Who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room? Management plans for free-roaming elephant in South Africa

In 2008, South Africa adopted its ‘National Norms and Standards for the Management of Elephants in South Africa’. Concern has subsequently been raised as to whether these norms and standards apply to free-ranging elephant on land, which had not been enclosed with a fence with the express purpose of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew C. Blackmore, Arie Trouwborst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: South African National Biodiversity Institut 2018-06-01
Series:Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://abcjournal.org/index.php/abc/article/view/2271
_version_ 1818199037966286848
author Andrew C. Blackmore
Arie Trouwborst
author_facet Andrew C. Blackmore
Arie Trouwborst
author_sort Andrew C. Blackmore
collection DOAJ
description In 2008, South Africa adopted its ‘National Norms and Standards for the Management of Elephants in South Africa’. Concern has subsequently been raised as to whether these norms and standards apply to free-ranging elephant on land, which had not been enclosed with a fence with the express purpose of containing these animals and other game on the property. The application of these norms and standards pivots on whether the owner(s) of the property have taken possession of these animals in accordance with common law applicable to game, or have given effect to the provisions of the Game Theft Act. To address this concern, this article briefly explores the evolution of South African regulatory jurisprudence applicable to game, including elephant, and analyses the norms and standards in relation to international and national legislation and common law applying to elephants. The norms and standards are not applicable to unowned, free-roaming elephant. These norms and standards, therefore, do not fulfil their primary objective of uniform management of elephant across South Africa. This limitation of the norms and standards, therefore, needs to be considered when they are revised.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T02:15:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e77b4b5c5e24a7c903f074d6736240c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0006-8241
2311-9284
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T02:15:24Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher South African National Biodiversity Institut
record_format Article
series Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation
spelling doaj.art-1e77b4b5c5e24a7c903f074d6736240c2022-12-22T00:41:48ZengSouth African National Biodiversity InstitutBothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation0006-82412311-92842018-06-01482e1e610.4102/abc.v48i2.22711934Who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room? Management plans for free-roaming elephant in South AfricaAndrew C. Blackmore0Arie Trouwborst1Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa; School of Law, University of KwaZulu-NatalDepartment of European and International Public Law, Tilburg University, theIn 2008, South Africa adopted its ‘National Norms and Standards for the Management of Elephants in South Africa’. Concern has subsequently been raised as to whether these norms and standards apply to free-ranging elephant on land, which had not been enclosed with a fence with the express purpose of containing these animals and other game on the property. The application of these norms and standards pivots on whether the owner(s) of the property have taken possession of these animals in accordance with common law applicable to game, or have given effect to the provisions of the Game Theft Act. To address this concern, this article briefly explores the evolution of South African regulatory jurisprudence applicable to game, including elephant, and analyses the norms and standards in relation to international and national legislation and common law applying to elephants. The norms and standards are not applicable to unowned, free-roaming elephant. These norms and standards, therefore, do not fulfil their primary objective of uniform management of elephant across South Africa. This limitation of the norms and standards, therefore, needs to be considered when they are revised.https://abcjournal.org/index.php/abc/article/view/2271ElephantGameCommon LawManagement PlansMultilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAS)Norms and standardsOwnershipPublic Trust DoctrineRes nulliusWildlife
spellingShingle Andrew C. Blackmore
Arie Trouwborst
Who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room? Management plans for free-roaming elephant in South Africa
Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation
Elephant
Game
Common Law
Management Plans
Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAS)
Norms and standards
Ownership
Public Trust Doctrine
Res nullius
Wildlife
title Who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room? Management plans for free-roaming elephant in South Africa
title_full Who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room? Management plans for free-roaming elephant in South Africa
title_fullStr Who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room? Management plans for free-roaming elephant in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room? Management plans for free-roaming elephant in South Africa
title_short Who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room? Management plans for free-roaming elephant in South Africa
title_sort who owns and is responsible for the elephant in the room management plans for free roaming elephant in south africa
topic Elephant
Game
Common Law
Management Plans
Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAS)
Norms and standards
Ownership
Public Trust Doctrine
Res nullius
Wildlife
url https://abcjournal.org/index.php/abc/article/view/2271
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewcblackmore whoownsandisresponsiblefortheelephantintheroommanagementplansforfreeroamingelephantinsouthafrica
AT arietrouwborst whoownsandisresponsiblefortheelephantintheroommanagementplansforfreeroamingelephantinsouthafrica