The Compatibility of Evolution and Thomistic Metaphysics: A Reply to Dennis F. Polis
In this article the author discusses Dennis F. Polis’ defense of the compatibility of biological evolution and Thomistic metaphysics. Some of Polis’ methodological and metaphysical arguments are examined and it is explained why they are unfaithful to the Thomistic tradition of metaphysics. There is...
Main Author: | Robert A. Delfino |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Étienne Gilson Society
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Studia Gilsoniana |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/1202392.pdf |
Similar Items
-
The Flexibility of Thomistic Metaphysical Principles: Byzantine Thomists, Personalist Thomists, and Jacques Maritain
by: Mark K. Spencer
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Metaphysics after Aquinas
by: Moses Aaron T. Angeles
Published: (2007-12-01) -
Classical Metaphysics and Theistic Evolution: Why Are They Incompatible?
by: Michał Chaberek
Published: (2019-03-01) -
El debate en torno al ‘argumento del intellectus essentiae’ y la ‘distinción real’ entre la esencia y el ser en el De ente et essentia de Tomás de Aquino [The Debate on the ‘Intellectus Essentiae Argument’ and the ‘Real Distinction’ between Essence and Being in the De Ente et Essentia by Thomas Aquinas]
by: Fernanda Ocampo
Published: (2018-06-01) -
"Uno para todos y todos para uno": la cuestión de los universales en "el ente y la esencia" de tomás de aquino
by: Vargas B Cristóbal