Evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorations
Abstract Background The aim of the study is to assess the bonding of two repair methods for zirconia. Null hypothesis Repair of zirconia with Cojet (3M Cojet sand, 68,411) and clearfil (clearfil REPAIR Kuraray Japan) has the same effect on the bond strength of zirconia restorations. Zirconia blocks...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | Bulletin of the National Research Centre |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-022-00900-2 |
| _version_ | 1811218263249518592 |
|---|---|
| author | Rami M. Galal Ghada E. Hamza Menatallah M. ElHotieby |
| author_facet | Rami M. Galal Ghada E. Hamza Menatallah M. ElHotieby |
| author_sort | Rami M. Galal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The aim of the study is to assess the bonding of two repair methods for zirconia. Null hypothesis Repair of zirconia with Cojet (3M Cojet sand, 68,411) and clearfil (clearfil REPAIR Kuraray Japan) has the same effect on the bond strength of zirconia restorations. Zirconia blocks were sliced before sintering into 28 samples (inCorisZI mono L), surface treated with two repair methods (Cojet and clearfil) then bonded to composite. Storage and thermocycling was done then loaded under shear until failure. Shear bond strength was collected and statistically analyzed. Graph pad Instat (Graph Pad, Inc.) software for windows was used for analyzing results. Results It was found that COJ surface treatment recorded statistically non-significant higher shear bond strength mean value (8.45 ± 0.70 Mpa) than CLE surface treatment (7.67 ± 2.55 Mpa) as indicated by paired t-test. Conclusion It was concluded that bond strength between composite resin and inCoris ZI mono L is the same in resistance to shear stresses after Cojet surface treatment and after Clearfil surface treatment. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:06:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1ecca56aa4f34f77abb6974442e5c1ee |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2522-8307 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:06:52Z |
| publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Bulletin of the National Research Centre |
| spelling | doaj.art-1ecca56aa4f34f77abb6974442e5c1ee2022-12-22T03:42:45ZengSpringerOpenBulletin of the National Research Centre2522-83072022-07-014611610.1186/s42269-022-00900-2Evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorationsRami M. Galal0Ghada E. Hamza1Menatallah M. ElHotieby2Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics Department, National Research CentreFixed and Removable Prosthodontics Department, National Research CentreFixed and Removable Prosthodontics Department, National Research CentreAbstract Background The aim of the study is to assess the bonding of two repair methods for zirconia. Null hypothesis Repair of zirconia with Cojet (3M Cojet sand, 68,411) and clearfil (clearfil REPAIR Kuraray Japan) has the same effect on the bond strength of zirconia restorations. Zirconia blocks were sliced before sintering into 28 samples (inCorisZI mono L), surface treated with two repair methods (Cojet and clearfil) then bonded to composite. Storage and thermocycling was done then loaded under shear until failure. Shear bond strength was collected and statistically analyzed. Graph pad Instat (Graph Pad, Inc.) software for windows was used for analyzing results. Results It was found that COJ surface treatment recorded statistically non-significant higher shear bond strength mean value (8.45 ± 0.70 Mpa) than CLE surface treatment (7.67 ± 2.55 Mpa) as indicated by paired t-test. Conclusion It was concluded that bond strength between composite resin and inCoris ZI mono L is the same in resistance to shear stresses after Cojet surface treatment and after Clearfil surface treatment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-022-00900-2RepairBondZirconia |
| spellingShingle | Rami M. Galal Ghada E. Hamza Menatallah M. ElHotieby Evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorations Bulletin of the National Research Centre Repair Bond Zirconia |
| title | Evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorations |
| title_full | Evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorations |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorations |
| title_short | Evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorations |
| title_sort | evaluation of repair bond strength with different methods for zirconia restorations |
| topic | Repair Bond Zirconia |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-022-00900-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ramimgalal evaluationofrepairbondstrengthwithdifferentmethodsforzirconiarestorations AT ghadaehamza evaluationofrepairbondstrengthwithdifferentmethodsforzirconiarestorations AT menatallahmelhotieby evaluationofrepairbondstrengthwithdifferentmethodsforzirconiarestorations |