Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level Approach

In continental countries, building materials are often moved over long distances from factories to building sites. This is especially important when quality and performance certification systems are required for the building materials’ acquisition. In this scenario, the transportation phase tends to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas R. Caldas, Francesco Pittau, Roberto Schaeffer, Anna K. E. B. Saraiva, Rayane de L. M. Paiva, Romildo D. Toledo Filho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:World
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/2/4/30
_version_ 1797499750971342848
author Lucas R. Caldas
Francesco Pittau
Roberto Schaeffer
Anna K. E. B. Saraiva
Rayane de L. M. Paiva
Romildo D. Toledo Filho
author_facet Lucas R. Caldas
Francesco Pittau
Roberto Schaeffer
Anna K. E. B. Saraiva
Rayane de L. M. Paiva
Romildo D. Toledo Filho
author_sort Lucas R. Caldas
collection DOAJ
description In continental countries, building materials are often moved over long distances from factories to building sites. This is especially important when quality and performance certification systems are required for the building materials’ acquisition. In this scenario, the transportation phase tends to have a great contribution to building materials’ environmental impacts. Taking into consideration that countries such as China, India, and Brazil, i.e., continental countries, are expecting the largest future housing demand, the issue of transportation will have a crucial role in environmental impacts. Through a Brazilian case study, the present work investigates the potential environmental impacts of structural masonry made of concrete and ceramic blocks certified by the Brazilian Quality Program. A cradle-to-site Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is carried out while considering a country-level approach using data from the literature and Ecoinvent. The results show that ceramic blocks are preferable for most states and scenarios. Human Health and Ecosystem Quality are the two categories most affected by transportation, and they can reach more than 96% and 99%, respectively. The efficiency of the building material transportation system plays an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A shift in building components from concrete to ceramic blocks has the potential to mitigate between 154 and 229 Mt CO2-eq between 2020 and 2050. The methodological approach used in this work can be applied to other building materials and other countries, especially those of continental dimensions that are expected to have a significant future housing demand.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:51:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e36a0b6af014ba38b8aae8a7700d559
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-4060
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:51:55Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series World
spelling doaj.art-1e36a0b6af014ba38b8aae8a7700d5592023-11-23T11:04:12ZengMDPI AGWorld2673-40602021-11-012448250410.3390/world2040030Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level ApproachLucas R. Caldas0Francesco Pittau1Roberto Schaeffer2Anna K. E. B. Saraiva3Rayane de L. M. Paiva4Romildo D. Toledo Filho5Civil Engineering Program (PEC), COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, BrazilDepartment of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (ABC), Politecnico di Milano, Via G. Ponzio 31, 20133 Milan, ItalyCentre for Energy and Environmental Economics (CENERGIA), Energy Planning Programme (PPE), COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, BrazilCivil Engineering Program (PEC), COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, BrazilCivil Engineering Program (PEC), COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, BrazilCivil Engineering Program (PEC), COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, BrazilIn continental countries, building materials are often moved over long distances from factories to building sites. This is especially important when quality and performance certification systems are required for the building materials’ acquisition. In this scenario, the transportation phase tends to have a great contribution to building materials’ environmental impacts. Taking into consideration that countries such as China, India, and Brazil, i.e., continental countries, are expecting the largest future housing demand, the issue of transportation will have a crucial role in environmental impacts. Through a Brazilian case study, the present work investigates the potential environmental impacts of structural masonry made of concrete and ceramic blocks certified by the Brazilian Quality Program. A cradle-to-site Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is carried out while considering a country-level approach using data from the literature and Ecoinvent. The results show that ceramic blocks are preferable for most states and scenarios. Human Health and Ecosystem Quality are the two categories most affected by transportation, and they can reach more than 96% and 99%, respectively. The efficiency of the building material transportation system plays an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A shift in building components from concrete to ceramic blocks has the potential to mitigate between 154 and 229 Mt CO2-eq between 2020 and 2050. The methodological approach used in this work can be applied to other building materials and other countries, especially those of continental dimensions that are expected to have a significant future housing demand.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/2/4/30LCAbuilding materialstransportationconstructionstructural masonryhousing deficit
spellingShingle Lucas R. Caldas
Francesco Pittau
Roberto Schaeffer
Anna K. E. B. Saraiva
Rayane de L. M. Paiva
Romildo D. Toledo Filho
Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level Approach
World
LCA
building materials
transportation
construction
structural masonry
housing deficit
title Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level Approach
title_full Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level Approach
title_fullStr Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level Approach
title_full_unstemmed Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level Approach
title_short Concrete vs. Ceramic Blocks: Environmental Impact Evaluation Considering a Country-Level Approach
title_sort concrete vs ceramic blocks environmental impact evaluation considering a country level approach
topic LCA
building materials
transportation
construction
structural masonry
housing deficit
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/2/4/30
work_keys_str_mv AT lucasrcaldas concretevsceramicblocksenvironmentalimpactevaluationconsideringacountrylevelapproach
AT francescopittau concretevsceramicblocksenvironmentalimpactevaluationconsideringacountrylevelapproach
AT robertoschaeffer concretevsceramicblocksenvironmentalimpactevaluationconsideringacountrylevelapproach
AT annakebsaraiva concretevsceramicblocksenvironmentalimpactevaluationconsideringacountrylevelapproach
AT rayanedelmpaiva concretevsceramicblocksenvironmentalimpactevaluationconsideringacountrylevelapproach
AT romildodtoledofilho concretevsceramicblocksenvironmentalimpactevaluationconsideringacountrylevelapproach