A Frequentist Alternative to Significance Testing, <i>p</i>-Values, and Confidence Intervals
There has been much debate about null hypothesis significance testing, <i>p</i>-values without null hypothesis significance testing, and confidence intervals. The first major section of the present article addresses some of the main reasons these procedures are problematic. The conclusio...
Main Author: | David Trafimow |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Econometrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/7/2/26 |
Similar Items
-
The reporting of p values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997–2017)
by: Locksley L. McV. Messam, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
Frequentist and Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: An Intuitive Guide for Urologists and Clinicians
by: José Gaona, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
The Inaccuracy of Sample-Based Confidence Intervals to Estimate A Priori Ones
by: David Trafimow, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology
by: Richard McNulty
Published: (2022-09-01) -
On the Influence of Religious Assumptions in Statistical Methods Used in Science
by: Cornelius Hunter
Published: (2020-12-01)