Trajectories of Energy Intake Distribution and Risk of Dyslipidemia: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2018)

Few studies have examined the secular trend of energy intake distribution. This study aims to describe trajectories of energy intake distribution and determine their association with dyslipidemia risk. Data of 2843 adult participants from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) were analyzed. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoyun Song, Huijun Wang, Chang Su, Zhihong Wang, Wenwen Du, Feifei Huang, Jiguo Zhang, Xiaofang Jia, Hongru Jiang, Yifei Ouyang, Li Li, Jing Bai, Xiaofan Zhang, Gangqiang Ding, Bing Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3488
_version_ 1797513535933120512
author Xiaoyun Song
Huijun Wang
Chang Su
Zhihong Wang
Wenwen Du
Feifei Huang
Jiguo Zhang
Xiaofang Jia
Hongru Jiang
Yifei Ouyang
Li Li
Jing Bai
Xiaofan Zhang
Gangqiang Ding
Bing Zhang
author_facet Xiaoyun Song
Huijun Wang
Chang Su
Zhihong Wang
Wenwen Du
Feifei Huang
Jiguo Zhang
Xiaofang Jia
Hongru Jiang
Yifei Ouyang
Li Li
Jing Bai
Xiaofan Zhang
Gangqiang Ding
Bing Zhang
author_sort Xiaoyun Song
collection DOAJ
description Few studies have examined the secular trend of energy intake distribution. This study aims to describe trajectories of energy intake distribution and determine their association with dyslipidemia risk. Data of 2843 adult participants from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) were analyzed. Trajectory groups of energy intake distribution were identified by multi-trajectory model over 27 years. Multilevel mixed-effects modified Poisson regression with robust estimation of variance was used to calculate risk ratio for incident dyslipidemia in a 9-year follow-up. Four trajectory groups were identified: “Energy evenly distributed group” (Group 1), “Lunch and dinner energy dominant group” (Group 2), “Dinner energy dominant group” (Group 3), “breakfast and dinner energy dominant group” (Group 4). Compared with Group 1, Group 3 was associated with higher risk of dyslipidemia (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.75), hypercholesterolemia (RR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.37, 2.81) and high low-density lipoproteins cholesterols (LDL-C) (RR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.82, 3.20). A U-shape was observed between cumulative average proportion of dinner energy and dyslipidemia risk (<i>p</i> for non-linear = 0.01), with stronger relationship at 40% and above. Energy intake distribution characterized by higher proportion of dinner energy, especially over 40% was associated with higher dyslipidemia risk in Chinese adults.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:17:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1dfe020a835f4e63969b52f21b6da8a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6643
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:17:56Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nutrients
spelling doaj.art-1dfe020a835f4e63969b52f21b6da8a42023-11-22T19:29:19ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432021-10-011310348810.3390/nu13103488Trajectories of Energy Intake Distribution and Risk of Dyslipidemia: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2018)Xiaoyun Song0Huijun Wang1Chang Su2Zhihong Wang3Wenwen Du4Feifei Huang5Jiguo Zhang6Xiaofang Jia7Hongru Jiang8Yifei Ouyang9Li Li10Jing Bai11Xiaofan Zhang12Gangqiang Ding13Bing Zhang14Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, ChinaFew studies have examined the secular trend of energy intake distribution. This study aims to describe trajectories of energy intake distribution and determine their association with dyslipidemia risk. Data of 2843 adult participants from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) were analyzed. Trajectory groups of energy intake distribution were identified by multi-trajectory model over 27 years. Multilevel mixed-effects modified Poisson regression with robust estimation of variance was used to calculate risk ratio for incident dyslipidemia in a 9-year follow-up. Four trajectory groups were identified: “Energy evenly distributed group” (Group 1), “Lunch and dinner energy dominant group” (Group 2), “Dinner energy dominant group” (Group 3), “breakfast and dinner energy dominant group” (Group 4). Compared with Group 1, Group 3 was associated with higher risk of dyslipidemia (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.75), hypercholesterolemia (RR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.37, 2.81) and high low-density lipoproteins cholesterols (LDL-C) (RR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.82, 3.20). A U-shape was observed between cumulative average proportion of dinner energy and dyslipidemia risk (<i>p</i> for non-linear = 0.01), with stronger relationship at 40% and above. Energy intake distribution characterized by higher proportion of dinner energy, especially over 40% was associated with higher dyslipidemia risk in Chinese adults.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3488energy intakedyslipidemiamulti-trajectory modelcohort
spellingShingle Xiaoyun Song
Huijun Wang
Chang Su
Zhihong Wang
Wenwen Du
Feifei Huang
Jiguo Zhang
Xiaofang Jia
Hongru Jiang
Yifei Ouyang
Li Li
Jing Bai
Xiaofan Zhang
Gangqiang Ding
Bing Zhang
Trajectories of Energy Intake Distribution and Risk of Dyslipidemia: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2018)
Nutrients
energy intake
dyslipidemia
multi-trajectory model
cohort
title Trajectories of Energy Intake Distribution and Risk of Dyslipidemia: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2018)
title_full Trajectories of Energy Intake Distribution and Risk of Dyslipidemia: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2018)
title_fullStr Trajectories of Energy Intake Distribution and Risk of Dyslipidemia: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2018)
title_full_unstemmed Trajectories of Energy Intake Distribution and Risk of Dyslipidemia: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2018)
title_short Trajectories of Energy Intake Distribution and Risk of Dyslipidemia: Findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991–2018)
title_sort trajectories of energy intake distribution and risk of dyslipidemia findings from the china health and nutrition survey 1991 2018
topic energy intake
dyslipidemia
multi-trajectory model
cohort
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3488
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyunsong trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT huijunwang trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT changsu trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT zhihongwang trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT wenwendu trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT feifeihuang trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT jiguozhang trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT xiaofangjia trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT hongrujiang trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT yifeiouyang trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT lili trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT jingbai trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT xiaofanzhang trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT gangqiangding trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018
AT bingzhang trajectoriesofenergyintakedistributionandriskofdyslipidemiafindingsfromthechinahealthandnutritionsurvey19912018