Calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using BeoH

Fission product yields (FPY) are important for a variety of applications (reactor neutronics, spent fuel, dosimetry, radiochemistry, etc.) and are currently included in many of the evaluated libraries around the world. The FPYs in the current US evaluation, ENDF/B-VIII.0, are mainly based on the 199...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lovell A. E., Kawano T., Talou P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2023-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2023/07/epjconf_cw2023_00018.pdf
_version_ 1797850689650556928
author Lovell A. E.
Kawano T.
Talou P.
author_facet Lovell A. E.
Kawano T.
Talou P.
author_sort Lovell A. E.
collection DOAJ
description Fission product yields (FPY) are important for a variety of applications (reactor neutronics, spent fuel, dosimetry, radiochemistry, etc.) and are currently included in many of the evaluated libraries around the world. The FPYs in the current US evaluation, ENDF/B-VIII.0, are mainly based on the 1994 evaluation of England and Rider and have only had slight updates—such as the inclusion of a 2 MeV point for 239Pu—since their development. Additionally, only mean values and uncertainties are included in the evaluation, not full correlations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, in collaboration with several other institutes, has been working on an updated evaluation for the FPYs of 239Pu(n,f), 235U(n,f), 238U(n,f), and 252Cf(sf) using the deterministic, Hauser-Feshbach, fission fragment decay code, BeoH. BeoH calculates the FPYs consistently with many other prompt and delayed fission observables, explicitly taking into account multi-chance fission and ensuring consistency between observables. In addition to providing updated means and uncertainties for the FPYs on a pointwise energy grid from thermal to 20 MeV, we calculate correlations between all FPYs at each incident energy and across incident energies. Here, we discuss the development of these covariance matrices, differences in the correlations between FPYs based on the parameters that are included in the model optimization, and correlations across incident energies for neutron-induced fission.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:05:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1eecd84caa844c779dab43206ed04e9d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2100-014X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:05:30Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series EPJ Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-1eecd84caa844c779dab43206ed04e9d2023-04-07T09:02:20ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2023-01-012810001810.1051/epjconf/202328100018epjconf_cw2023_00018Calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using BeoHLovell A. E.0Kawano T.1Talou P.2Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos National LaboratoryFission product yields (FPY) are important for a variety of applications (reactor neutronics, spent fuel, dosimetry, radiochemistry, etc.) and are currently included in many of the evaluated libraries around the world. The FPYs in the current US evaluation, ENDF/B-VIII.0, are mainly based on the 1994 evaluation of England and Rider and have only had slight updates—such as the inclusion of a 2 MeV point for 239Pu—since their development. Additionally, only mean values and uncertainties are included in the evaluation, not full correlations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, in collaboration with several other institutes, has been working on an updated evaluation for the FPYs of 239Pu(n,f), 235U(n,f), 238U(n,f), and 252Cf(sf) using the deterministic, Hauser-Feshbach, fission fragment decay code, BeoH. BeoH calculates the FPYs consistently with many other prompt and delayed fission observables, explicitly taking into account multi-chance fission and ensuring consistency between observables. In addition to providing updated means and uncertainties for the FPYs on a pointwise energy grid from thermal to 20 MeV, we calculate correlations between all FPYs at each incident energy and across incident energies. Here, we discuss the development of these covariance matrices, differences in the correlations between FPYs based on the parameters that are included in the model optimization, and correlations across incident energies for neutron-induced fission.https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2023/07/epjconf_cw2023_00018.pdf
spellingShingle Lovell A. E.
Kawano T.
Talou P.
Calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using BeoH
EPJ Web of Conferences
title Calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using BeoH
title_full Calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using BeoH
title_fullStr Calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using BeoH
title_full_unstemmed Calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using BeoH
title_short Calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using BeoH
title_sort calculated covariance matrices for fission product yields using beoh
url https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2023/07/epjconf_cw2023_00018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lovellae calculatedcovariancematricesforfissionproductyieldsusingbeoh
AT kawanot calculatedcovariancematricesforfissionproductyieldsusingbeoh
AT taloup calculatedcovariancematricesforfissionproductyieldsusingbeoh