Endogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissues

Abstract Background Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that allows a subset of genes to be expressed mono-allelically based on the parent of origin and is typically regulated by differential DNA methylation inherited from gametes. Imprinting is pervasive in murine extra-embryonic lineage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Courtney W. Hanna, Raquel Pérez-Palacios, Lenka Gahurova, Michael Schubert, Felix Krueger, Laura Biggins, Simon Andrews, Maria Colomé-Tatché, Deborah Bourc’his, Wendy Dean, Gavin Kelsey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-10-01
Series:Genome Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-019-1833-x
_version_ 1818151815065108480
author Courtney W. Hanna
Raquel Pérez-Palacios
Lenka Gahurova
Michael Schubert
Felix Krueger
Laura Biggins
Simon Andrews
Maria Colomé-Tatché
Deborah Bourc’his
Wendy Dean
Gavin Kelsey
author_facet Courtney W. Hanna
Raquel Pérez-Palacios
Lenka Gahurova
Michael Schubert
Felix Krueger
Laura Biggins
Simon Andrews
Maria Colomé-Tatché
Deborah Bourc’his
Wendy Dean
Gavin Kelsey
author_sort Courtney W. Hanna
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that allows a subset of genes to be expressed mono-allelically based on the parent of origin and is typically regulated by differential DNA methylation inherited from gametes. Imprinting is pervasive in murine extra-embryonic lineages, and uniquely, the imprinting of several genes has been found to be conferred non-canonically through maternally inherited repressive histone modification H3K27me3. However, the underlying regulatory mechanisms of non-canonical imprinting in post-implantation development remain unexplored. Results We identify imprinted regions in post-implantation epiblast and extra-embryonic ectoderm (ExE) by assaying allelic histone modifications (H3K4me3, H3K36me3, H3K27me3), gene expression, and DNA methylation in reciprocal C57BL/6 and CAST hybrid embryos. We distinguish loci with DNA methylation-dependent (canonical) and independent (non-canonical) imprinting by assaying hybrid embryos with ablated maternally inherited DNA methylation. We find that non-canonical imprints are localized to endogenous retrovirus-K (ERVK) long terminal repeats (LTRs), which act as imprinted promoters specifically in extra-embryonic lineages. Transcribed ERVK LTRs are CpG-rich and located in close proximity to gene promoters, and imprinting status is determined by their epigenetic patterning in the oocyte. Finally, we show that oocyte-derived H3K27me3 associated with non-canonical imprints is not maintained beyond pre-implantation development at these elements and is replaced by secondary imprinted DNA methylation on the maternal allele in post-implantation ExE, while being completely silenced by bi-allelic DNA methylation in the epiblast. Conclusions This study reveals distinct epigenetic mechanisms regulating non-canonical imprinted gene expression between embryonic and extra-embryonic development and identifies an integral role for ERVK LTR repetitive elements.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:44:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f13e69e51574ec4ae0c64c683c949cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1474-760X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:44:49Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Genome Biology
spelling doaj.art-1f13e69e51574ec4ae0c64c683c949cc2022-12-22T01:04:34ZengBMCGenome Biology1474-760X2019-10-0120111710.1186/s13059-019-1833-xEndogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissuesCourtney W. Hanna0Raquel Pérez-Palacios1Lenka Gahurova2Michael Schubert3Felix Krueger4Laura Biggins5Simon Andrews6Maria Colomé-Tatché7Deborah Bourc’his8Wendy Dean9Gavin Kelsey10Epigenetics Programme, Babraham InstituteInstitut Curie, PSL University, Inserm, CNRSUniversity of South BohemiaEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenBioinformatics, Babraham InstituteBioinformatics, Babraham InstituteBioinformatics, Babraham InstituteEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenInstitut Curie, PSL University, Inserm, CNRSEpigenetics Programme, Babraham InstituteEpigenetics Programme, Babraham InstituteAbstract Background Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that allows a subset of genes to be expressed mono-allelically based on the parent of origin and is typically regulated by differential DNA methylation inherited from gametes. Imprinting is pervasive in murine extra-embryonic lineages, and uniquely, the imprinting of several genes has been found to be conferred non-canonically through maternally inherited repressive histone modification H3K27me3. However, the underlying regulatory mechanisms of non-canonical imprinting in post-implantation development remain unexplored. Results We identify imprinted regions in post-implantation epiblast and extra-embryonic ectoderm (ExE) by assaying allelic histone modifications (H3K4me3, H3K36me3, H3K27me3), gene expression, and DNA methylation in reciprocal C57BL/6 and CAST hybrid embryos. We distinguish loci with DNA methylation-dependent (canonical) and independent (non-canonical) imprinting by assaying hybrid embryos with ablated maternally inherited DNA methylation. We find that non-canonical imprints are localized to endogenous retrovirus-K (ERVK) long terminal repeats (LTRs), which act as imprinted promoters specifically in extra-embryonic lineages. Transcribed ERVK LTRs are CpG-rich and located in close proximity to gene promoters, and imprinting status is determined by their epigenetic patterning in the oocyte. Finally, we show that oocyte-derived H3K27me3 associated with non-canonical imprints is not maintained beyond pre-implantation development at these elements and is replaced by secondary imprinted DNA methylation on the maternal allele in post-implantation ExE, while being completely silenced by bi-allelic DNA methylation in the epiblast. Conclusions This study reveals distinct epigenetic mechanisms regulating non-canonical imprinted gene expression between embryonic and extra-embryonic development and identifies an integral role for ERVK LTR repetitive elements.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-019-1833-xGenomic imprintingHistone modificationsExtra-embryonicDevelopmentEmbryoH3K27me3
spellingShingle Courtney W. Hanna
Raquel Pérez-Palacios
Lenka Gahurova
Michael Schubert
Felix Krueger
Laura Biggins
Simon Andrews
Maria Colomé-Tatché
Deborah Bourc’his
Wendy Dean
Gavin Kelsey
Endogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissues
Genome Biology
Genomic imprinting
Histone modifications
Extra-embryonic
Development
Embryo
H3K27me3
title Endogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissues
title_full Endogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissues
title_fullStr Endogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissues
title_full_unstemmed Endogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissues
title_short Endogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissues
title_sort endogenous retroviral insertions drive non canonical imprinting in extra embryonic tissues
topic Genomic imprinting
Histone modifications
Extra-embryonic
Development
Embryo
H3K27me3
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-019-1833-x
work_keys_str_mv AT courtneywhanna endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT raquelperezpalacios endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT lenkagahurova endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT michaelschubert endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT felixkrueger endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT laurabiggins endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT simonandrews endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT mariacolometatche endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT deborahbourchis endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT wendydean endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues
AT gavinkelsey endogenousretroviralinsertionsdrivenoncanonicalimprintinginextraembryonictissues