Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]

A correction of an article originally published in vol 17 (2017). In 1675, the anonymous Letter to a Person of Quality was condemned in the House of Lords and ordered to be burned by the public hangman.  A propagandistic work that has long been attributed to Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Sh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D. N. DeLuna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Libraries, The University of Western Ontario 2018-12-01
Series:Locke Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/locke/article/view/6177
_version_ 1828088874326294528
author D. N. DeLuna
author_facet D. N. DeLuna
author_sort D. N. DeLuna
collection DOAJ
description A correction of an article originally published in vol 17 (2017). In 1675, the anonymous Letter to a Person of Quality was condemned in the House of Lords and ordered to be burned by the public hangman.  A propagandistic work that has long been attributed to Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, and less certainly to his secretary John Locke, it traduced hard-line Anglican legislation considered in Parliament that year—namely the Test Bill, proposing that office-holders and MPs swear off political militancy and indeed any efforts to reform the Church and State.  Careful examination of the text of the Letter, and that of one of its sources in the Reasons against the Bill for the Test, also circulated in 1675, reveals the presence of highly seditious passages of covert historical allegory.  Hitherto un-noted by modern scholars, this allegory compared King Charles II to the weak and intermittently mad Henry VI, while agitating for armed revolt against a government made prey to popish and French captors.  The discovery compels modification, through chronological revision and also re-assessment of the probability of Locke’s authorship of the Letter, of Richard Ashcraft’s picture of Shaftesbury and Locke as first-time revolutionaries for the cause of religious tolerance in the early 1680s.  Even more significantly, it lends support to Ashcraft’s view of the nature and intent of duplicitous published writings from the Shaftesbury circle, whose members included Robert Ferguson, ‘the Plotter’ and pamphleteer at home in the world of skilled biblical hermeneutics.  Cultivated for stealthy revolutionary purposes, these writings came with designs of engaging discrete reading networks within England’s culture of Protestant dissent.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:31:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f0e1d3469f2424da07afbd588a255bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-925X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:31:10Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Western Libraries, The University of Western Ontario
record_format Article
series Locke Studies
spelling doaj.art-1f0e1d3469f2424da07afbd588a255bd2022-12-22T17:00:28ZengWestern Libraries, The University of Western OntarioLocke Studies2561-925X2018-12-0118110.5206/ls.2018.6177Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]D. N. DeLuna0University College London A correction of an article originally published in vol 17 (2017). In 1675, the anonymous Letter to a Person of Quality was condemned in the House of Lords and ordered to be burned by the public hangman.  A propagandistic work that has long been attributed to Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, and less certainly to his secretary John Locke, it traduced hard-line Anglican legislation considered in Parliament that year—namely the Test Bill, proposing that office-holders and MPs swear off political militancy and indeed any efforts to reform the Church and State.  Careful examination of the text of the Letter, and that of one of its sources in the Reasons against the Bill for the Test, also circulated in 1675, reveals the presence of highly seditious passages of covert historical allegory.  Hitherto un-noted by modern scholars, this allegory compared King Charles II to the weak and intermittently mad Henry VI, while agitating for armed revolt against a government made prey to popish and French captors.  The discovery compels modification, through chronological revision and also re-assessment of the probability of Locke’s authorship of the Letter, of Richard Ashcraft’s picture of Shaftesbury and Locke as first-time revolutionaries for the cause of religious tolerance in the early 1680s.  Even more significantly, it lends support to Ashcraft’s view of the nature and intent of duplicitous published writings from the Shaftesbury circle, whose members included Robert Ferguson, ‘the Plotter’ and pamphleteer at home in the world of skilled biblical hermeneutics.  Cultivated for stealthy revolutionary purposes, these writings came with designs of engaging discrete reading networks within England’s culture of Protestant dissent. https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/locke/article/view/6177John LockeAnthony Ashley Cooper1st Earl of ShaftesburyA Letter from a Person of Quality (1675)Robert Ferguson the PlotterExclusion Crisis
spellingShingle D. N. DeLuna
Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]
Locke Studies
John Locke
Anthony Ashley Cooper
1st Earl of Shaftesbury
A Letter from a Person of Quality (1675)
Robert Ferguson the Plotter
Exclusion Crisis
title Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]
title_full Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]
title_fullStr Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]
title_full_unstemmed Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]
title_short Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]
title_sort shaftesbury locke and their revolutionary letter corrigendum
topic John Locke
Anthony Ashley Cooper
1st Earl of Shaftesbury
A Letter from a Person of Quality (1675)
Robert Ferguson the Plotter
Exclusion Crisis
url https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/locke/article/view/6177
work_keys_str_mv AT dndeluna shaftesburylockeandtheirrevolutionarylettercorrigendum