The Good, the Bad and the Uncertain: Bioenergy Use in the European Union

As the EU is moving towards a low carbon economy and seeks to further develop its renewable energy policy, this paper quantitatively investigates the impact of plausible energy market reforms from the perspective of bio-renewables. Employing a state-of-the-art biobased variant of a computable genera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George Philippidis, Heleen Bartelings, John Helming, Robert M’barek, Edward Smeets, Hans van Meijl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-10-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2703
_version_ 1811279835221196800
author George Philippidis
Heleen Bartelings
John Helming
Robert M’barek
Edward Smeets
Hans van Meijl
author_facet George Philippidis
Heleen Bartelings
John Helming
Robert M’barek
Edward Smeets
Hans van Meijl
author_sort George Philippidis
collection DOAJ
description As the EU is moving towards a low carbon economy and seeks to further develop its renewable energy policy, this paper quantitatively investigates the impact of plausible energy market reforms from the perspective of bio-renewables. Employing a state-of-the-art biobased variant of a computable general equilibrium model, this study assesses the perceived medium-term benefits, risks and trade-offs which arise from an advanced biofuels plan, two exploratory scenarios of a more ‘sustainable’ conventional biofuels plan and a ‘no-mandate’ scenario. Consistent with more recent studies, none of the scenarios considered present significant challenges to EU food-security or agricultural land usage. An illustrative advanced biofuels plan simulation requires non-trivial public support to implement whilst a degree of competition for biomass with (high-value) advanced biomass material industries is observed. On the other hand, it significantly alleviates land use pressures, whilst lignocellulose biomass prices are not expected to increase to unsustainable levels. Clearly, these observations are subject to assumptions on technological change, sustainable biomass limits, expected trends in fossil fuel prices and EU access to third-country trade. With these same caveats in mind, the switch to increased bioethanol production does not result in significant market tensions in biomass markets.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:02:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f07a30d97cd4abaa78ee3361d418aec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:02:57Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-1f07a30d97cd4abaa78ee3361d418aec2022-12-22T03:09:26ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-10-011110270310.3390/en11102703en11102703The Good, the Bad and the Uncertain: Bioenergy Use in the European UnionGeorge Philippidis0Heleen Bartelings1John Helming2Robert M’barek3Edward Smeets4Hans van Meijl5Joint Research Centre, European Commission, 41092 Seville, SpainWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, Alexanderveld 5, 2585 The Hague, The NetherlandsWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, Alexanderveld 5, 2585 The Hague, The NetherlandsJoint Research Centre, European Commission, 41092 Seville, SpainWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, Alexanderveld 5, 2585 The Hague, The NetherlandsWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, Alexanderveld 5, 2585 The Hague, The NetherlandsAs the EU is moving towards a low carbon economy and seeks to further develop its renewable energy policy, this paper quantitatively investigates the impact of plausible energy market reforms from the perspective of bio-renewables. Employing a state-of-the-art biobased variant of a computable general equilibrium model, this study assesses the perceived medium-term benefits, risks and trade-offs which arise from an advanced biofuels plan, two exploratory scenarios of a more ‘sustainable’ conventional biofuels plan and a ‘no-mandate’ scenario. Consistent with more recent studies, none of the scenarios considered present significant challenges to EU food-security or agricultural land usage. An illustrative advanced biofuels plan simulation requires non-trivial public support to implement whilst a degree of competition for biomass with (high-value) advanced biomass material industries is observed. On the other hand, it significantly alleviates land use pressures, whilst lignocellulose biomass prices are not expected to increase to unsustainable levels. Clearly, these observations are subject to assumptions on technological change, sustainable biomass limits, expected trends in fossil fuel prices and EU access to third-country trade. With these same caveats in mind, the switch to increased bioethanol production does not result in significant market tensions in biomass markets.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2703biomassbio-energybio-chemicalsadvanced technologiesagricultural productiontradeland useeconomic modellingMAGNET model
spellingShingle George Philippidis
Heleen Bartelings
John Helming
Robert M’barek
Edward Smeets
Hans van Meijl
The Good, the Bad and the Uncertain: Bioenergy Use in the European Union
Energies
biomass
bio-energy
bio-chemicals
advanced technologies
agricultural production
trade
land use
economic modelling
MAGNET model
title The Good, the Bad and the Uncertain: Bioenergy Use in the European Union
title_full The Good, the Bad and the Uncertain: Bioenergy Use in the European Union
title_fullStr The Good, the Bad and the Uncertain: Bioenergy Use in the European Union
title_full_unstemmed The Good, the Bad and the Uncertain: Bioenergy Use in the European Union
title_short The Good, the Bad and the Uncertain: Bioenergy Use in the European Union
title_sort good the bad and the uncertain bioenergy use in the european union
topic biomass
bio-energy
bio-chemicals
advanced technologies
agricultural production
trade
land use
economic modelling
MAGNET model
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2703
work_keys_str_mv AT georgephilippidis thegoodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT heleenbartelings thegoodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT johnhelming thegoodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT robertmbarek thegoodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT edwardsmeets thegoodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT hansvanmeijl thegoodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT georgephilippidis goodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT heleenbartelings goodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT johnhelming goodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT robertmbarek goodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT edwardsmeets goodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion
AT hansvanmeijl goodthebadandtheuncertainbioenergyuseintheeuropeanunion