Validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene Pe-Lite liner
Abstract The Biosculptor's CNC milling machine, the Biomill, offered four different surfaces machined on positive models. This study aims to adopt the surface topography method in characterizing the four different surface roughness of polyethylene Pe-Lite liner as a product of the Biomill. Thre...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-02-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05173-3 |
| _version_ | 1819277689461145600 |
|---|---|
| author | Nur Afiqah Hamzah Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak Mohd Sayuti Ab Karim Siti Zuliana Salleh |
| author_facet | Nur Afiqah Hamzah Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak Mohd Sayuti Ab Karim Siti Zuliana Salleh |
| author_sort | Nur Afiqah Hamzah |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The Biosculptor's CNC milling machine, the Biomill, offered four different surfaces machined on positive models. This study aims to adopt the surface topography method in characterizing the four different surface roughness of polyethylene Pe-Lite liner as a product of the Biomill. Three surface parameters chosen were the arithmetic average (Ra), root mean square roughness (Rq), and ten-point height (Rz). The surface parameters were used to define the four different surfaces (STANDARD, FINE, COARSE, and FAST) and then compared with the same liner material from a conventionally fabricated socket. The Ra values of the conventional liner, 8.43 μm, were determined to be in-between the Ra values of STANDARD and FAST surfaces which were 8.33 μm and 8.58 μm respectively. STANDARD surface required 43.2 min to be carved while FAST surface took almost only a third of the time compared to STANDARD surface (conventional socket takes 2–3 days). The results of this study would be one of the guidelines to the prosthetists using the Biosculptor in socket fabrication to produce sockets according to the suitable surface to cater to different requirements and levels of activity of each amputee. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-24T00:00:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1e3ceb8c5bea46f6a99255dcfce01773 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-24T00:00:06Z |
| publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-1e3ceb8c5bea46f6a99255dcfce017732022-12-21T17:25:09ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-02-011211910.1038/s41598-022-05173-3Validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene Pe-Lite linerNur Afiqah Hamzah0Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak1Mohd Sayuti Ab Karim2Siti Zuliana Salleh3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti MalayaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti MalayaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti MalayaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti MalayaAbstract The Biosculptor's CNC milling machine, the Biomill, offered four different surfaces machined on positive models. This study aims to adopt the surface topography method in characterizing the four different surface roughness of polyethylene Pe-Lite liner as a product of the Biomill. Three surface parameters chosen were the arithmetic average (Ra), root mean square roughness (Rq), and ten-point height (Rz). The surface parameters were used to define the four different surfaces (STANDARD, FINE, COARSE, and FAST) and then compared with the same liner material from a conventionally fabricated socket. The Ra values of the conventional liner, 8.43 μm, were determined to be in-between the Ra values of STANDARD and FAST surfaces which were 8.33 μm and 8.58 μm respectively. STANDARD surface required 43.2 min to be carved while FAST surface took almost only a third of the time compared to STANDARD surface (conventional socket takes 2–3 days). The results of this study would be one of the guidelines to the prosthetists using the Biosculptor in socket fabrication to produce sockets according to the suitable surface to cater to different requirements and levels of activity of each amputee.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05173-3 |
| spellingShingle | Nur Afiqah Hamzah Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak Mohd Sayuti Ab Karim Siti Zuliana Salleh Validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene Pe-Lite liner Scientific Reports |
| title | Validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene Pe-Lite liner |
| title_full | Validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene Pe-Lite liner |
| title_fullStr | Validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene Pe-Lite liner |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene Pe-Lite liner |
| title_short | Validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene Pe-Lite liner |
| title_sort | validation of a roughness parameters for defining surface roughness of prosthetic polyethylene pe lite liner |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05173-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nurafiqahhamzah validationofaroughnessparametersfordefiningsurfaceroughnessofprostheticpolyethylenepeliteliner AT nasrulanuarabdrazak validationofaroughnessparametersfordefiningsurfaceroughnessofprostheticpolyethylenepeliteliner AT mohdsayutiabkarim validationofaroughnessparametersfordefiningsurfaceroughnessofprostheticpolyethylenepeliteliner AT sitizulianasalleh validationofaroughnessparametersfordefiningsurfaceroughnessofprostheticpolyethylenepeliteliner |