The utility of a latent-cause framework for understanding addiction phenomena

Computational models of addiction often rely on a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) formulation, owing to the close associations between model-free RL, habitual behavior and the dopaminergic system. However, such formulations typically do not capture key recurrent features of addiction phenomen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sashank Pisupati, Angela J. Langdon, Anna B. Konova, Yael Niv
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:Addiction Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772392524000026
_version_ 1797342083555524608
author Sashank Pisupati
Angela J. Langdon
Anna B. Konova
Yael Niv
author_facet Sashank Pisupati
Angela J. Langdon
Anna B. Konova
Yael Niv
author_sort Sashank Pisupati
collection DOAJ
description Computational models of addiction often rely on a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) formulation, owing to the close associations between model-free RL, habitual behavior and the dopaminergic system. However, such formulations typically do not capture key recurrent features of addiction phenomena such as craving and relapse. Moreover, they cannot account for goal-directed aspects of addiction that necessitate contrasting, model-based formulations. Here we synthesize a growing body of evidence and propose that a latent-cause framework can help unify our understanding of several recurrent phenomena in addiction, by viewing them as the inferred return of previous, persistent “latent causes”. We demonstrate that applying this framework to Pavlovian and instrumental settings can help account for defining features of craving and relapse such as outcome-specificity, generalization, and cyclical dynamics. Finally, we argue that this framework can bridge model-free and model-based formulations, and account for individual variability in phenomenology by accommodating the memories, beliefs, and goals of those living with addiction, motivating a centering of the individual, subjective experience of addiction and recovery.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T10:28:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e3d4a565a4c4126ad68778653c0e82d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-3925
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T10:28:16Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Addiction Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-1e3d4a565a4c4126ad68778653c0e82d2024-01-27T07:00:41ZengElsevierAddiction Neuroscience2772-39252024-03-0110100143The utility of a latent-cause framework for understanding addiction phenomenaSashank Pisupati0Angela J. Langdon1Anna B. Konova2Yael Niv3Limbic Limited, London UK; Princeton Neuroscience Institute & Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton NJ, USANational Institute of Mental Health & National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, USADepartment of Psychiatry, University Behavioral Health Care & Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ, USACorresponding author.; Princeton Neuroscience Institute & Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton NJ, USAComputational models of addiction often rely on a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) formulation, owing to the close associations between model-free RL, habitual behavior and the dopaminergic system. However, such formulations typically do not capture key recurrent features of addiction phenomena such as craving and relapse. Moreover, they cannot account for goal-directed aspects of addiction that necessitate contrasting, model-based formulations. Here we synthesize a growing body of evidence and propose that a latent-cause framework can help unify our understanding of several recurrent phenomena in addiction, by viewing them as the inferred return of previous, persistent “latent causes”. We demonstrate that applying this framework to Pavlovian and instrumental settings can help account for defining features of craving and relapse such as outcome-specificity, generalization, and cyclical dynamics. Finally, we argue that this framework can bridge model-free and model-based formulations, and account for individual variability in phenomenology by accommodating the memories, beliefs, and goals of those living with addiction, motivating a centering of the individual, subjective experience of addiction and recovery.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772392524000026Latent-cause inferenceAddictionCravingRelapse
spellingShingle Sashank Pisupati
Angela J. Langdon
Anna B. Konova
Yael Niv
The utility of a latent-cause framework for understanding addiction phenomena
Addiction Neuroscience
Latent-cause inference
Addiction
Craving
Relapse
title The utility of a latent-cause framework for understanding addiction phenomena
title_full The utility of a latent-cause framework for understanding addiction phenomena
title_fullStr The utility of a latent-cause framework for understanding addiction phenomena
title_full_unstemmed The utility of a latent-cause framework for understanding addiction phenomena
title_short The utility of a latent-cause framework for understanding addiction phenomena
title_sort utility of a latent cause framework for understanding addiction phenomena
topic Latent-cause inference
Addiction
Craving
Relapse
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772392524000026
work_keys_str_mv AT sashankpisupati theutilityofalatentcauseframeworkforunderstandingaddictionphenomena
AT angelajlangdon theutilityofalatentcauseframeworkforunderstandingaddictionphenomena
AT annabkonova theutilityofalatentcauseframeworkforunderstandingaddictionphenomena
AT yaelniv theutilityofalatentcauseframeworkforunderstandingaddictionphenomena
AT sashankpisupati utilityofalatentcauseframeworkforunderstandingaddictionphenomena
AT angelajlangdon utilityofalatentcauseframeworkforunderstandingaddictionphenomena
AT annabkonova utilityofalatentcauseframeworkforunderstandingaddictionphenomena
AT yaelniv utilityofalatentcauseframeworkforunderstandingaddictionphenomena