microbiota, their resistance to different antimicrobials makes them important pathogens. Multidrug-resistant enterococci often contaminate foods of animal origin at slaughterhouses. The World Health Organization and the World Organization for Animal Health recommend including animal-derived enterococci in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) monitoring programs. This study aimed to fill a literature gap by determining the current AMR prevalence of E. faecalis and E. faecium from different food-producing animals in Russia. Materials and Methods: Samples of biomaterial were taken from chickens (n=187), cattle (n=155), pigs (n=49), turkeys (n=34), sheep (n=31), and ducks (n=31) raised at 28 farms in 15 regions of Russia. Isolates of E. faecalis (n=277) and of E. faecium (n=210) (487 isolates in total; 1 isolate per sample) were tested for resistance to 12 antimicrobials from 11 classes using the broth microdilution method. Three criteria were used for the interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentration: Epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) clinical breakpoints. The AMR cloud online platform was used for data processing and statistical analysis. Results: A difference of >10% was found between E. faecalis and E. faecium resistance to several antimicrobials (erythromycin, gentamycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and streptomycin). In total, resistance to most antimicrobials for enterococci isolates of both species taken from turkeys, chicken, and pigs was higher than cattle, sheep, and ducks. The highest levels were found for turkeys and the lowest for ducks. Among antimicrobials, resistance to bacitracin and virginiamycin was 88-100% in nearly all cases. High levels of clinical resistance were found for both bacteria species: Rifampicin (44-84%) from all animals, tetracycline (45-100%) from poultry and pigs, and erythromycin (60-100%), ciprofloxacin (23-100%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (33-53%) from chickens, turkeys, and pigs. No vancomycin-resistant isolates were found. Most isolates were simultaneously resistant to one–three classes of antimicrobials, and they were rarely resistant to more than three antimicrobials or sensitive to all classes. Conclusion: Differences in resistance between enterococci from different farm animals indicate that antimicrobial application is among the crucial factors determining the level of resistance. Conversely, resistance to rifampicin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin found in enterococci from farm animals in our study was notably also found in enterococci from wild animals and birds. Our results may be partly explained by the intrinsic resistance of E. faecium and E. faecalis to some antimicrobials, such as trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and bacitracin.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T00:54:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1de07c87d7f346e8b7f0f9d795b6a006
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-8988
2231-0916
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T00:54:30Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Veterinary World
record_format Article
series Veterinary World
spelling doaj.art-1de07c87d7f346e8b7f0f9d795b6a0062022-12-22T00:04:50ZengVeterinary WorldVeterinary World0972-89882231-09162022-03-0115361162110.14202/vetworld.2022.611-621Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from food-producing animals in RussiaDmitry A. Makarov0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3834-0695Olga E. Ivanova1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5030-4876Anastasia V. Pomazkova2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-8373Maria A. Egoreva3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-5195Olga V. Prasolova4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8924-2273Sergey V. Lenev5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0049-3728Maria A. Gergel6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8033-1154Nataliya K. Bukova7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5876-6020Sergey Yu Karabanov8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1688-4045Department of Food and Feed Safety, Federal State Budgetary Institution, The Russian State Center for Animal Feed and Drug Standardization and Quality (VGNKI), Moscow, Russia.Department of Biotechnology, Federal State Budgetary Institution, The Russian State Center for Animal Feed and Drug Standardization and Quality (VGNKI), Moscow, Russia.Department of Biotechnology, Federal State Budgetary Institution, The Russian State Center for Animal Feed and Drug Standardization and Quality (VGNKI), Moscow, Russia.Department of Biotechnology, Federal State Budgetary Institution, The Russian State Center for Animal Feed and Drug Standardization and Quality (VGNKI), Moscow, Russia.Department of Biotechnology, Federal State Budgetary Institution, The Russian State Center for Animal Feed and Drug Standardization and Quality (VGNKI), Moscow, Russia.Department of Biotechnology, Federal State Budgetary Institution, The Russian State Center for Animal Feed and Drug Standardization and Quality (VGNKI), Moscow, Russia.Department of Immunobiological Drugs, Federal State Budgetary Institution, The Russian State Center for Animal Feed and Drug Standardization and Quality (VGNKI), Moscow, Russia.Testing Centre, Federal