Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamics

<p>Numerous plant hydrodynamic models have started to be implemented in vegetation dynamics models, reflecting the central role of plant hydraulic traits in driving water, energy, and carbon cycles, as well as plant adaptation to climate change. Different numerical approximations of the govern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Y. Fang, L. R. Leung, R. Knox, C. Koven, B. Bond-Lamberty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-08-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/6385/2022/gmd-15-6385-2022.pdf
_version_ 1817996397493878784
author Y. Fang
L. R. Leung
R. Knox
C. Koven
B. Bond-Lamberty
author_facet Y. Fang
L. R. Leung
R. Knox
C. Koven
B. Bond-Lamberty
author_sort Y. Fang
collection DOAJ
description <p>Numerous plant hydrodynamic models have started to be implemented in vegetation dynamics models, reflecting the central role of plant hydraulic traits in driving water, energy, and carbon cycles, as well as plant adaptation to climate change. Different numerical approximations of the governing equations of the hydrodynamic models have been documented, but the numerical accuracy of these models and its subsequent effects on the simulated vegetation function and dynamics have rarely been evaluated. Using different numerical solution methods (including implicit and explicit approaches) and vertical discrete grid resolutions, we evaluated the numerical performance of a plant hydrodynamic module in the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES-HYDRO version 0.1) based on single-point and global simulations. Our simulation results showed that when near-surface vertical grid spacing is coarsened (grid size <span class="inline-formula"><i>&gt;</i>10</span> cm), the model significantly overestimates aboveground biomass (AGB) in most of the temperate forest locations and underestimates AGB in the boreal forest locations, as compared to a simulation with finer vertical grid spacing. Grid coarsening has a small effect on AGB in the tropical zones of Asia and South America. In particular, coarse surface grid resolution should not be used when there are large and prolonged water content differences among soil layers at depths due to long dry-season duration and/or well-drained soil or when soil evaporation is a dominant fraction of evapotranspiration. Similarly, coarse surface grid resolution should not be used when there is lithologic discontinuity along the soil depth. This information is useful for uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, or the training of surrogate models to design the simulations when computational cost limits the use of ensemble simulations.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-14T02:21:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e8ebc184fc54090b9c12d3c1ecdf831
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T02:21:43Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-1e8ebc184fc54090b9c12d3c1ecdf8312022-12-22T02:18:01ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032022-08-01156385639810.5194/gmd-15-6385-2022Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamicsY. Fang0L. R. Leung1R. Knox2C. Koven3B. Bond-Lamberty4Earth System Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USAAtmospheric Science and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USAClimate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USAClimate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USAAtmospheric Science and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA<p>Numerous plant hydrodynamic models have started to be implemented in vegetation dynamics models, reflecting the central role of plant hydraulic traits in driving water, energy, and carbon cycles, as well as plant adaptation to climate change. Different numerical approximations of the governing equations of the hydrodynamic models have been documented, but the numerical accuracy of these models and its subsequent effects on the simulated vegetation function and dynamics have rarely been evaluated. Using different numerical solution methods (including implicit and explicit approaches) and vertical discrete grid resolutions, we evaluated the numerical performance of a plant hydrodynamic module in the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES-HYDRO version 0.1) based on single-point and global simulations. Our simulation results showed that when near-surface vertical grid spacing is coarsened (grid size <span class="inline-formula"><i>&gt;</i>10</span> cm), the model significantly overestimates aboveground biomass (AGB) in most of the temperate forest locations and underestimates AGB in the boreal forest locations, as compared to a simulation with finer vertical grid spacing. Grid coarsening has a small effect on AGB in the tropical zones of Asia and South America. In particular, coarse surface grid resolution should not be used when there are large and prolonged water content differences among soil layers at depths due to long dry-season duration and/or well-drained soil or when soil evaporation is a dominant fraction of evapotranspiration. Similarly, coarse surface grid resolution should not be used when there is lithologic discontinuity along the soil depth. This information is useful for uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, or the training of surrogate models to design the simulations when computational cost limits the use of ensemble simulations.</p>https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/6385/2022/gmd-15-6385-2022.pdf
spellingShingle Y. Fang
L. R. Leung
R. Knox
C. Koven
B. Bond-Lamberty
Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamics
Geoscientific Model Development
title Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamics
title_full Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamics
title_fullStr Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamics
title_short Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamics
title_sort impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model v0 1 on vegetation dynamics
url https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/6385/2022/gmd-15-6385-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yfang impactofthenumericalsolutionapproachofaplanthydrodynamicmodelv01onvegetationdynamics
AT lrleung impactofthenumericalsolutionapproachofaplanthydrodynamicmodelv01onvegetationdynamics
AT rknox impactofthenumericalsolutionapproachofaplanthydrodynamicmodelv01onvegetationdynamics
AT ckoven impactofthenumericalsolutionapproachofaplanthydrodynamicmodelv01onvegetationdynamics
AT bbondlamberty impactofthenumericalsolutionapproachofaplanthydrodynamicmodelv01onvegetationdynamics