Impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquaculture

Abstract Freshwater aquaculture can have negative impacts on chemical, physical and biological water quality. To contextualise the impact that these activities may have, a case study site in Ireland was monitored for 1 year. The study aims were to investigate the impact of freshwater aquaculture on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronan Cooney, Alexandre Tahar, Alan Kennedy, Eoghan Clifford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-02-01
Series:Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.142
_version_ 1797294185315827712
author Ronan Cooney
Alexandre Tahar
Alan Kennedy
Eoghan Clifford
author_facet Ronan Cooney
Alexandre Tahar
Alan Kennedy
Eoghan Clifford
author_sort Ronan Cooney
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Freshwater aquaculture can have negative impacts on chemical, physical and biological water quality. To contextualise the impact that these activities may have, a case study site in Ireland was monitored for 1 year. The study aims were to investigate the impact of freshwater aquaculture on water quality (biological, physical, and chemical) and the degree of the impact and recovery in water quality, within 1000 m downstream of a salmon smolt hatchery. The hatchery was monitored, at four locations (upstream, 10, 100, and 1,000 m downstream of the discharge point). Data on macroinvertebrate, macrophyte, hydromorphology and chemical characteristics were collected. Results for the physical monitoring indicated no significant changes in hydromorphology between up and downstream sites. Chemical water quality did decrease downstream in terms of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). The greatest concentrations in N and P were found at 1000 m though it is likely additional contributions from agriculture impacted this site. Dissolved oxygen was steady throughout the monitoring campaign with a 13% variance between upstream and downstream locations. Changes in biological indices were statistically significant for taxa at all downstream sites. There were positive trends which indicated a degree of recovery in biotic indices.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T21:26:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e57e7a02c0b4831a4c855eaceec8f08
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2693-8847
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T21:26:36Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries
spelling doaj.art-1e57e7a02c0b4831a4c855eaceec8f082024-02-27T04:35:20ZengWileyAquaculture, Fish and Fisheries2693-88472024-02-0141n/an/a10.1002/aff2.142Impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquacultureRonan Cooney0Alexandre Tahar1Alan Kennedy2Eoghan Clifford3School of Engineering University of Galway Galway IrelandSchool of Engineering University of Galway Galway IrelandSchool of Engineering University of Galway Galway IrelandSchool of Engineering University of Galway Galway IrelandAbstract Freshwater aquaculture can have negative impacts on chemical, physical and biological water quality. To contextualise the impact that these activities may have, a case study site in Ireland was monitored for 1 year. The study aims were to investigate the impact of freshwater aquaculture on water quality (biological, physical, and chemical) and the degree of the impact and recovery in water quality, within 1000 m downstream of a salmon smolt hatchery. The hatchery was monitored, at four locations (upstream, 10, 100, and 1,000 m downstream of the discharge point). Data on macroinvertebrate, macrophyte, hydromorphology and chemical characteristics were collected. Results for the physical monitoring indicated no significant changes in hydromorphology between up and downstream sites. Chemical water quality did decrease downstream in terms of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). The greatest concentrations in N and P were found at 1000 m though it is likely additional contributions from agriculture impacted this site. Dissolved oxygen was steady throughout the monitoring campaign with a 13% variance between upstream and downstream locations. Changes in biological indices were statistically significant for taxa at all downstream sites. There were positive trends which indicated a degree of recovery in biotic indices.https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.142aquacultureAtlantic salmonfreshwaterrecoverywater quality
spellingShingle Ronan Cooney
Alexandre Tahar
Alan Kennedy
Eoghan Clifford
Impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquaculture
Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries
aquaculture
Atlantic salmon
freshwater
recovery
water quality
title Impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquaculture
title_full Impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquaculture
title_fullStr Impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquaculture
title_full_unstemmed Impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquaculture
title_short Impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquaculture
title_sort impact and recovery of water quality in a river with salmon aquaculture
topic aquaculture
Atlantic salmon
freshwater
recovery
water quality
url https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.142
work_keys_str_mv AT ronancooney impactandrecoveryofwaterqualityinariverwithsalmonaquaculture
AT alexandretahar impactandrecoveryofwaterqualityinariverwithsalmonaquaculture
AT alankennedy impactandrecoveryofwaterqualityinariverwithsalmonaquaculture
AT eoghanclifford impactandrecoveryofwaterqualityinariverwithsalmonaquaculture