Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy, the two most commonly used transurethral lithotripsy methods for treating bladder stones in children in Iraq. Between January 2013 and December 2016, 64 children with bladder stones were included in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziad H. Abd, Samir A. Muter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/513
_version_ 1797487013146918912
author Ziad H. Abd
Samir A. Muter
author_facet Ziad H. Abd
Samir A. Muter
author_sort Ziad H. Abd
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy, the two most commonly used transurethral lithotripsy methods for treating bladder stones in children in Iraq. Between January 2013 and December 2016, 64 children with bladder stones were included in this prospective randomized study, after ethical committee approval and written consent from the children’s parents or caregivers were obtained. Patients were assigned randomly by computer software to two groups treated with either pneumatic cystolithotripsy or laser lithotripsy. A 9 Fr. semirigid ureteroscope was used to pass the lithotripter through and fragment the stone. A catheter of 8–12 Fr. was then introduced and kept in place for 24 h. All children were hospitalized for 24 h, and the catheter was removed the next morning. Outpatient follow-up was maintained for 6–12 months. In terms of operation outcomes and complications, the laser lithotripsy group had a significantly longer duration of operation (74.5 ± 26.6 min vs. 51.5 ± 17.2 min, <i>p</i> = 0.001), whereas the number of patients requiring an extended hospital stay was significantly higher in the pneumatic lithotripsy group (48.5% vs. 16.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Moreover, pneumatic lithotripsy was associated with a significantly greater risk of having at least one adverse effect (64% greater than that in the laser group). Stone clearance rates did not significantly differ between treatment groups. In conclusion, both pneumatic and laser lithotripters can be used to treat children with bladder stones with high efficacy and safety.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:42:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e8a94ec296f490685232008188c96f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:42:37Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-1e8a94ec296f490685232008188c96f42023-11-23T16:49:36ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-01-0111351310.3390/jcm11030513Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in ChildrenZiad H. Abd0Samir A. Muter1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Anbar, Ramadi 31001, IraqDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10001, IraqThis study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy, the two most commonly used transurethral lithotripsy methods for treating bladder stones in children in Iraq. Between January 2013 and December 2016, 64 children with bladder stones were included in this prospective randomized study, after ethical committee approval and written consent from the children’s parents or caregivers were obtained. Patients were assigned randomly by computer software to two groups treated with either pneumatic cystolithotripsy or laser lithotripsy. A 9 Fr. semirigid ureteroscope was used to pass the lithotripter through and fragment the stone. A catheter of 8–12 Fr. was then introduced and kept in place for 24 h. All children were hospitalized for 24 h, and the catheter was removed the next morning. Outpatient follow-up was maintained for 6–12 months. In terms of operation outcomes and complications, the laser lithotripsy group had a significantly longer duration of operation (74.5 ± 26.6 min vs. 51.5 ± 17.2 min, <i>p</i> = 0.001), whereas the number of patients requiring an extended hospital stay was significantly higher in the pneumatic lithotripsy group (48.5% vs. 16.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Moreover, pneumatic lithotripsy was associated with a significantly greater risk of having at least one adverse effect (64% greater than that in the laser group). Stone clearance rates did not significantly differ between treatment groups. In conclusion, both pneumatic and laser lithotripters can be used to treat children with bladder stones with high efficacy and safety.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/513laser lithotripsypediatric urolithiasispneumatic lithotripsyvesical stone
spellingShingle Ziad H. Abd
Samir A. Muter
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children
Journal of Clinical Medicine
laser lithotripsy
pediatric urolithiasis
pneumatic lithotripsy
vesical stone
title Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children
title_full Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children
title_fullStr Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children
title_short Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children
title_sort comparison of the safety and efficacy of laser versus pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy for treatment of bladder stones in children
topic laser lithotripsy
pediatric urolithiasis
pneumatic lithotripsy
vesical stone
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/513
work_keys_str_mv AT ziadhabd comparisonofthesafetyandefficacyoflaserversuspneumaticintracorporeallithotripsyfortreatmentofbladderstonesinchildren
AT samiramuter comparisonofthesafetyandefficacyoflaserversuspneumaticintracorporeallithotripsyfortreatmentofbladderstonesinchildren