Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls

Introduction: Circulating fetal cells isolated from maternal blood can be used for prenatal testing, representing a safe alternative to invasive testing. The present study investigated the potential of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for diagnosing monogenic disorders dependent on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Line Dahl Jeppesen, Lotte Hatt, Ripudaman Singh, Palle Schelde, Katarina Ravn, Christian Liebst Toft, Maria Bach Laursen, Jakob Hedegaard, Inga Baasch Christensen, Bolette Hestbek Nicolaisen, Lotte Andreasen, Lars Henning Pedersen, Ida Vogel, Dorte Launholt Lildballe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1188472/full
_version_ 1827805604041719808
author Line Dahl Jeppesen
Line Dahl Jeppesen
Lotte Hatt
Ripudaman Singh
Palle Schelde
Katarina Ravn
Christian Liebst Toft
Christian Liebst Toft
Maria Bach Laursen
Jakob Hedegaard
Inga Baasch Christensen
Bolette Hestbek Nicolaisen
Lotte Andreasen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
Dorte Launholt Lildballe
Dorte Launholt Lildballe
author_facet Line Dahl Jeppesen
Line Dahl Jeppesen
Lotte Hatt
Ripudaman Singh
Palle Schelde
Katarina Ravn
Christian Liebst Toft
Christian Liebst Toft
Maria Bach Laursen
Jakob Hedegaard
Inga Baasch Christensen
Bolette Hestbek Nicolaisen
Lotte Andreasen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
Dorte Launholt Lildballe
Dorte Launholt Lildballe
author_sort Line Dahl Jeppesen
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Circulating fetal cells isolated from maternal blood can be used for prenatal testing, representing a safe alternative to invasive testing. The present study investigated the potential of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for diagnosing monogenic disorders dependent on the mode of inheritance.Methods: Maternal blood samples were collected from women opting for prenatal diagnostics for specific monogenic disorders (N = 7). Fetal trophoblasts were enriched and stained using magnetic activated cell sorting and isolated by fluorescens activated single-cell sorting. Individual cells were subject to whole genome amplification, and cells of fetal origin were identified by DNA-profiling using short tandem repeat markers. The amplified fetal DNA was input for genetic testing for autosomal dominant-, autosomal recessive-, X-linked and repeat expansion disorders by direct variant analysis and haplotyping. The cell-based NIPT results were compared with those of invasive testing.Results: In two cases at risk of skeletal dysplasia, caused by variants in the FGFR3 gene (autosomal dominant disorders), cell-based NIPT correctly stated an affected fetus, but allelic dropout of the normal alleles were observed in both cases. Cell-based NIPT gave an accurate result in two cases at risk of autosomal recessive disorders, where the parents carried either different diastrophic dysplasia causing variants in the SLC26A2 gene or the same cystic fibrosis disease-causing variant in the CFTR gene. Cell-based NIPT accurately identified an affected male fetus in a pregnancy at risk of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD gene, X-linked recessive disorders). In two cases at risk of the myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DMPK gene, repeat expansion disorder), cell-based NIPT correctly detected an affected and an unaffected fetus, respectively.Discussion: Circulating fetal cells can be used to detect both maternally- and paternally inherited monogenic disorders irrespective of the type of variant, however, the risk of allelic dropout must be considered. We conclude that the clinical interpretation of the cell-based NIPT result thus varies depending on the disorders’ mode of inheritance.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:28:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1de434c9e29148f39b2d71fd2aed3f72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-8021
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:28:29Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genetics
spelling doaj.art-1de434c9e29148f39b2d71fd2aed3f722023-09-27T14:04:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212023-09-011410.3389/fgene.2023.11884721188472Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfallsLine Dahl Jeppesen0Line Dahl Jeppesen1Lotte Hatt2Ripudaman Singh3Palle Schelde4Katarina Ravn5Christian Liebst Toft6Christian Liebst Toft7Maria Bach Laursen8Jakob Hedegaard9Inga Baasch Christensen10Bolette Hestbek Nicolaisen11Lotte Andreasen12Lars Henning Pedersen13Lars Henning Pedersen14Lars Henning Pedersen15Ida Vogel16Ida Vogel17Dorte Launholt Lildballe18Dorte Launholt Lildballe19ARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkCenter for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DenmarkCenter for Preimplantation Genetic Testing, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkCenter for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkCenter for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkIntroduction: Circulating fetal cells isolated from maternal blood can be used for prenatal testing, representing