State Budgetary Institution The Russian State Center for Animal Feed and Drug Standardization and Quality (VGNKI), Moscow, Russia.Department of Experimental Clinic and Research Laboratory for Bioactive Substances of Animal Origin, V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems, Moscow, Russia.Background and Aim: Although Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are common members of human and animal gut microbiota, their resistance to different antimicrobials makes them important pathogens. Multidrug-resistant enterococci often contaminate foods of animal origin at slaughterhouses. The World Health Organization and the World Organization for Animal Health recommend including animal-derived enterococci in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) monitoring programs. This study aimed to fill a literature gap by determining the current AMR prevalence of E. faecalis and E. faecium from different food-producing animals in Russia. Materials and Methods: Samples of biomaterial were taken from chickens (n=187), cattle (n=155), pigs (n=49), turkeys (n=34), sheep (n=31), and ducks (n=31) raised at 28 farms in 15 regions of Russia. Isolates of E. faecalis (n=277) and of E. faecium (n=210) (487 isolates in total; 1 isolate per sample) were tested for resistance to 12 antimicrobials from 11 classes using the broth microdilution method. Three criteria were used for the interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentration: Epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) clinical breakpoints. The AMR cloud online platform was used for data processing and statistical analysis. Results: A difference of >10% was found between E. faecalis and E. faecium resistance to several antimicrobials (erythromycin, gentamycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and streptomycin). In total, resistance to most antimicrobials for enterococci isolates of both species taken from turkeys, chicken, and pigs was higher than cattle, sheep, and ducks. The highest levels were found for turkeys and the lowest for ducks. Among antimicrobials, resistance to bacitracin and virginiamycin was 88-100% in nearly all cases. High levels of clinical resistance were found for both bacteria species: Rifampicin (44-84%) from all animals, tetracycline (45-100%) from poultry and pigs, and erythromycin (60-100%), ciprofloxacin (23-100%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (33-53%) from chickens, turkeys, and pigs. No vancomycin-resistant isolates were found. Most isolates were simultaneously resistant to one–three classes of antimicrobials, and they were rarely resistant to more than three antimicrobials or sensitive to all classes. Conclusion: Differences in resistance between enterococci from different farm animals indicate that antimicrobial application is among the crucial factors determining the level of resistance. Conversely, resistance to rifampicin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin found in enterococci from farm animals in our study was notably also found in enterococci from wild animals and birds. Our results may be partly explained by the intrinsic resistance of E. faecium and E. faecalis to some antimicrobials, such as trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and bacitracin.http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.15/March-2022/9.pdfanimalsantimicrobial resistanceenterococcienterococcus faeciumenterococcus faecalislivestock
spellingShingle Dmitry A. Makarov
Olga E. Ivanova
Anastasia V. Pomazkova
Maria A. Egoreva
Olga V. Prasolova
Sergey V. Lenev
Maria A. Gergel
Nataliya K. Bukova
Sergey Yu Karabanov
Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from food-producing animals in Russia
Veterinary World
animals
antimicrobial resistance
enterococci
enterococcus faecium
enterococcus faecalis
livestock
title Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from food-producing animals in Russia
title_full Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from food-producing animals in Russia
title_fullStr Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from food-producing animals in Russia
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from food-producing animals in Russia
title_short Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from food-producing animals in Russia
title_sort antimicrobial resistance of commensal enterococcus faecalis and enterococcus faecium from food producing animals in russia
topic animals
antimicrobial resistance
enterococci
enterococcus faecium
enterococcus faecalis
livestock
url http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.15/March-2022/9.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dmitryamakarov antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia
AT olgaeivanova antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia
AT anastasiavpomazkova antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia
AT mariaaegoreva antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia
AT olgavprasolova antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia
AT sergeyvlenev antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia
AT mariaagergel antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia
AT nataliyakbukova antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia
AT sergeyyukarabanov antimicrobialresistanceofcommensalenterococcusfaecalisandenterococcusfaeciumfromfoodproducinganimalsinrussia