Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from Utilising Pig Manure and Grass for Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion in the UK, EU, and China

Pig manure currently results in sizeable greenhouse gas emissions, during storage and spreading to land. Anaerobic digestion and hydrothermal carbonisation could provide significant greenhouse gas mitigation, as well as generate renewable heat and power (with anaerobic digestion), or a peat-like soi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas Davison, Aaron Brown, Andrew Ross
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/479
_version_ 1827759192132288512
author Nicholas Davison
Aaron Brown
Andrew Ross
author_facet Nicholas Davison
Aaron Brown
Andrew Ross
author_sort Nicholas Davison
collection DOAJ
description Pig manure currently results in sizeable greenhouse gas emissions, during storage and spreading to land. Anaerobic digestion and hydrothermal carbonisation could provide significant greenhouse gas mitigation, as well as generate renewable heat and power (with anaerobic digestion), or a peat-like soil amendment product (with hydrothermal carbonisation). The greenhouse gas mitigation potential associated with avoidance of pig manure storage and spreading in the UK, EU, and China, as well as the potential to provide heat and power by anaerobic digestion and soil amendment products by hydrothermal carbonisation was herein determined. In each case, the mono-conversion of pig manure is compared to co-conversion with a 50:50 mixture of pig manure with grass. Anaerobic digestion displayed a greater greenhouse gas mitigation potential than hydrothermal carbonisation in all cases, and co-processing with grass greatly enhances greenhouse gas mitigation potential. China has the largest greenhouse gas mitigation potential (129 MT CO<sub>2</sub> eq), and greatest mitigation per kg of pig manure (1.8 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/kg pig manure volatile solids). The energy grid carbon intensity has a significant impact on the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the different approaches in the different regions. Pig manure is generated in large amounts in China, and the energy generated from biogas offsets a higher carbon intensity grid. Greenhouse gas savings from the anaerobic digestion of pig manure and grass have been calculated to provide a significant potential for reducing total greenhouse gas emissions representation in China (1.05%), the EU (0.92%), and the UK (0.19%). Overall, the utilisation of pig manure could bring about substantial greenhouse savings, especially through co-digestion of pig manure with grass in countries with large pig farming industries and carbon intense energy mixes.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:17:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e62a0adf7df47479de0bf288bf153d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0472
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:17:37Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-1e62a0adf7df47479de0bf288bf153d32023-11-16T18:31:47ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722023-02-0113247910.3390/agriculture13020479Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from Utilising Pig Manure and Grass for Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion in the UK, EU, and ChinaNicholas Davison0Aaron Brown1Andrew Ross2School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKPig manure currently results in sizeable greenhouse gas emissions, during storage and spreading to land. Anaerobic digestion and hydrothermal carbonisation could provide significant greenhouse gas mitigation, as well as generate renewable heat and power (with anaerobic digestion), or a peat-like soil amendment product (with hydrothermal carbonisation). The greenhouse gas mitigation potential associated with avoidance of pig manure storage and spreading in the UK, EU, and China, as well as the potential to provide heat and power by anaerobic digestion and soil amendment products by hydrothermal carbonisation was herein determined. In each case, the mono-conversion of pig manure is compared to co-conversion with a 50:50 mixture of pig manure with grass. Anaerobic digestion displayed a greater greenhouse gas mitigation potential than hydrothermal carbonisation in all cases, and co-processing with grass greatly enhances greenhouse gas mitigation potential. China has the largest greenhouse gas mitigation potential (129 MT CO<sub>2</sub> eq), and greatest mitigation per kg of pig manure (1.8 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/kg pig manure volatile solids). The energy grid carbon intensity has a significant impact on the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the different approaches in the different regions. Pig manure is generated in large amounts in China, and the energy generated from biogas offsets a higher carbon intensity grid. Greenhouse gas savings from the anaerobic digestion of pig manure and grass have been calculated to provide a significant potential for reducing total greenhouse gas emissions representation in China (1.05%), the EU (0.92%), and the UK (0.19%). Overall, the utilisation of pig manure could bring about substantial greenhouse savings, especially through co-digestion of pig manure with grass in countries with large pig farming industries and carbon intense energy mixes.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/479hydrothermal carbonisationanaerobic digestionpig manuregrasspeat substitutionGHG mitigation
spellingShingle Nicholas Davison
Aaron Brown
Andrew Ross
Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from Utilising Pig Manure and Grass for Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion in the UK, EU, and China
Agriculture
hydrothermal carbonisation
anaerobic digestion
pig manure
grass
peat substitution
GHG mitigation
title Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from Utilising Pig Manure and Grass for Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion in the UK, EU, and China
title_full Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from Utilising Pig Manure and Grass for Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion in the UK, EU, and China
title_fullStr Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from Utilising Pig Manure and Grass for Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion in the UK, EU, and China
title_full_unstemmed Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from Utilising Pig Manure and Grass for Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion in the UK, EU, and China
title_short Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from Utilising Pig Manure and Grass for Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion in the UK, EU, and China
title_sort potential greenhouse gas mitigation from utilising pig manure and grass for hydrothermal carbonisation and anaerobic digestion in the uk eu and china
topic hydrothermal carbonisation
anaerobic digestion
pig manure
grass
peat substitution
GHG mitigation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/479
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasdavison potentialgreenhousegasmitigationfromutilisingpigmanureandgrassforhydrothermalcarbonisationandanaerobicdigestionintheukeuandchina
AT aaronbrown potentialgreenhousegasmitigationfromutilisingpigmanureandgrassforhydrothermalcarbonisationandanaerobicdigestionintheukeuandchina
AT andrewross potentialgreenhousegasmitigationfromutilisingpigmanureandgrassforhydrothermalcarbonisationandanaerobicdigestionintheukeuandchina