a safe alternative to invasive testing. The present study investigated the potential of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for diagnosing monogenic disorders dependent on the mode of inheritance.Methods: Maternal blood samples were collected from women opting for prenatal diagnostics for specific monogenic disorders (N = 7). Fetal trophoblasts were enriched and stained using magnetic activated cell sorting and isolated by fluorescens activated single-cell sorting. Individual cells were subject to whole genome amplification, and cells of fetal origin were identified by DNA-profiling using short tandem repeat markers. The amplified fetal DNA was input for genetic testing for autosomal dominant-, autosomal recessive-, X-linked and repeat expansion disorders by direct variant analysis and haplotyping. The cell-based NIPT results were compared with those of invasive testing.Results: In two cases at risk of skeletal dysplasia, caused by variants in the FGFR3 gene (autosomal dominant disorders), cell-based NIPT correctly stated an affected fetus, but allelic dropout of the normal alleles were observed in both cases. Cell-based NIPT gave an accurate result in two cases at risk of autosomal recessive disorders, where the parents carried either different diastrophic dysplasia causing variants in the SLC26A2 gene or the same cystic fibrosis disease-causing variant in the CFTR gene. Cell-based NIPT accurately identified an affected male fetus in a pregnancy at risk of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD gene, X-linked recessive disorders). In two cases at risk of the myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DMPK gene, repeat expansion disorder), cell-based NIPT correctly detected an affected and an unaffected fetus, respectively.Discussion: Circulating fetal cells can be used to detect both maternally- and paternally inherited monogenic disorders irrespective of the type of variant, however, the risk of allelic dropout must be considered. We conclude that the clinical interpretation of the cell-based NIPT result thus varies depending on the disorders’ mode of inheritance.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1188472/fullnoninvasive prenatal testingfetal cellsextravillous trophoblastsmonogenic disordersrepeat expansion disordersclinical interpretation
spellingShingle Line Dahl Jeppesen
Line Dahl Jeppesen
Lotte Hatt
Ripudaman Singh
Palle Schelde
Katarina Ravn
Christian Liebst Toft
Christian Liebst Toft
Maria Bach Laursen
Jakob Hedegaard
Inga Baasch Christensen
Bolette Hestbek Nicolaisen
Lotte Andreasen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Lars Henning Pedersen
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
Dorte Launholt Lildballe
Dorte Launholt Lildballe
Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
Frontiers in Genetics
noninvasive prenatal testing
fetal cells
extravillous trophoblasts
monogenic disorders
repeat expansion disorders
clinical interpretation
title Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_full Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_fullStr Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_full_unstemmed Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_short Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls
title_sort clinical interpretation of cell based non invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders potentials and pitfalls
topic noninvasive prenatal testing
fetal cells
extravillous trophoblasts
monogenic disorders
repeat expansion disorders
clinical interpretation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1188472/full
work_keys_str_mv AT linedahljeppesen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT linedahljeppesen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT lottehatt clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT ripudamansingh clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT palleschelde clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT katarinaravn clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT christianliebsttoft clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT christianliebsttoft clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT mariabachlaursen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT jakobhedegaard clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT ingabaaschchristensen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT bolettehestbeknicolaisen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT lotteandreasen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT larshenningpedersen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT larshenningpedersen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT larshenningpedersen clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT idavogel clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT idavogel clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT dortelaunholtlildballe clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls
AT dortelaunholtlildballe clinicalinterpretationofcellbasednoninvasiveprenataltestingformonogenicdisordersincludingrepeatexpansiondisorderspotentialsandpitfalls