An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis

Background: Leg length and hip offset are important principles in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients may endorse leg length differences (LLD) postoperatively that may be anatomical or functional. The objective of this study was to determine the normal radiographic variation in leg length and hip...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noel Bien T. Carlos, MS, Nicholas P. Drain, MD, Venkata Kalyan Byrapogu, MS, Daniel Lippe, BS, Rachel Romano, BS, Sam Kuzmishin, Darini Rajesh, BS, Sophia Angele, BS, Kenneth L. Urish, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344123000560
_version_ 1797736864139968512
author Noel Bien T. Carlos, MS
Nicholas P. Drain, MD
Venkata Kalyan Byrapogu, MS
Daniel Lippe, BS
Rachel Romano, BS
Sam Kuzmishin
Darini Rajesh, BS
Sophia Angele, BS
Kenneth L. Urish, MD, PhD
author_facet Noel Bien T. Carlos, MS
Nicholas P. Drain, MD
Venkata Kalyan Byrapogu, MS
Daniel Lippe, BS
Rachel Romano, BS
Sam Kuzmishin
Darini Rajesh, BS
Sophia Angele, BS
Kenneth L. Urish, MD, PhD
author_sort Noel Bien T. Carlos, MS
collection DOAJ
description Background: Leg length and hip offset are important principles in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients may endorse leg length differences (LLD) postoperatively that may be anatomical or functional. The objective of this study was to determine the normal radiographic variation in leg length and hip offset in a preosteoarthritic population without a THA. Methods: A retrospective study was completed using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a prospective longitudinal study. Patients at risk of developing or with early osteoarthritis without inflammatory arthritis or prior THA were included. Measurements were made from full limb length anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs. Multiple linear regression models were employed to predict side-to-side differences in LLD, Δ femoral offset (FO), Δ abductor muscle length (AML), Δ abductor lever arm, and Δ AP pelvic offset. Results: The mean radiographic LLD was 4.6 mm, with 12 mm within 1 standard deviation. No significant differences were detected between LLD and sex, age, body mass index, or height. The median radiographic differences in FO, AML, abductor lever arm, and AP pelvic offset were 3.2 mm, 4.8 mm, 3.6 mm, and 3.3 mm, respectively. Height was predictive of Δ FO, while both height and age were predictive of Δ AML. Conclusions: Radiographic leg length variations in a population without symptomatic or radiographic osteoarthritis exist. FO and AML are dependent on patient characteristics. Preoperative radiographic LLD is not predicted by age, gender, body mass index, or height. It should be stressed that anatomic reconstruction is one of the many goals of arthroplasty and can stand in conflict with the priority and primary goals of stability and fixation, which should be prioritized.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:19:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e18909bc7b341f4b257f3f777be5426
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-3441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:19:11Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty Today
spelling doaj.art-1e18909bc7b341f4b257f3f777be54262023-08-26T04:43:31ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412023-08-0122101151An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing OsteoarthritisNoel Bien T. Carlos, MS0Nicholas P. Drain, MD1Venkata Kalyan Byrapogu, MS2Daniel Lippe, BS3Rachel Romano, BS4Sam Kuzmishin5Darini Rajesh, BS6Sophia Angele, BS7Kenneth L. Urish, MD, PhD8University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Arthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USAArthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USAUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Arthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USAArthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USAArthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USAArthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USAArthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USAArthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USAArthritis and Arthroplasty Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Corresponding author. Magee Bone and Joint Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1601B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Tel.: +1 412 641 8609.Background: Leg length and hip offset are important principles in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients may endorse leg length differences (LLD) postoperatively that may be anatomical or functional. The objective of this study was to determine the normal radiographic variation in leg length and hip offset in a preosteoarthritic population without a THA. Methods: A retrospective study was completed using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a prospective longitudinal study. Patients at risk of developing or with early osteoarthritis without inflammatory arthritis or prior THA were included. Measurements were made from full limb length anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs. Multiple linear regression models were employed to predict side-to-side differences in LLD, Δ femoral offset (FO), Δ abductor muscle length (AML), Δ abductor lever arm, and Δ AP pelvic offset. Results: The mean radiographic LLD was 4.6 mm, with 12 mm within 1 standard deviation. No significant differences were detected between LLD and sex, age, body mass index, or height. The median radiographic differences in FO, AML, abductor lever arm, and AP pelvic offset were 3.2 mm, 4.8 mm, 3.6 mm, and 3.3 mm, respectively. Height was predictive of Δ FO, while both height and age were predictive of Δ AML. Conclusions: Radiographic leg length variations in a population without symptomatic or radiographic osteoarthritis exist. FO and AML are dependent on patient characteristics. Preoperative radiographic LLD is not predicted by age, gender, body mass index, or height. It should be stressed that anatomic reconstruction is one of the many goals of arthroplasty and can stand in conflict with the priority and primary goals of stability and fixation, which should be prioritized.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344123000560Leg length discrepancyFemoral offsetTotal hip arthroplastyRadiographic variationOsteoarthritisHip biomechanics
spellingShingle Noel Bien T. Carlos, MS
Nicholas P. Drain, MD
Venkata Kalyan Byrapogu, MS
Daniel Lippe, BS
Rachel Romano, BS
Sam Kuzmishin
Darini Rajesh, BS
Sophia Angele, BS
Kenneth L. Urish, MD, PhD
An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis
Arthroplasty Today
Leg length discrepancy
Femoral offset
Total hip arthroplasty
Radiographic variation
Osteoarthritis
Hip biomechanics
title An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis
title_full An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis
title_fullStr An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis
title_short An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis
title_sort analysis of radiographic leg length discrepancy and hip offset in patients at risk of developing osteoarthritis
topic Leg length discrepancy
Femoral offset
Total hip arthroplasty
Radiographic variation
Osteoarthritis
Hip biomechanics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344123000560
work_keys_str_mv AT noelbientcarlosms ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT nicholaspdrainmd ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT venkatakalyanbyrapogums ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT daniellippebs ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT rachelromanobs ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT samkuzmishin ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT darinirajeshbs ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT sophiaangelebs ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT kennethlurishmdphd ananalysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT noelbientcarlosms analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT nicholaspdrainmd analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT venkatakalyanbyrapogums analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT daniellippebs analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT rachelromanobs analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT samkuzmishin analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT darinirajeshbs analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT sophiaangelebs analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis
AT kennethlurishmdphd analysisofradiographicleglengthdiscrepancyandhipoffsetinpatientsatriskofdevelopingosteoarthritis