Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect Testes de triagem não são suficientes para diagnosticar heminegligência
OBJECTIVE: To verify the sensitivity of the conventional subtests of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) in the diagnosis of hemineglect after stroke. METHOD: One hundred and two patients with cerebral infarct or hemorrhage were prospectively evaluated. In 22, hemineglect was diagnosed using stand...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia (ABNEURO)
2007-12-01
|
| Series: | Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2007000700019 |
| Summary: | OBJECTIVE: To verify the sensitivity of the conventional subtests of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) in the diagnosis of hemineglect after stroke. METHOD: One hundred and two patients with cerebral infarct or hemorrhage were prospectively evaluated. In 22, hemineglect was diagnosed using standard BIT criteria. The frequency of hemineglect using 6 commonly used screening subtests of this battery was assessed. RESULTS: Hemineglect would not be recognized in 10 patients if they were only screened using the line crossing test; this would be the case in 2 patients with the letter cancellation test; and in 4 patient with the line bisection test. Three patients would not be diagnosed even if both line crossing and line bisection tests were used. CONCLUSION: Hemineglect may not be recognized with single screening tests commonly used. The use of a standard battery is recommended to improve diagnostic sensitivity in individuals with various subtypes of hemineglect.<br>OBJETIVO: Verificar a sensibilidade dos subtestes convencionais da Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) no diagnóstico da heminegligência após o acidente vascular cerebral (AVC). MÉTODO: Foram avaliados prospectivamente 102 pacientes com AVC. Em 22 casos heminegligência foi diagnosticada através do BIT. A freqüência de diagnóstico correto utilizando os 6 subtestes específicos desta bateria foi analisada. RESULTADOS: 10 pacientes não seriam diagnosticados como heminegligentes se fossem avaliados apenas com o " line crossing" , 2 se o teste de triagem escolhido fosse o " letter cancellation" , e 4 se utilizássemos apenas o " line bisection" . Além disso, 3 pacientes não teriam recebido o diagnóstico correto mesmo utilizando dois testes usuais de triagem - " line crossing" e " line bisection" . CONCLUSÃO: O uso de testes isolados de triagem pode falhar em diagnosticar heminegligência após o AVC. O uso de uma bateria formal de avaliação é necessário para identificar indivíduos com diferentes tipos de heminegligência. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0004-282X 1678-4227 |