Healthcare quality management in Switzerland – a survey among providers

BACKGROUND: In the last decade assessing the quality of healthcare has become increasingly important across the world. Switzerland lacks a detailed overview of how quality management is implemented and of its effects on medical procedures and patients’ concerns. This study aimed to examine th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reto Kaderli, Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller, Adrian P. Businger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2012-04-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1474
_version_ 1798003533946028032
author Reto Kaderli
Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller
Adrian P. Businger
author_facet Reto Kaderli
Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller
Adrian P. Businger
author_sort Reto Kaderli
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: In the last decade assessing the quality of healthcare has become increasingly important across the world. Switzerland lacks a detailed overview of how quality management is implemented and of its effects on medical procedures and patients’ concerns. This study aimed to examine the systematics of quality management in Switzerland by assessing the providers and collected parameters of current quality initiatives. METHODS: In summer 2011 we contacted all of the medical societies in Switzerland, the Federal Office of Public Health, the Swiss Medical Association (FMH) and the head of Swiss medical insurance providers, to obtain detailed information on current quality initiatives. All quality initiatives featuring standardised parameter assessment were included. RESULTS: Of the current 45 initiatives, 19 were powered by medical societies, five by hospitals, 11 by non-medical societies, two by the government, two by insurance companies or related institutions and six by unspecified institutions. In all, 24 medical registers, five seals of quality, five circles of quality, two self-assessment tools, seven superior entities, one checklist and one combined project existed. The cost of treatment was evaluated by four initiatives. A data report was released by 24 quality initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: The wide variety and the large number of 45 recorded quality initiatives provides a promising basis for effective healthcare quality management in Switzerland. However, an independent national supervisory authority should be appointed to provide an effective review of all quality initiatives and their transparency and coordination.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:10:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e809b2fde134b4ca58d53ce303d581f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:10:24Z
publishDate 2012-04-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-1e809b2fde134b4ca58d53ce303d581f2022-12-22T04:24:38ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972012-04-01142171810.4414/smw.2012.13561Healthcare quality management in Switzerland – a survey among providersReto KaderliCarmen Andrea PfortmuellerAdrian P. Businger BACKGROUND: In the last decade assessing the quality of healthcare has become increasingly important across the world. Switzerland lacks a detailed overview of how quality management is implemented and of its effects on medical procedures and patients’ concerns. This study aimed to examine the systematics of quality management in Switzerland by assessing the providers and collected parameters of current quality initiatives. METHODS: In summer 2011 we contacted all of the medical societies in Switzerland, the Federal Office of Public Health, the Swiss Medical Association (FMH) and the head of Swiss medical insurance providers, to obtain detailed information on current quality initiatives. All quality initiatives featuring standardised parameter assessment were included. RESULTS: Of the current 45 initiatives, 19 were powered by medical societies, five by hospitals, 11 by non-medical societies, two by the government, two by insurance companies or related institutions and six by unspecified institutions. In all, 24 medical registers, five seals of quality, five circles of quality, two self-assessment tools, seven superior entities, one checklist and one combined project existed. The cost of treatment was evaluated by four initiatives. A data report was released by 24 quality initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: The wide variety and the large number of 45 recorded quality initiatives provides a promising basis for effective healthcare quality management in Switzerland. However, an independent national supervisory authority should be appointed to provide an effective review of all quality initiatives and their transparency and coordination. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1474healthcarepatient safetyquality managementSwitzerland
spellingShingle Reto Kaderli
Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller
Adrian P. Businger
Healthcare quality management in Switzerland – a survey among providers
Swiss Medical Weekly
healthcare
patient safety
quality management
Switzerland
title Healthcare quality management in Switzerland – a survey among providers
title_full Healthcare quality management in Switzerland – a survey among providers
title_fullStr Healthcare quality management in Switzerland – a survey among providers
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare quality management in Switzerland – a survey among providers
title_short Healthcare quality management in Switzerland – a survey among providers
title_sort healthcare quality management in switzerland a survey among providers
topic healthcare
patient safety
quality management
Switzerland
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1474
work_keys_str_mv AT retokaderli healthcarequalitymanagementinswitzerlandasurveyamongproviders
AT carmenandreapfortmueller healthcarequalitymanagementinswitzerlandasurveyamongproviders
AT adrianpbusinger healthcarequalitymanagementinswitzerlandasurveyamongproviders