Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal

IntroductionThe incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in organizations is pivotal to deal with work-related tasks and challenges effectively, yet little is known about the organizational factors that influence AI acceptance (i.e., employee favorable AI attitudes and AI use). To address this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyriaki Fousiani, Georgios Michelakis, Pieter A. Minnigh, Kiki M. M. De Jonge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359164/full
_version_ 1797243488084951040
author Kyriaki Fousiani
Georgios Michelakis
Pieter A. Minnigh
Kiki M. M. De Jonge
Kiki M. M. De Jonge
author_facet Kyriaki Fousiani
Georgios Michelakis
Pieter A. Minnigh
Kiki M. M. De Jonge
Kiki M. M. De Jonge
author_sort Kyriaki Fousiani
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionThe incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in organizations is pivotal to deal with work-related tasks and challenges effectively, yet little is known about the organizational factors that influence AI acceptance (i.e., employee favorable AI attitudes and AI use). To address this limitation in the literature and provide insight into the organizational antecedents influencing AI acceptance, this research investigated the relationship between competitive organizational climate and AI acceptance among employees. Moreover, given the critical role of a leader in employee attitude and behavior, we examined the moderating role of leaders’ power construal as responsibility or as opportunity in this relationship.MethodsStudy 1 was a three-wave field study among employees (N = 237, Mage = 38.28) working in various organizations in the UK. The study measured employees’ perception of a competitive organizational climate at Time 1, leaders’ power construal (as perceived by employees) at Time 2, and employee attitudes towards AI and their actual use of AI in the workplace at Times 2 and 3. Study 2 was a 2 (climate: highly competitive vs. low competitive) by 2 (power construal: responsibility vs. opportunity) experiment among employee participants (N = 150, Mage = 37.50).ResultsStudy 1 demonstrated a positive relationship between competitive climate and employee AI use over time. Furthermore, both studies revealed an interaction between competitive climate and leader’s power construal in the prediction of employee AI acceptance: In Study 1, competitive climate was negatively related to AI acceptance over time when leaders construed power as opportunity. In Study 2 competitive climate was positively related to AI acceptance when leaders construed power as responsibility rather than as opportunity.DiscussionThese results underscore the organizational factors that are required in order for employees to shape favorable attitudes towards AI and actually use AI at work. Importantly, this research expands the limited body of literature on AI integration in organizations.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:55:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e04d42d12a54299b8dfc53762207e1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:55:54Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-1e04d42d12a54299b8dfc53762207e1b2024-03-26T16:41:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782024-03-011510.3389/fpsyg.2024.13591641359164Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construalKyriaki Fousiani0Georgios Michelakis1Pieter A. Minnigh2Kiki M. M. De Jonge3Kiki M. M. De Jonge4Department of Psychology, Organizational Psychology Section, University of Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Organizational Psychology Section, University of Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsIndependent Researcher, Groningen, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Organizational Psychology Section, University of Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsGroeiflow, Groningen, NetherlandsIntroductionThe incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in organizations is pivotal to deal with work-related tasks and challenges effectively, yet little is known about the organizational factors that influence AI acceptance (i.e., employee favorable AI attitudes and AI use). To address this limitation in the literature and provide insight into the organizational antecedents influencing AI acceptance, this research investigated the relationship between competitive organizational climate and AI acceptance among employees. Moreover, given the critical role of a leader in employee attitude and behavior, we examined the moderating role of leaders’ power construal as responsibility or as opportunity in this relationship.MethodsStudy 1 was a three-wave field study among employees (N = 237, Mage = 38.28) working in various organizations in the UK. The study measured employees’ perception of a competitive organizational climate at Time 1, leaders’ power construal (as perceived by employees) at Time 2, and employee attitudes towards AI and their actual use of AI in the workplace at Times 2 and 3. Study 2 was a 2 (climate: highly competitive vs. low competitive) by 2 (power construal: responsibility vs. opportunity) experiment among employee participants (N = 150, Mage = 37.50).ResultsStudy 1 demonstrated a positive relationship between competitive climate and employee AI use over time. Furthermore, both studies revealed an interaction between competitive climate and leader’s power construal in the prediction of employee AI acceptance: In Study 1, competitive climate was negatively related to AI acceptance over time when leaders construed power as opportunity. In Study 2 competitive climate was positively related to AI acceptance when leaders construed power as responsibility rather than as opportunity.DiscussionThese results underscore the organizational factors that are required in order for employees to shape favorable attitudes towards AI and actually use AI at work. Importantly, this research expands the limited body of literature on AI integration in organizations.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359164/fullcompetitive organizational climateartificial intelligence (AI) acceptance in organizationsleadershippower construalpower as responsibilitypower as opportunity
spellingShingle Kyriaki Fousiani
Georgios Michelakis
Pieter A. Minnigh
Kiki M. M. De Jonge
Kiki M. M. De Jonge
Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal
Frontiers in Psychology
competitive organizational climate
artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance in organizations
leadership
power construal
power as responsibility
power as opportunity
title Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal
title_full Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal
title_fullStr Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal
title_full_unstemmed Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal
title_short Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal
title_sort competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence ai acceptance the moderating role of leaders power construal
topic competitive organizational climate
artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance in organizations
leadership
power construal
power as responsibility
power as opportunity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359164/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kyriakifousiani competitiveorganizationalclimateandartificialintelligenceaiacceptancethemoderatingroleofleaderspowerconstrual
AT georgiosmichelakis competitiveorganizationalclimateandartificialintelligenceaiacceptancethemoderatingroleofleaderspowerconstrual
AT pieteraminnigh competitiveorganizationalclimateandartificialintelligenceaiacceptancethemoderatingroleofleaderspowerconstrual
AT kikimmdejonge competitiveorganizationalclimateandartificialintelligenceaiacceptancethemoderatingroleofleaderspowerconstrual
AT kikimmdejonge competitiveorganizationalclimateandartificialintelligenceaiacceptancethemoderatingroleofleaderspowerconstrual