Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detection

A research algorithm is developed for noise evaluation and feature detection of the CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) Level 1 (L1) backscatter data with an emphasis on cloud/aerosol features in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT/LS). CALIOP measurement noise of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. L. Wu, J. H. Chae, A. Lambert, F. F. Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-03-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/2641/2011/acp-11-2641-2011.pdf
_version_ 1811216808914452480
author D. L. Wu
J. H. Chae
A. Lambert
F. F. Zhang
author_facet D. L. Wu
J. H. Chae
A. Lambert
F. F. Zhang
author_sort D. L. Wu
collection DOAJ
description A research algorithm is developed for noise evaluation and feature detection of the CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) Level 1 (L1) backscatter data with an emphasis on cloud/aerosol features in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT/LS). CALIOP measurement noise of the version v2.01 and v2.02 L1 backscatter data aggregated to (5 km) horizontal resolution is analyzed with two approaches in this study. One is to compare the observed and modeled molecular scatter profiles by scaling the modeled profile (with a fitted scaling factor α) to the observed clear-sky backscatter profiles. This scaling α value is sensitive to errors in the calibrated backscatter and the atmospheric model used. Most of the nighttime 532-nm α values are close to unity, as expected, but an abrupt drop occurred in October 2008 in the daytime 532-nm α, which is likely indicative of a problem in the v2.02 daytime calibrated data. The 1064-nm night α is generally close to 2 while its day α is ~3. The other approach to evaluate the lidar measurement noise is to use the calibrated lidar backscatter data at altitudes above 19 km. With this method, the 532-nm and 1064-nm measurement noises are analyzed and characterized individually for each profile in terms of the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ), showing larger σ values in general over landmasses or bright surfaces during day and in radiation-hard regions during night. A significant increasing trend is evident in the nighttime 1064-nm σ, which is likely responsible for the increasing difference between the feature occurrence frequencies (532-nm vs. 1064-nm) derived from this study. For feature detection with the research algorithm, we apply a σ–based method to the aggregated L1 data. The derived morphology of feature occurrence frequency is in general agreement with that obtained from the Level 2 (L2) 05 km_CLAY+05 km_ALAY products at 5 km horizontal resolution. Finally, a normalized probability density function (PDF) method is employed to evaluate the day-night backscatter data in which noise levels are largely different. CALIOP observations reveal a higher probability of daytime cloud/aerosol occurrence than nighttime in the tropical UT/LS region for 532-nm total backscatters >0.01 km<sup>−1</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup>.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:44:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e96e31282eb479f96ab0fe9bd29277f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:44:28Z
publishDate 2011-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-1e96e31282eb479f96ab0fe9bd29277f2022-12-22T03:43:35ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242011-03-011162641265410.5194/acp-11-2641-2011Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detectionD. L. WuJ. H. ChaeA. LambertF. F. ZhangA research algorithm is developed for noise evaluation and feature detection of the CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) Level 1 (L1) backscatter data with an emphasis on cloud/aerosol features in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT/LS). CALIOP measurement noise of the version v2.01 and v2.02 L1 backscatter data aggregated to (5 km) horizontal resolution is analyzed with two approaches in this study. One is to compare the observed and modeled molecular scatter profiles by scaling the modeled profile (with a fitted scaling factor α) to the observed clear-sky backscatter profiles. This scaling α value is sensitive to errors in the calibrated backscatter and the atmospheric model used. Most of the nighttime 532-nm α values are close to unity, as expected, but an abrupt drop occurred in October 2008 in the daytime 532-nm α, which is likely indicative of a problem in the v2.02 daytime calibrated data. The 1064-nm night α is generally close to 2 while its day α is ~3. The other approach to evaluate the lidar measurement noise is to use the calibrated lidar backscatter data at altitudes above 19 km. With this method, the 532-nm and 1064-nm measurement noises are analyzed and characterized individually for each profile in terms of the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ), showing larger σ values in general over landmasses or bright surfaces during day and in radiation-hard regions during night. A significant increasing trend is evident in the nighttime 1064-nm σ, which is likely responsible for the increasing difference between the feature occurrence frequencies (532-nm vs. 1064-nm) derived from this study. For feature detection with the research algorithm, we apply a σ–based method to the aggregated L1 data. The derived morphology of feature occurrence frequency is in general agreement with that obtained from the Level 2 (L2) 05 km_CLAY+05 km_ALAY products at 5 km horizontal resolution. Finally, a normalized probability density function (PDF) method is employed to evaluate the day-night backscatter data in which noise levels are largely different. CALIOP observations reveal a higher probability of daytime cloud/aerosol occurrence than nighttime in the tropical UT/LS region for 532-nm total backscatters >0.01 km<sup>−1</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup>.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/2641/2011/acp-11-2641-2011.pdf
spellingShingle D. L. Wu
J. H. Chae
A. Lambert
F. F. Zhang
Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detection
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detection
title_full Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detection
title_fullStr Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detection
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detection
title_short Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detection
title_sort characteristics of caliop attenuated backscatter noise implication for cloud aerosol detection
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/2641/2011/acp-11-2641-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dlwu characteristicsofcaliopattenuatedbackscatternoiseimplicationforcloudaerosoldetection
AT jhchae characteristicsofcaliopattenuatedbackscatternoiseimplicationforcloudaerosoldetection
AT alambert characteristicsofcaliopattenuatedbackscatternoiseimplicationforcloudaerosoldetection
AT ffzhang characteristicsofcaliopattenuatedbackscatternoiseimplicationforcloudaerosoldetection