The Morphology of Prometheus, Literary Geography and the Geoethical Project

This paper explores mappings, musings and ‘thought experiments’ in literary geography to consider how they may contribute to geoethical pedagogy and research. Representations of Prometheus from the fourteenth century onwards have traveled along three broad symbological roads: first, as the creator,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Charles Travis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Geosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/11/8/340
_version_ 1797523685493440512
author Charles Travis
author_facet Charles Travis
author_sort Charles Travis
collection DOAJ
description This paper explores mappings, musings and ‘thought experiments’ in literary geography to consider how they may contribute to geoethical pedagogy and research. Representations of Prometheus from the fourteenth century onwards have traveled along three broad symbological roads: first, as the creator, and bringer of fire; second as a bound figure in chains, and thirdly, unbound. However, it was the harnessing of fire by our species a millennium prior that gave rise to the myth of Prometheus and set into motion the geophysical process of combustion which “facilitated the transformation of much of the terrestrial surface […] and in the process pushed the parameters of the earth system into a new geological epoch.” As the geophysicist Professor Michael Mann observes, global warming and loss of biodiversity constitutes an ethical problem. The remediation of the Prometheus myth in Mary Shelley’s <i>Frankenstein; or the modern Prometheus</i> (1818), Jonathan Fetter-Vorm’s <i>Trinity: A Graphic History of the First Atomic Bomb</i> (2012) and William Golding’s novel <i>Lord of the Flies</i> (1954) provides the means to explore the geographical, historical and cultural contingencies of geoethical dilemmas contributing to the framing of the Anthropocene and <i>Gaia</i> heuristics. This paper argues for the necessity of scholars in the arts, humanities and geosciences to share and exchange idiographic and nomothetic perspectives in order to forge a geoethical dialectic that fuses poetic and positivistic methods into transcendent ontologies and epistemologies to address the existential questions of global warming and loss of biodiversity as we enter the age of the Anthropocene.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:46:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e121e1679e74ff78273857ec3e8b7a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3263
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:46:32Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Geosciences
spelling doaj.art-1e121e1679e74ff78273857ec3e8b7a52023-11-22T07:48:00ZengMDPI AGGeosciences2076-32632021-08-0111834010.3390/geosciences11080340The Morphology of Prometheus, Literary Geography and the Geoethical ProjectCharles Travis0Department of History, University of Texas, Arlington, TX 76019, USAThis paper explores mappings, musings and ‘thought experiments’ in literary geography to consider how they may contribute to geoethical pedagogy and research. Representations of Prometheus from the fourteenth century onwards have traveled along three broad symbological roads: first, as the creator, and bringer of fire; second as a bound figure in chains, and thirdly, unbound. However, it was the harnessing of fire by our species a millennium prior that gave rise to the myth of Prometheus and set into motion the geophysical process of combustion which “facilitated the transformation of much of the terrestrial surface […] and in the process pushed the parameters of the earth system into a new geological epoch.” As the geophysicist Professor Michael Mann observes, global warming and loss of biodiversity constitutes an ethical problem. The remediation of the Prometheus myth in Mary Shelley’s <i>Frankenstein; or the modern Prometheus</i> (1818), Jonathan Fetter-Vorm’s <i>Trinity: A Graphic History of the First Atomic Bomb</i> (2012) and William Golding’s novel <i>Lord of the Flies</i> (1954) provides the means to explore the geographical, historical and cultural contingencies of geoethical dilemmas contributing to the framing of the Anthropocene and <i>Gaia</i> heuristics. This paper argues for the necessity of scholars in the arts, humanities and geosciences to share and exchange idiographic and nomothetic perspectives in order to forge a geoethical dialectic that fuses poetic and positivistic methods into transcendent ontologies and epistemologies to address the existential questions of global warming and loss of biodiversity as we enter the age of the Anthropocene.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/11/8/340literary geographygeoethicsPrometheusArendtBenjamincombustion cultures
spellingShingle Charles Travis
The Morphology of Prometheus, Literary Geography and the Geoethical Project
Geosciences
literary geography
geoethics
Prometheus
Arendt
Benjamin
combustion cultures
title The Morphology of Prometheus, Literary Geography and the Geoethical Project
title_full The Morphology of Prometheus, Literary Geography and the Geoethical Project
title_fullStr The Morphology of Prometheus, Literary Geography and the Geoethical Project
title_full_unstemmed The Morphology of Prometheus, Literary Geography and the Geoethical Project
title_short The Morphology of Prometheus, Literary Geography and the Geoethical Project
title_sort morphology of prometheus literary geography and the geoethical project
topic literary geography
geoethics
Prometheus
Arendt
Benjamin
combustion cultures
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/11/8/340
work_keys_str_mv AT charlestravis themorphologyofprometheusliterarygeographyandthegeoethicalproject
AT charlestravis morphologyofprometheusliterarygeographyandthegeoethicalproject