Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM)

Abstract Background Pre hospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA) is a complex procedure with significant risks. First-pass intubation success (FPS) is recommended as a quality indicator in pre hospital advanced airway management. Previous data demonstrating significantly lower FPS by non-physicians doe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Price, Kate Lachowycz, Alistair Steel, Lyle Moncur, Rob Major, Ed B. G. Barnard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-07-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01032-2
_version_ 1828774921489088512
author James Price
Kate Lachowycz
Alistair Steel
Lyle Moncur
Rob Major
Ed B. G. Barnard
author_facet James Price
Kate Lachowycz
Alistair Steel
Lyle Moncur
Rob Major
Ed B. G. Barnard
author_sort James Price
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Pre hospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA) is a complex procedure with significant risks. First-pass intubation success (FPS) is recommended as a quality indicator in pre hospital advanced airway management. Previous data demonstrating significantly lower FPS by non-physicians does not distinguish between non-physicians operating in isolation or within physician teams. In several UK HEMS, the role of the intubating provider is interchangeable between the physician and critical care paramedic—termed the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM). The objectives of this study were to compare first-pass intubation success rate between physicians and critical care paramedics (CCP) in a large regional, multi-organisational dataset of trauma PHEA patients, and to report the application of the ICOM. Methods A retrospective observational study of consecutive trauma patients ≥ 16 years old who underwent PHEA at two different ICOM Helicopter Emergency Medical Services in the East of England, 2015–2020. Data are presented as number (percentage) and median [inter-quartile range]. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare proportions, reported as odds ratio (OR (95% confidence interval, 95% CI)), p value. The study design complied with the STROBE (Strengthening The Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology) reporting guidelines. Results In the study period, 13,654 patients were attended. 674 (4.9%) trauma patients ≥ 16 years old who underwent PHEA were included in the final analysis: the median age was 44 [28–63] years old, and 502 (74.5%) were male. There was no significant difference in the FPS rate between physicians and CCPs—90.2% and 87.4% respectively, OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.7–2.5), p = 0.38. The cumulative first, second, third, and fourth-pass intubation success rates were 89.6%, 98.7%, 99.7%, and 100%. Patients who had a physician-operated initial intubation attempt weighed more and had a higher heart rate, compared to those who had a CCP-operated initial attempt. Conclusion In an ICOM setting, we demonstrated 100% intubation success in adult trauma patients undergoing PHEA. There was no significant difference in first-pass intubation success between physicians and CCPs.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T15:29:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1edc3e02e9c9454fbe1e9cb1a5c89018
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-7241
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T15:29:55Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-1edc3e02e9c9454fbe1e9cb1a5c890182022-12-22T01:00:05ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412022-07-013011810.1186/s13049-022-01032-2Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM)James Price0Kate Lachowycz1Alistair Steel2Lyle Moncur3Rob Major4Ed B. G. Barnard5Department of Research, Audit, Innovation, and Development (RAID), East Anglian Air Ambulance, Helimed HouseDepartment of Research, Audit, Innovation, and Development (RAID), East Anglian Air Ambulance, Helimed HouseMagpas Air Ambulance, Centenary HouseDepartment of Research, Audit, Innovation, and Development (RAID), East Anglian Air Ambulance, Helimed HouseDepartment of Research, Audit, Innovation, and Development (RAID), East Anglian Air Ambulance, Helimed HouseDepartment of Research, Audit, Innovation, and Development (RAID), East Anglian Air Ambulance, Helimed HouseAbstract Background Pre hospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA) is a complex procedure with significant risks. First-pass intubation success (FPS) is recommended as a quality indicator in pre hospital advanced airway management. Previous data demonstrating significantly lower FPS by non-physicians does not distinguish between non-physicians operating in isolation or within physician teams. In several UK HEMS, the role of the intubating provider is interchangeable between the physician and critical care paramedic—termed the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM). The objectives of this study were to compare first-pass intubation success rate between physicians and critical care paramedics (CCP) in a large regional, multi-organisational dataset of trauma PHEA patients, and to report the application of the ICOM. Methods A retrospective observational study of consecutive trauma patients ≥ 16 years old who underwent PHEA at two different ICOM Helicopter Emergency Medical Services in the East of England, 2015–2020. Data are presented as number (percentage) and median [inter-quartile range]. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare proportions, reported as odds ratio (OR (95% confidence interval, 95% CI)), p value. The study design complied with the STROBE (Strengthening The Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology) reporting guidelines. Results In the study period, 13,654 patients were attended. 674 (4.9%) trauma patients ≥ 16 years old who underwent PHEA were included in the final analysis: the median age was 44 [28–63] years old, and 502 (74.5%) were male. There was no significant difference in the FPS rate between physicians and CCPs—90.2% and 87.4% respectively, OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.7–2.5), p = 0.38. The cumulative first, second, third, and fourth-pass intubation success rates were 89.6%, 98.7%, 99.7%, and 100%. Patients who had a physician-operated initial intubation attempt weighed more and had a higher heart rate, compared to those who had a CCP-operated initial attempt. Conclusion In an ICOM setting, we demonstrated 100% intubation success in adult trauma patients undergoing PHEA. There was no significant difference in first-pass intubation success between physicians and CCPs.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01032-2Pre hospital careHEMSRSIPHEAIntubation
spellingShingle James Price
Kate Lachowycz
Alistair Steel
Lyle Moncur
Rob Major
Ed B. G. Barnard
Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM)
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Pre hospital care
HEMS
RSI
PHEA
Intubation
title Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM)
title_full Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM)
title_fullStr Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM)
title_full_unstemmed Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM)
title_short Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM)
title_sort intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia a retrospective observational analysis of the inter changeable operator model icom
topic Pre hospital care
HEMS
RSI
PHEA
Intubation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01032-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesprice intubationsuccessinprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaaretrospectiveobservationalanalysisoftheinterchangeableoperatormodelicom
AT katelachowycz intubationsuccessinprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaaretrospectiveobservationalanalysisoftheinterchangeableoperatormodelicom
AT alistairsteel intubationsuccessinprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaaretrospectiveobservationalanalysisoftheinterchangeableoperatormodelicom
AT lylemoncur intubationsuccessinprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaaretrospectiveobservationalanalysisoftheinterchangeableoperatormodelicom
AT robmajor intubationsuccessinprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaaretrospectiveobservationalanalysisoftheinterchangeableoperatormodelicom
AT edbgbarnard intubationsuccessinprehospitalemergencyanaesthesiaaretrospectiveobservationalanalysisoftheinterchangeableoperatormodelicom