Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.

According to life history theory, natural selection has shaped trade-offs for allocating energy among growth, reproduction and maintenance to maximize individual fitness. In social mammals body size and dominance rank are two key variables believed to influence female reproductive success. However,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edward Wright, Jordi Galbany, Shannon C McFarlin, Eric Ndayishimiye, Tara S Stoinski, Martha M Robbins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233235
_version_ 1818362057588736000
author Edward Wright
Jordi Galbany
Shannon C McFarlin
Eric Ndayishimiye
Tara S Stoinski
Martha M Robbins
author_facet Edward Wright
Jordi Galbany
Shannon C McFarlin
Eric Ndayishimiye
Tara S Stoinski
Martha M Robbins
author_sort Edward Wright
collection DOAJ
description According to life history theory, natural selection has shaped trade-offs for allocating energy among growth, reproduction and maintenance to maximize individual fitness. In social mammals body size and dominance rank are two key variables believed to influence female reproductive success. However, few studies have examined these variables together, particularly in long-lived species. Previous studies found that female dominance rank correlates with reproductive success in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei), which is surprising given they have weak dominance relationships and experience seemingly low levels of feeding competition. It is not currently known whether this relationship is primarily driven by a positive correlation between rank and body size. We used the non-invasive parallel laser method to measure two body size variables (back breadth and body length) of 34 wild adult female mountain gorillas, together with long-term dominance and demography data to investigate the interrelationships among body size, dominance rank and two measures of female reproductive success (inter-birth interval N = 29 and infant mortality N = 64). Using linear mixed models, we found no support for body size to be significantly correlated with dominance rank or female reproductive success. Higher-ranking females had significantly shorter inter-birth intervals than lower-ranking ones, but dominance rank was not significantly correlated with infant mortality. Our results suggest that female dominance rank is primarily determined by factors other than linear body dimensions and that high rank provides benefits even in species with weak dominance relationships and abundant year-round food resources. Future studies should focus on the mechanisms behind heterogeneity in female body size in relation to trade-offs in allocating energy to growth, maintenance and lifetime reproductive success.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T21:26:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e6eb32bfb89405cb156fefdd4e6ed6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T21:26:32Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-1e6eb32bfb89405cb156fefdd4e6ed6f2022-12-21T23:30:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023323510.1371/journal.pone.0233235Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.Edward WrightJordi GalbanyShannon C McFarlinEric NdayishimiyeTara S StoinskiMartha M RobbinsAccording to life history theory, natural selection has shaped trade-offs for allocating energy among growth, reproduction and maintenance to maximize individual fitness. In social mammals body size and dominance rank are two key variables believed to influence female reproductive success. However, few studies have examined these variables together, particularly in long-lived species. Previous studies found that female dominance rank correlates with reproductive success in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei), which is surprising given they have weak dominance relationships and experience seemingly low levels of feeding competition. It is not currently known whether this relationship is primarily driven by a positive correlation between rank and body size. We used the non-invasive parallel laser method to measure two body size variables (back breadth and body length) of 34 wild adult female mountain gorillas, together with long-term dominance and demography data to investigate the interrelationships among body size, dominance rank and two measures of female reproductive success (inter-birth interval N = 29 and infant mortality N = 64). Using linear mixed models, we found no support for body size to be significantly correlated with dominance rank or female reproductive success. Higher-ranking females had significantly shorter inter-birth intervals than lower-ranking ones, but dominance rank was not significantly correlated with infant mortality. Our results suggest that female dominance rank is primarily determined by factors other than linear body dimensions and that high rank provides benefits even in species with weak dominance relationships and abundant year-round food resources. Future studies should focus on the mechanisms behind heterogeneity in female body size in relation to trade-offs in allocating energy to growth, maintenance and lifetime reproductive success.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233235
spellingShingle Edward Wright
Jordi Galbany
Shannon C McFarlin
Eric Ndayishimiye
Tara S Stoinski
Martha M Robbins
Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.
PLoS ONE
title Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.
title_full Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.
title_fullStr Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.
title_full_unstemmed Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.
title_short Dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas.
title_sort dominance rank but not body size influences female reproductive success in mountain gorillas
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233235
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardwright dominancerankbutnotbodysizeinfluencesfemalereproductivesuccessinmountaingorillas
AT jordigalbany dominancerankbutnotbodysizeinfluencesfemalereproductivesuccessinmountaingorillas
AT shannoncmcfarlin dominancerankbutnotbodysizeinfluencesfemalereproductivesuccessinmountaingorillas
AT ericndayishimiye dominancerankbutnotbodysizeinfluencesfemalereproductivesuccessinmountaingorillas
AT tarasstoinski dominancerankbutnotbodysizeinfluencesfemalereproductivesuccessinmountaingorillas
AT marthamrobbins dominancerankbutnotbodysizeinfluencesfemalereproductivesuccessinmountaingorillas