Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review
Objectives There has been a rapid shift from face-to-face to remote consultation across healthcare settings. 90% of patients with mental health conditions are cared for entirely in primary care. Remote consultation can present challenges and benefits for patients with mental health conditions. The a...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Digital Health |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241233969 |
| _version_ | 1797267994157514752 |
|---|---|
| author | Serena Antonio David Joseph Joanne Parsons Helen Atherton |
| author_facet | Serena Antonio David Joseph Joanne Parsons Helen Atherton |
| author_sort | Serena Antonio |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives There has been a rapid shift from face-to-face to remote consultation across healthcare settings. 90% of patients with mental health conditions are cared for entirely in primary care. Remote consultation can present challenges and benefits for patients with mental health conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to collate and examine the evidence relating to remote consultation in UK primary care on the experiences of patients with mental health conditions. Methods Six major databases were searched for empirical studies published in the English language between 1 January 2010 and 21 October 2022. Studies were included where remote consultation occurred between a patient and primary care clinician. Outcomes of interest include mode of remote consultation, patient experiences and characteristics. Final included studies were assessed for quality, and results analysed with narrative synthesis. Results Six studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a range of mental health conditions and remote consultation modalities (telephone, video, online, email, text-based). Patients were overall satisfied with remote consultation, with particular benefit for certain mental health conditions or anxious patients. However, several studies found that face-to-face was the preferred method, with highlighted negatives to remote consultation, such as inflexibility of online formats. Acceptability of remote consultation is context specific and influenced by the purpose of the consultation and individual patient. Remote consultation may reduce anxiety in some patients, but is potentially less acceptable than face-to-face for relational appointments. Conclusions Acceptability of remote consultation is context dependent. There is a lack of evidence surrounding patient characteristics and access to remote consultation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-25T01:25:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1e81949cf49742f5984aae52653709c2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2055-2076 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-25T01:25:25Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Digital Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-1e81949cf49742f5984aae52653709c22024-03-08T21:05:11ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762024-03-011010.1177/20552076241233969Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic reviewSerena AntonioDavid JosephJoanne ParsonsHelen AthertonObjectives There has been a rapid shift from face-to-face to remote consultation across healthcare settings. 90% of patients with mental health conditions are cared for entirely in primary care. Remote consultation can present challenges and benefits for patients with mental health conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to collate and examine the evidence relating to remote consultation in UK primary care on the experiences of patients with mental health conditions. Methods Six major databases were searched for empirical studies published in the English language between 1 January 2010 and 21 October 2022. Studies were included where remote consultation occurred between a patient and primary care clinician. Outcomes of interest include mode of remote consultation, patient experiences and characteristics. Final included studies were assessed for quality, and results analysed with narrative synthesis. Results Six studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a range of mental health conditions and remote consultation modalities (telephone, video, online, email, text-based). Patients were overall satisfied with remote consultation, with particular benefit for certain mental health conditions or anxious patients. However, several studies found that face-to-face was the preferred method, with highlighted negatives to remote consultation, such as inflexibility of online formats. Acceptability of remote consultation is context specific and influenced by the purpose of the consultation and individual patient. Remote consultation may reduce anxiety in some patients, but is potentially less acceptable than face-to-face for relational appointments. Conclusions Acceptability of remote consultation is context dependent. There is a lack of evidence surrounding patient characteristics and access to remote consultation.https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241233969 |
| spellingShingle | Serena Antonio David Joseph Joanne Parsons Helen Atherton Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review Digital Health |
| title | Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review |
| title_full | Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review |
| title_short | Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review |
| title_sort | experiences of remote consultation in uk primary care for patients with mental health conditions a systematic review |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241233969 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT serenaantonio experiencesofremoteconsultationinukprimarycareforpatientswithmentalhealthconditionsasystematicreview AT davidjoseph experiencesofremoteconsultationinukprimarycareforpatientswithmentalhealthconditionsasystematicreview AT joanneparsons experiencesofremoteconsultationinukprimarycareforpatientswithmentalhealthconditionsasystematicreview AT helenatherton experiencesofremoteconsultationinukprimarycareforpatientswithmentalhealthconditionsasystematicreview |