Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GIS

approaches to a flood management strategy. One of the most important steps is identifying flood-vulnerable areas. A flood vulnerability assessment is necessary to identify the areas. Currently, research on flood vulnerability assessment uses different indicators to determine the flood vulnerability...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I Gusti Agung Putu Eryani, Made Widya Jayantari, Suzana Ramli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Mercu Buana 2023-12-01
Series:Jurnal Ilmiah SINERGI
Subjects:
Online Access:https://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/sinergi/article/view/20048
_version_ 1797353650346000384
author I Gusti Agung Putu Eryani
Made Widya Jayantari
Suzana Ramli
author_facet I Gusti Agung Putu Eryani
Made Widya Jayantari
Suzana Ramli
author_sort I Gusti Agung Putu Eryani
collection DOAJ
description approaches to a flood management strategy. One of the most important steps is identifying flood-vulnerable areas. A flood vulnerability assessment is necessary to identify the areas. Currently, research on flood vulnerability assessment uses different indicators to determine the flood vulnerability level. However, it is unknown how the number of indicators used to assess flood vulnerability affects the results. This research aimed to determine the effect of the number of indicators used in estimating flood vulnerability using the AHP-GIS method on the resulting flood vulnerability level. Therefore, this research analyzed the weight of each indicator for five scenarios using the AHP method. This step is continued using GIS to create an overlay map to calculate each scenario's flood hazard index. The indicators used to determine the flood vulnerability index include elevation, slope, flow accumulation, drainage distance, land use, soil type, and annual rainfall intensity. The results showed that the reduction of indicators from seven to six caused the areas with moderate and very high levels of flood vulnerability to increase, while those with high levels decreased. Meanwhile, the reduction from six to five indicators caused the areas with low and moderate vulnerability to reduce, while those with high and very high levels increased. It was also discovered that when the indicators were changed from five to four, the areas with moderate and high vulnerability increased while those with very high levels decreased.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:34:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f0b0c6982f94faea6ff6963f892099e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1410-2331
2460-1217
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:34:06Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Universitas Mercu Buana
record_format Article
series Jurnal Ilmiah SINERGI
spelling doaj.art-1f0b0c6982f94faea6ff6963f892099e2024-01-17T01:17:34ZengUniversitas Mercu BuanaJurnal Ilmiah SINERGI1410-23312460-12172023-12-01281132210.22441/sinergi.2024.1.0026824Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GISI Gusti Agung Putu Eryani0Made Widya Jayantari1Suzana Ramli2Department of Civil Engineering, Warmadewa UniversityDepartment of Civil Engineering, Udayana UniversitySchool of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARAapproaches to a flood management strategy. One of the most important steps is identifying flood-vulnerable areas. A flood vulnerability assessment is necessary to identify the areas. Currently, research on flood vulnerability assessment uses different indicators to determine the flood vulnerability level. However, it is unknown how the number of indicators used to assess flood vulnerability affects the results. This research aimed to determine the effect of the number of indicators used in estimating flood vulnerability using the AHP-GIS method on the resulting flood vulnerability level. Therefore, this research analyzed the weight of each indicator for five scenarios using the AHP method. This step is continued using GIS to create an overlay map to calculate each scenario's flood hazard index. The indicators used to determine the flood vulnerability index include elevation, slope, flow accumulation, drainage distance, land use, soil type, and annual rainfall intensity. The results showed that the reduction of indicators from seven to six caused the areas with moderate and very high levels of flood vulnerability to increase, while those with high levels decreased. Meanwhile, the reduction from six to five indicators caused the areas with low and moderate vulnerability to reduce, while those with high and very high levels increased. It was also discovered that when the indicators were changed from five to four, the areas with moderate and high vulnerability increased while those with very high levels decreased.https://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/sinergi/article/view/20048ahpfloodgisvulnerability
spellingShingle I Gusti Agung Putu Eryani
Made Widya Jayantari
Suzana Ramli
Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GIS
Jurnal Ilmiah SINERGI
ahp
flood
gis
vulnerability
title Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GIS
title_full Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GIS
title_fullStr Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GIS
title_full_unstemmed Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GIS
title_short Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GIS
title_sort determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using ahp gis
topic ahp
flood
gis
vulnerability
url https://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/sinergi/article/view/20048
work_keys_str_mv AT igustiagungputueryani determinationoffloodvulnerabilitylevelbasedondifferentnumbersofindicatorsusingahpgis
AT madewidyajayantari determinationoffloodvulnerabilitylevelbasedondifferentnumbersofindicatorsusingahpgis
AT suzanaramli determinationoffloodvulnerabilitylevelbasedondifferentnumbersofindicatorsusingahpgis