Prevalence of dural ectasia in Loeys-Dietz syndrome: comparison with Marfan syndrome and normal controls.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dural ectasia is well recognized in Marfan syndrome (MFS) as one of the major diagnostic criteria, but the exact prevalence of dural ectasia is still unknown in Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), which is a recently discovered connective tissue disease. In this study, we evaluated t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atsushi K Kono, Masahiro Higashi, Hiroko Morisaki, Takayuki Morisaki, Hiroaki Naito, Kazuro Sugimura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3783378?pdf=render
_version_ 1828899520040140800
author Atsushi K Kono
Masahiro Higashi
Hiroko Morisaki
Takayuki Morisaki
Hiroaki Naito
Kazuro Sugimura
author_facet Atsushi K Kono
Masahiro Higashi
Hiroko Morisaki
Takayuki Morisaki
Hiroaki Naito
Kazuro Sugimura
author_sort Atsushi K Kono
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dural ectasia is well recognized in Marfan syndrome (MFS) as one of the major diagnostic criteria, but the exact prevalence of dural ectasia is still unknown in Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), which is a recently discovered connective tissue disease. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of dural ectasia in LDS according by using qualitative and quantitative methods and compared our findings with those for with MFS and normal controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 10 LDS (6 males, 4 females, mean age 36.3 years) and 20 MFS cases (12 males, 8 females, mean age 37.1 years) and 20 controls (12 males, 8 females, mean age 36.1 years) both qualitatively and quantitatively using axial CT images and sagittal multi-planar reconstruction images of the lumbosacral region. For quantitative examination, we adopted two methods: method-1 (anteroposterior dural diameter of S1> L4) and method-2 (ratio of anteroposterior dural diameter/vertebral body diameter>cutoff values). The prevalence of dural ectasia among groups was compared by using Fisher's exact test and the Tukey-Kramer test. RESULTS: In LDS patients, the qualitative method showed 40% of dural ectasia, the quantitative method-1 50%, and the method-2 70%. In MFS patients, the corresponding prevalences were 50%, 75%, and 85%, and in controls, 0%, 0%, and 5%. Both LDS and MFS had a significantly wider dura than controls. CONCLUSIONS: While the prevalence of dural ectasia varied depending on differences in qualitative and quantitative methods, LDS as well as MFS, showed, regardless of method, a higher prevalence of dural ectasia than controls. This finding should help the differentiation of LDS from controls.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:33:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e07a4709e1f4a689dc652b8df8250c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:33:25Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-1e07a4709e1f4a689dc652b8df8250c52022-12-21T23:40:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7526410.1371/journal.pone.0075264Prevalence of dural ectasia in Loeys-Dietz syndrome: comparison with Marfan syndrome and normal controls.Atsushi K KonoMasahiro HigashiHiroko MorisakiTakayuki MorisakiHiroaki NaitoKazuro SugimuraBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dural ectasia is well recognized in Marfan syndrome (MFS) as one of the major diagnostic criteria, but the exact prevalence of dural ectasia is still unknown in Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), which is a recently discovered connective tissue disease. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of dural ectasia in LDS according by using qualitative and quantitative methods and compared our findings with those for with MFS and normal controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 10 LDS (6 males, 4 females, mean age 36.3 years) and 20 MFS cases (12 males, 8 females, mean age 37.1 years) and 20 controls (12 males, 8 females, mean age 36.1 years) both qualitatively and quantitatively using axial CT images and sagittal multi-planar reconstruction images of the lumbosacral region. For quantitative examination, we adopted two methods: method-1 (anteroposterior dural diameter of S1> L4) and method-2 (ratio of anteroposterior dural diameter/vertebral body diameter>cutoff values). The prevalence of dural ectasia among groups was compared by using Fisher's exact test and the Tukey-Kramer test. RESULTS: In LDS patients, the qualitative method showed 40% of dural ectasia, the quantitative method-1 50%, and the method-2 70%. In MFS patients, the corresponding prevalences were 50%, 75%, and 85%, and in controls, 0%, 0%, and 5%. Both LDS and MFS had a significantly wider dura than controls. CONCLUSIONS: While the prevalence of dural ectasia varied depending on differences in qualitative and quantitative methods, LDS as well as MFS, showed, regardless of method, a higher prevalence of dural ectasia than controls. This finding should help the differentiation of LDS from controls.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3783378?pdf=render
spellingShingle Atsushi K Kono
Masahiro Higashi
Hiroko Morisaki
Takayuki Morisaki
Hiroaki Naito
Kazuro Sugimura
Prevalence of dural ectasia in Loeys-Dietz syndrome: comparison with Marfan syndrome and normal controls.
PLoS ONE
title Prevalence of dural ectasia in Loeys-Dietz syndrome: comparison with Marfan syndrome and normal controls.
title_full Prevalence of dural ectasia in Loeys-Dietz syndrome: comparison with Marfan syndrome and normal controls.
title_fullStr Prevalence of dural ectasia in Loeys-Dietz syndrome: comparison with Marfan syndrome and normal controls.
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of dural ectasia in Loeys-Dietz syndrome: comparison with Marfan syndrome and normal controls.
title_short Prevalence of dural ectasia in Loeys-Dietz syndrome: comparison with Marfan syndrome and normal controls.
title_sort prevalence of dural ectasia in loeys dietz syndrome comparison with marfan syndrome and normal controls
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3783378?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT atsushikkono prevalenceofduralectasiainloeysdietzsyndromecomparisonwithmarfansyndromeandnormalcontrols
AT masahirohigashi prevalenceofduralectasiainloeysdietzsyndromecomparisonwithmarfansyndromeandnormalcontrols
AT hirokomorisaki prevalenceofduralectasiainloeysdietzsyndromecomparisonwithmarfansyndromeandnormalcontrols
AT takayukimorisaki prevalenceofduralectasiainloeysdietzsyndromecomparisonwithmarfansyndromeandnormalcontrols
AT hiroakinaito prevalenceofduralectasiainloeysdietzsyndromecomparisonwithmarfansyndromeandnormalcontrols
AT kazurosugimura prevalenceofduralectasiainloeysdietzsyndromecomparisonwithmarfansyndromeandnormalcontrols